AP/ March 20, 2012, 4:01 AM

Wave of bombs leaves carnage across Iraq

People and security forces inspect the scene of a car bomb attack in Kirkuk, 180 miles north of Baghdad, Iraq, March 20, 2012.

People and security forces inspect the scene of a car bomb attack in Kirkuk, 180 miles north of Baghdad, Iraq, March 20, 2012. / AP Photo/Emad Matti

BAGHDAD - A torrent of bombings and shootings ripped across eight Iraqi cities on Tuesday, targeting police and Shiite pilgrims and killing 46 people. The deadly wave undermined the government's hopes for stability ahead of next week's meeting of the Arab world's top leaders.

The Iraqi wing of al Qaeda said it was behind at least one of the attacks near Baghdad's heavily guarded Green Zone. A statement on a militant website said the group targeted the office that will oversee security for the upcoming Arab League summit -- the first time the meeting is set to be held in Baghdad for more than a generation.

"Death is approaching you, when you least expect it," said the Islamic state of Iraq, a local front group for al Qaeda.

Authorities have feared al Qaeda or its Sunni sympathizers would try to thwart this year's Arab League summit. Plans for Baghdad to host the meeting last year were postponed, in part because of concerns about Iraq's security.

American gym teacher dies in Iraq school shooting
Scores killed as attacks target Iraq police
For some vets, the Iraq war will never end

In all, eight cities were hit Tuesday in what appeared to be coordinated attacks against police and government officials. More than 200 people were wounded in a gloomy reminder of the violence that has sown chaos across Iraq since the U.S. invasion exactly nine years ago.

One of the deadliest strikes came in the Shiite holy city of Karbala, where officials said two car bombs exploded in a crowded shopping and restaurant area. Thirteen people were killed and another 50 were wounded in that assault, said local provincial council member Hussein Shadhan al-Aboudi.

Five Iranian pilgrims were among the dead. Located 50 miles south of Baghdad, Karbala is a destination for thousands of Shiite pilgrims from around the world who visit the golden shrines of two revered imams each day.

"The intention of these attacks is to destabilize the security situation in Karbala and other Iraqi cities and to shake the people's confidence on the government," al-Aboudi said. "It seems that the terrorists want to abort the upcoming Arab Summit in Baghdad. The message is directed to the Arab leaders that Iraq is not safe enough to be visited."

The wave of violence began after dawn Tuesday.

Militants blew up the house of a police official in the western city of Fallujah, planted bombs near the fortified Green Zone and shot up a security checkpoint in Baghdad, set off an explosion at a police station in the northern city of Kirkuk and attacked restaurants and shopping areas in two southern towns.

Police and health officials in each city who confirmed the casualties spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media.

Saman Majid, a cameraman for the Kirkuk police department said he had just arrived at work when the bomb outside the station exploded. He said he was wounded by small shrapnel that hit his head and ran to the Kirkuk General Hospital for treatment instead of waiting for an ambulance.

"I quickly got out of my car to see burned bodies trapped inside the cars," he said. "Dozens of cars were on fire. It was a scene from hell, where there is only a huge fire and dead people and nothing else."

Thirteen people, most of them policemen, were killed in Kirkuk, said Brig. Gen. Sarhad Qadir. An additional 59 were wounded. Kirkuk is 180 miles north of Baghdad.

Officials have been bracing for attacks in the run-up to the Arab League summit during which the Shiite-led government hopes to showcase Iraq's improved security and stability since the sectarian fighting a few years ago that almost pulled the country into civil war.

Insurgents are seeking to belie Baghdad's better image, and officials expect more attacks as hundreds of dignitaries and journalists converge on the capital next week.

Two of the attacks Tuesday hit right outside the Green Zone where the summit will be held.

Last week, the government said Iraq would deploy an unprecedented number of security forces to protect the capital for the summit. An estimated 26,000 police and soldiers -- including more than 4,000 from Iraq's north and south -- are expected to be deployed in Baghdad.

But citizens and lawmakers have questioned whether Baghdad would be safe during the Arab meeting.

Extremists have launched large-scale attacks in Iraq every few weeks for nearly a year. The violence now is nowhere as frequent as it was during the tit-for-tat sectarian fighting a few years ago. But the attacks appear to be more deadly than they were before American military's withdrawal in late December.

The last widespread wave of attacks across Iraq, on Feb. 23, killed 55 people and wounded more than 225.

Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh on Tuesday announced a weeklong federal holiday in Baghdad, from March 25-31, when government offices will be shut down.

Officials also will impose a curfew in parts of Baghdad on March 29, when the Arab heads of state fly in, and try to curb violence by shutting off roads near the Green Zone and encouraging people to stay at home.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
13 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Molly-Pchr says:
Look, you just can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. We need to bring home our troops.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bradkt1 says:
Thousands of American lives wasted...and tens of thousands more Americans maimed and their lives ruined...

...to accomplish this?

I believe that the lesson that we have not learned since VietNam is that unless we allow our troops to fight to win, they should not be committed...and never to achieve an always elusive political goal.

Saddam Hussein killed and murdered his way to power and to stay in power. With Saddam gone, these people kill and murder each other to achieve power and to stay in power. I fail to see any real difference. I see nothing that has resulted from our intervention that resembles a Western style democracy in substance. Would the average Iraqi say that they are better off in their day to day lives? I think not...at least not to any degree that justifies America's sacrifice of either its soldiers or its treasure.

This is not "victory." This is a tragedy...and a total waste.
reply
slatep replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I agree.!!

Go to NewsMaxx and see what it has to ay about the order Obama signed last week giving him the ability to declare martial law in the event we go to war with Iran.

For the uninformed; martial law would give Obama complete control over all us assets.
jgnv replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
So true. You would think we would at some point grasp the reality that our military intervention ultimately never makes a difference. As soon as we leave, it's back to "business as usual". I just hope our leaders recognize this sooner rather than later and get our troops out of Afghanistan as soon as possible.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jsl45 says:
The real IDIOTS in the story of Iraq is george bush and darth cheney who thought they could pick up the statue of liberty and annoit this heathens with democracy....just goes to show you what a bunch of idiots those guys were and still are!!!
reply
ConSense replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I'm thankful they had more foresight and more courage than our current coward-in-chief and those who support him. Defeatists accomplish nothing...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ConSense says:
It's interesting that another CBS story quotes Condi Rice as saying that we must not "lose our nerve in Afghanistan." It's too late, Ms. Rice. We've already surrendered Iraq and will soon the the same in Afghanistan. America's liberals, led by our coward-in-chief, have prevailed.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
endpcnow says:
Ruthless dictatorships seem to be the only way to rule the countries in the Middle East. The parties involved only understand harsh, deadly and barbaric actions like the kind the Saddam Husseins, Gaddafi and Mubaraks put upon their people. It seems that only two kinds of governments can exist there . . . good ole fashioned dictatorships or Islamic dictatorships.
reply
ConSense replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
They respect STRENGTH. The US had an opportunity to show the Iraqis strength without the tyranny of Saddam Hussein. Unfortunately, our weak president chose to walk away, instead. We'll do it soon in Afghanistan too. And we wonder why the people won't get behind us? They know full well that we'll walk away and leave them to the Taliban. That's what they get for putting their trust in US.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
walt9800 says:
Truly, these terrorists - who wantonly and intentionally kill innocent civilians - are the hounds of hell, totally devoid of of even the smallest shred of humanity. May the day come quickly when they are swallowed up by the earth and returned to satan's domain from whence they came.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ConSense says:
Is anyone surprised? Obama insisted on kowtowing to an Iraqi government that is still too weak to create stability. For political reasons, he surrendered Iraq to its fate: it will soon be another Islamic dictatorship like its neighbor, Iran. Iraqis who allied themselves to the U.S. will be slaughtered like sheep, and women will go back to being uneducated house slaves. But, hey - Obama brought the troops home! Except for the thousands who died for a cause our cowardly commander in chief abandoned for a few votes.
reply
signseeker1717 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Are you suggesting we should STILL have troops in Iraq, when we shouldn't have been there in the first place?
ConSense replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I'm suggesting the question of whether we should have been there in the first place is irrelevant. We WERE there. We should have finished the job instead of walking away.
See all 13 Comments