U.S. softens stance on arms for Syria rebels

A Free Syrian Army fighter stands guard in Idlib, Syria, near the Turkish border, Feb. 19, 2012. / AFP/Getty Images

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration opened the door slightly Tuesday to international military assistance for Syria's rebels, with officials saying new tactics may have to be explored if President Bashar Assad continues to defy pressure to halt a brutal crackdown on dissenters.

In coordinated messages, the White House and State Department said they still hope for a political solution. But faced with the daily onslaught by the Assad regime against Syrian civilians, officials dropped the administration's previous strident opposition to arming anti-regime forces. It remained unclear, though, what, if any, role the U.S. might play in providing such aid.

"We don't want to take actions that would contribute to the further militarization of Syria because that could take the country down a dangerous path," White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters. "But we don't rule out additional measures if the international community should wait too long and not take the kind of action that needs to be taken."

Syria: Dozens killed, Red Cross urges cease-fire
Syrian forces shell Homs as troops mass

The administration has previously said flatly that more weapons are not the answer to the Syrian situation. There had been no mention of "additional measures."

At the State Department, spokeswoman Victoria Nuland used nearly identical language to describe the administration's evolving position.

"From our perspective, we don't believe that it makes sense to contribute now to the further militarization of Syria," she told reporters. "What we don't want to see is the spiral of violence increase. That said, if we can't get Assad to yield to the pressure that we are all bringing to bear, we may have to consider additional measures."

Neither Carney nor Nuland would elaborate on what "additional measures" might be taken but there have been growing calls, including from some in Congress, for the international community to arm the rebels. Most suggestions to that effect have foreseen Arab nations such as Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia — and not the West — possibly providing military assistance.

Other officials said discussions are now under way about adding a military component to a package of humanitarian and political aid to the opposition that's to be discussed at a major international conference on Syria this week in Tunisia.

More than 70 countries have been invited to meet Friday in Tunisia for a "Friends of Syria" meeting. The meeting follows the failure of the UN Security Council to endorse an Arab plan that would have seen Assad removed from power.

The meeting of the "Friends of Syria" in Tunis is not likely to produce decisions on military aid or even recognition of Syria's disparate opposition groups, according to U.S. officials. But countries are considering creating large stockpiles of humanitarian aid along Syria's borders, the officials said.

U.S. officials stressed that discussion of military assistance is still preliminary. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the diplomacy. To maintain the pressure against Assad, Washington is trying to keep as many countries as possible involved in the international coordination against Syria's government — even if there is no consensus strategy on arming the rebels.

This week's talks will seek to clarify some of the confusion. The U.S. is trying to get a clearer picture of what promises countries such as Syria's Arab neighbors are making to elements of the opposition; which rebels each government might support; and some agreement on what types of assistance would be helpful or damaging.

The backdrop to the discussions is the increasing fear that Syria could descend into an all-out civil war.

Meanwhile, the Pentagon on Tuesday disputed reports that Iranian ships docked at a Syrian port over the weekend.

Iranian state-run Press TV said Saturday that an Iranian navy destroyer and a supply ship had docked in the port of Tartus to provide training to ally Syria's naval forces, as Syria tries to crush the opposition movement.

But Defense Department press secretary George Little said Tuesday the U.S. military saw no indication that the ships docked or delivered any cargo. Little said Tehran's ships went through the Suez Canal and now appear to be going back through the canal again.

Sen. John McCain told "CBS Evening News" anchor Scott Pelley on Monday that Iranian involvement shouldn't be a reason preventing the United States from providing support to the rebels. (Click video player above to see interview)

[credibility2]

It isn't our responsibility to arm the opposition. It's bad enough that our president and his party encourage the occupy limp movement...that too isn't something they should stick their noses into. Syria can resolve it's own problems...even if Assad is ousted, more than likely what replaces him will be even worse.

[commenter777]

If we wait much longer there won't be any rebels left. For the love of god let's at least arm them so they don't get picked off like ducks in a row. This is a massacre of women and children. It's about as bad as human bs can get and we're doing nothing?

[starving1968-3]

John McCain is far and away, the MOST DANGEROUS politician in America, for America.

NO ONE cares less about America's safety and security, and NO ONE would throw our safety and security away for another nation, quicker than this f***ing traitor would.

[pededoff]

pYes lets arm the rebels like we did in Afghanistan .How's that working out??? Libya is going down along with Egypt and the rest of the region .
McCain is a idiot just like the whole Obama administration
better the devil you know than the one you don't,

ee

[ozilot]

Giving arms to the Syrian opposition may sound like a nice idea...but it really is a gateway action that will eventually lead to direct U.S. military involvement which is a BAD IDEA.

It deplorable what Assad and his Alawite compatriots are doing to the Syrian people -- but getting involved directly or indirectly would be contrary to U.S. interest.

After all if the Arab League can't convice Russia and China to at least support UNSC resolutions there is probably not much anyone can do anyway.

If the Syrians truly want to be free of Assad, they should simply remove him themselves -- that way they will be truly free with no obligations or expectations from the West.

[rwsmith29456]

I have an idea. Declare a 'no fly' zone over Syria then use that as an excuse to bomb the crap out of whoever we don't like.... wait a minute. Has that been done before???

[Samlv]

So, we know they're backed by AQ...... what's the issue here?

Are we off being stupid again? Yep.

Turkey has an army. Let the Arab League ask them to go on in and get shot.

[ijbtheterrible]

Killing is only good for politicians and military suppliers. The enemy are men as we are. Talk is better but killing is the final answer. Let the people who advocate fighting and the people making the weapons supply at their own risk. Let them suffer the horror of killing and learn that words of right and wrong mean little to the dead and suffering.

[Americank17]

President OBAMA Please allow the INTERNATIONAL Community to STAND on the SIDE OF THE SYRIAN PEOPLE by Supplying the FREEDOM FIGHTERS with the NECESSARY INTEL and ARMORY to DEFEAT The DICTATOR and OPPRESSIVE REGIME OF THAT INHUMANE ASSADD! TO BAD and SAD that because of WORLD POLITICS 8,000 INNOCENT PEOPLE HAD TO SUFFER AND DIE in the HANDS of the MURDEROUS SYRIAN ARMY and it's PAID MONSTERS (Not Even Decent Mercs would Fight for that A-WHOLE A.S.S.-Sadd! "Sir, YOU NEED TO TAKE HIM DOWN" NOW ASAP! PLEASE! For Theirs and Ours SAKES!!! Sincerelyyours, AMERICAN K-17 Secret Service of The World, CHIEF!

[baileyccc]

Where is the muslim brotherhood? Let them arm them and fight for them, we ain't the policeman for the world.