Khamenei welcomes Obama's "window of opportunity"
In this Friday, Feb. 3, 2012 file photo released by an official website of the Iranian supreme leader's office, Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei waves to the worshippers, in front of a portrait of the late revolutionary founder Ayatollah Khomeini, before he delivers his Friday prayers sermon, at the Tehran University campus, Iran. / File,AP Photo/Office of the Supreme Leader
(CBS/AP) TEHRAN, Iran - Iran's top leader Thursday welcomed comments by President Barack Obama advocating diplomacy and not war as a solution to Tehran's nuclear ambitions, a rare positive signal in long-standing hostile transactions between Tehran and Washington.
The report on Iran's state television quoted Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as praising a recent statement by the U.S. president saying he saw a "window of opportunity" to use diplomacy to resolve the nuclear dispute.
Khamenei, who has final say on all state matters in Iran, told a group of clerics: "This expression is a good word. This is a wise remark indicating taking distance from illusion."
It is one of the rare cases in which Iran's top leader praised an American leader.
White House spokesman Jay Carney said in response to Khamenei's comments that President Obama is not focused on what the Iranian regime says.
"The president's policy toward Iran is focused in a very clear-eyed way on Iranian behavior, certainly not on rhetoric of any kind," Carney said. "The pressure on Iran will continue. The ratcheting up of sanctions will continue, because the only change in that effort will come, if it comes, with a change in Iranian behavior with regards to its (nuclear) programs."
Kerry: Romney's behavior on Iran "irresponsible"
Romney: Obama "dawdled" on Iran
Obama to GOP rivals: War in Iran "not a game"
Washington and Tehran have had no diplomatic relations since the 1979 takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran by Iranian students who took American diplomats hostage.
Both the U.S. and Israel fear Iran's nuclear program is aimed at building a nuclear weapon, while Iran says its nuclear activities are geared toward peaceful purposes such as power generation. But the U.S. and Israel have differed over how to deal with the nuclear problem.
Israel has said military action should be considered to stop the Iranians. President Barack Obama told visiting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu earlier this week that diplomacy must be given more time.
On Tuesday, President Obama said diplomacy can still resolve the nuclear crisis and accused his Republican critics of "beating the drums of war."
Mr. Obama added that the Iranians need to show how serious they are about resolving the crisis. He said there are steps the Iranians can take "that are verifiable" and will allow the country to be "in compliance with international norms and mandates."
AP: Iran may have cleaned up nuke work
IAEA members struggle to find unity on Iran nukes
But Khamenei had criticism for Mr. Obama as well. The Iranian leader said the economic sanctions pushed by the U.S. and other nations as a way to get Iran to alter its nuclear program would fail.
He said the U.S. president has continued a policy of wanting the Iranian nation to "...bow through imposing sanctions."
Khamenei said resorting to the sanctions was a sign of misunderstanding and an unrealistic approach by the U.S. toward the Iranian nation.
The Iranian leader warned that the misunderstanding will damage American leaders: "It will lead their calculations to failure."
Khamenei's response focused on the U.S., but concerns over Iran's nuclear program extend beyond Washington and Tel Aviv.
Six world powers on Thursday urged Iran to answer questions about suspicions it is working on nuclear weapons, but stressed that diplomacy was the way forward, in a carefully worded statement that reflected Western sensitivity to Russian and Chinese concerns about being too harsh on Tehran.
The six urged Iran to open its Parchin military site to International Atomic Energy Agency perusal, amid reports that Tehran might be cleaning it of evidence of nuclear arms related experiments — a request echoed by other speakers at the 35-nation IAEA board meeting.
While also stressing the diplomacy was the key to resolving tensions over Iran's nuclear program, a European Union statement was stronger than that from the six powers, noting "regret" of Iran's lack of response to international concern.
Concerns about Parchin are high. Diplomats who spoke to The Associated Press on Wednesday based their assessment on satellite images of the Iranian military facility they said appeared to show trucks and earth-moving vehicles, indicating an attempted cleanup of radioactive traces.
Two of six diplomats said their information reveals that Iran had experimented with a test version of a neutron trigger at the site used to set of a nuclear blast — information not previously made public.
The IAEA has already identified Parchin as the location of suspected nuclear weapons-related testing. In a November report, it said it appeared to be the site of experiments with conventional high explosives meant to initiate a nuclear chain reaction.
IAEA expert teams trying to probe the suspicions of secret weapons work by Iran tried — and failed — twice in recent weeks to get Iranian permission to visit Parchin.
Tehran said on Monday that such a visit would be granted. But it said that a comprehensive agreement outlining conditions of such an inspection must first be agreed on — a move dismissed by a senior international official familiar with the issue as a delaying tactic.
He requested anonymity because his organization does not authorize him to speak publicly on confidential IAEA matters.
The EU statement was sprinkled with diplomatic code words meant to convey strong criticism of Iran's defiance of international demands that it lower tensions levels by compromising on its nuclear activities.
"We deeply regret" Iran's lack of efforts to dispel international suspicions, said the statement, urging it "to enter without delay" into a dialogue with the agency that leads quickly to diminishing fears of a secret nuclear-weapons agenda on the part of Tehran.
German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle was even more direct. He said Germany and the five other world powers trying to engage Tehran on its nuclear program were sending "a clear message to Iran to finally end its non-cooperation and to clear up all the justified concerns about the purpose of its atom program transparently and logically."
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Mexico's drug war 20 Photos
- U.K. official: London attack suspects probed before
- Tokyo's rockabilly scene 16 Photos
- Graphic video: Man dead in "truly shocking" London attack Play Video
- Muslim hard-liners ID suspect in London attack
- Man dead in "truly shocking" London attack 253 Comments
- London soldier slaying homegrown Islamic extremism?
- Tokyo's rockabilly subculture 16 Photos
What? Afghanistan was very much deserved revenge for 911. Bush had the country behind him on that. As far as Saddam, negotiations completely fell apart and Saddam refused to abide by any sanctions placed against him.
----
Sam,
Either you ignore or are ignorant of two facts that make you comments untrue:
1. The Tleban offer up bin Laden two weeks before the invasion of Afghanistan, but dubya was hell-bent on war, and;
2. Violations of UN Resolutions are not enforceable by individual member nations, but rather, by the UN itself - but dubya was hell-bent on war.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/panetta-obamas-cuts-create-risks-military-s-capability-respond
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=49819
And, how about all of these peace initiatives breaking out so conveniently timed?
http://boston.cbslocal.com/2012/03/02/bradleyjay-obamas-leap-day-deal-with-north-korea-is-foolish-election-ploy/
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203370604577261340140502510.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Well, it sure did not take Iran long did it? Talk about treasonous!! Wonder what Axelrod is saying about the coincidences??
There are some who say sanctions only hurt the "people" and even sanctions should be approached with caution or not at all. That's only partially true. In this connected age the rules have altered a bit and no one can shut down the Web entirely; a lesson Egypt learned the hard way. Those who are most affected may not be the various elites but no matter how repressive a regieme, the top dawgs WILL have to answer eventually (Take note, Bashir!); ordinary people have far more access to the outside world than ever before. And if the storm breaks and the Iranian citizenry break out the torches, tar barrels 'n' feathers and the pitchforks, it won't be Washington they'll march on, it will be Tehran. Khamenei knows this, if for no other reason then the fact that his palace is a lot easier to reach than the White House. He'll want to negotiate.
But he will also want to at minimum, appear to win. I would recommend against further squeezing and move on with a carrot/stick approach. Something like this for example:
"You're willing to talk, great. Here's a little something to thank you for your trouble (medicinal supplies, water projects, farm aid - whatever); the carrot. But if you wimp out on us again, we'll take all that away and pinch you further"; the stick.
Look how that's worked so well in the House and Senate.