AP/ February 27, 2012, 10:07 PM

Israel could strike Iran without warning U.S.

An Israeli navy vessel enters the southern port of Ashdod, July 19, 2011.

An Israeli navy vessel enters the southern port of Ashdod, July 19, 2011. / Getty

WASHINGTON - Israeli officials say they won't warn the U.S. if they decide to launch a pre-emptive strike against Iranian nuclear facilities, according to one U.S. intelligence official familiar with the discussions. The pronouncement, delivered in a series of private, top-level conversations, sets a tense tone ahead of meetings in the coming days at the White House and Capitol Hill.

Israeli officials said that if they eventually decide a strike is necessary, they would keep the Americans in the dark to decrease the likelihood that the U.S. would be held responsible for failing to stop Israel's potential attack. The U.S. has been working with the Israelis for months to persuade them that an attack would be only a temporary setback to Iran's nuclear program.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak delivered the message to a series of top-level U.S. visitors to the country, including the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the White House national security adviser and the director of national intelligence, and top U.S. lawmakers, all trying to close the trust gap between Israel and the U.S. over how to deal with Iran's nuclear ambitions.

Netanyahu delivered the same message to all the Americans who have traveled to Israel for talks, the U.S. official said.

The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive strategic negotiations.

U.S. on guard against possible Iran plots
Israel on heightened alert after attacks abroad
Global banking hub preps eviction of Iran banks

The White House did not respond to requests for comment, and the Pentagon and Office of Director of National Intelligence declined to comment, as did the Israeli Embassy.

Iran claims its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the International Atomic Energy Agency has raised alarms that its uranium enrichment program might be a precursor to building nuclear weapons. The U.S. has said it does not know whether the government has decided to weaponize its nuclear material and put it on a missile or other delivery device.

The secret warning is likely to worry U.S. officials and begin the high level meetings with Israel and the U.S. far apart on how to handle Iran.

(At left, click to watch "Eye on Iran: U.S. prepares for possible attack")

But the apparent decision to keep the U.S. in the dark also stems from Israel's frustration with the White House. After a visit by National Security Adviser Tom Donilon in particular, they became convinced the Americans would neither take military action, nor go along with unilateral action by Israel against Iran. The Israelis concluded they would have to conduct a strike unilaterally — a point they are likely to hammer home in a series of meetings over the next two weeks in Washington, the official said.

Barak will meet with top administration and congressional officials during his visit. Netanyahu arrives in Washington for meetings with President Barack Obama next week.

The behind-the-scenes warning belies the publicly united front the two sides have attempted to craft with the shuttle diplomacy to each other's capitals.

"It's unprecedented outreach to Israel to make sure we are working together to develop the plan to deter Iran from developing a nuclear weapon," and to keep them from exporting terrorism, said Maryland Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee.

Ruppersberger traveled there with the intelligence committee chairman, Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., to meet Israel's prime minister and defense minister, along with other officials.

"We talked about the fact that sanctions are working and they are going to get a lot more aggressive," Ruppersberger added.

They also discussed talked about presenting a unified front to Iran, to counter the media reports that the two countries are at odds over how and when to attack Iran.

"We have to learn from North Korea. All those (peace) talks and stalling and they developed a nuclear weapon," he said. "We are going to send a message, enough is enough, the stalling is over. ... All options are on the table."

"I got the sense that Israel is incredibly serious about a strike on their nuclear weapons program," Rogers told CNN on Monday. "It's their calculus that the administration ... is not serious about a real military consequence to Iran moving forward.

"They believe they're going to have to make a decision on their own, given the current posture of the United States," he added.

U.S. intelligence and special operations officials have tried to keep a dialogue going with Israel, despite the high-level impasse, sharing with them options such as allowing Israel to use U.S. bases in the region from which to launch such a strike, as a way to make sure the Israelis give the Americans a heads-up, according to the U.S. official, and a former U.S. official with knowledge of the communications

Cooperation has improved on sharing of intelligence in the region, according to one current and one former U.S. official. Israel is providing key information on Syria for instance, now that the U.S. has closed its embassy and pulled out both its diplomats and intelligence officials stationed there, the U.S. official said.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
63 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Masha_B says:
I am not surprised that US is "allowing" Israel to solve the problem of nuclear Iran alone. Why bother? How about thanking Israelis for being on the forefront of when things really go wrong*?

*Reminder: when there was a real threat of Iraq developing nuclear weapons in 1982, it was Israel that took the heat and prevented that from happening. Nicely and neatly. No lengthy invasion was needed.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Threewarriors says:
As soon as Syria has new leadership, then Iran is next.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Threewarriors says:
I say lift all the sanctions against Iran. When peaceful nuclear research turns to atomic bombs, then Iran will hear from us directly.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
I am Jewish and I am appalled about the depth of the control of our government by Israel and it's supporters. I am ashamed of these violent and blinded Zionist extremists.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
P0STING_AWAY says:
We need to immediately cut these Welfare Queens off and
demand repayment of all past welfare checks.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Bojax39 says:
"Israeli officials say they won't warn the U.S. if they decide to launch a pre-emptive strike against Iranian nuclear facilities"

And as a sovereign nation, there's no reason why they're required to
do so.
reply
Masha_B replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
To MarineVet46:

You seem to be quite opinionated.
Regarding Christian Tourists, here is CBS article that mentions that one of the tourist was stabbed where she had her star of david hanging: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20026185-504083.html
At any rate, stabbing is very typical way Palestinian militants terrorize Israelis. Especially in Jerusalem in in the Israeli settlements in the West Bank. When Israelis get stabbed you do not hear about it much. At any rate 3 people (Arabs) confessed to their involvement. Nothing unusual here.
Your remark about "Liberty" is also very much off. Do not remember details, but despite your allegations it is more likely to have been a mistake.(BTW, where are you quoting from? Electronic Intifada?)
linkicon reporticon emailicon
erpicferl says:
let israel strike and let israel deal with the consequences without our support.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
infantryman1968 says:
Israel could strike Iran without warning U.S.


LOL!

Good! Obama's followers would definately tip off Iran!

The irony is Obama authorized deployment of anti-ballistic missiles to beef up the Iran-Iraq border and the tranfer of 100 U.S. made advanced bunker busters to the Israelis last year.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
samXXkiley says:
coucou,
it is unlikely that such thing will happen, however, If this happens Israel will be the first to suffer, but "also" to take responsibility of such act.
"au revoir"
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jesus_to_ground_control says:
Petition

I, Jesus_toground_control hereby declare that the world must come together (U.N. preferably) and:

-Feed all the children in the world;

-Stop the proliferation of nuclear arms;

-Accelerate the acceptance of Palestine and Israel as permanent members at the United Nations;

-Replace fossil fuels by cleaner fuels sooner than later;

-Use patience with cultures that are slower to adapt to change;

-Stop the use of religion in politics (the ethics are not the same, creates idolatry);

-Discover why dolphins are dying by the hundred on the seashores of Cape Cod Bay;

-Get President Obama to sing "Let's stay together" in its entirety at the United Nations annual conference.
reply
Bojax39 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
by Jesus_to_ground_control: "I, Jesus_toground_control hereby declare that the world must come together"

You, Jesus_to_ground_control, need to select another screen name before folks start seeing you as a nut-job. Unless your given name is actually Jesus, of course....
See all 63 Comments