NATO mulls paying bulk of Afghan security costs

BRUSSELS — NATO's top official said Friday that the alliance expects regional powers to contribute to a multibillion dollar fund to finance the Afghan army and police after they assume full responsibility for the war in 2014.

Since Afghanistan — one of the world's poorest nations — cannot foot the estimated $6 billion (4.6 billion euros) annual bill, NATO nations will have to pay the bulk of it. But austerity measures and budgetary cuts caused by the financial crisis in the United States and Europe are making it difficult to raise the money within the alliance.

Anders Fogh Rasmussen said he was appealing to the entire international community to help finance the force.

Asked whether he was specifically referring to China, India and Russia, he replied: "It's a call on the whole of the international community to contribute to financing the Afghan security forces because I think it is also in the interest of countries in the region to see a stable and secure Afghanistan."

"So my call on the international community also includes countries in the region," he said.

Fogh Rasmussen said defense ministers had also discussed the "sustainable size" of the future Afghan army and police, but that a final decision will be left to the NATO summit in Chicago next May.

NATO chief backs quicker Afghan security shift
Logan: Early Afghan drawdown what Taliban wants
U.S. combat role in Afghanistan to end in '13

The two-day meeting in Brussels of ministers from NATO's 28 nations and 22 other countries taking part in the war in Afghanistan is meant to pave the way for the Chicago summit.

The Afghan army and police are scheduled to grow to more than 350,000 members by 2014. But some have projected that the force can be safely reduced in order to reduce its costs.

"A reasonable number would be 230,000," French Defense Minister Gerard Longuet said after the meeting.

The Taliban insurgents are estimated to have about 20,000 armed men.

A related unresolved question that also will be taken up in Chicago is the number of U.S. and other foreign troops that might remain behind and what missions they would be assigned.

The debate on the costs of the Afghan security forces came after NATO allies agreed broadly on Thursday to step back from the lead combat role in Afghanistan and let local forces take their place as early as next year, a shortened timetable that startled officials and members of the U.S. Congress.

• 1
• 2
• Next Page »

[lucifersshadow]

Only on Al Jazeera . . . http://www.aljazeera.com/video/americas/2012/02/201229151012246921.html

[nonpolitico]

From what I have seen, when US forces leave, the Afghan "Government" is toast.
Just about the same time US forces depart, China will be making a start on the railway they are building to take advantage of the vast mineral wealth hidden in the Afghan mountains.
Well done White House!
Instead of threatening Iran, how about another railway line from the coast of Iran to the Pakistani border?
After all, the Brits left railways all over India, which are still looked after by the Indians, who are very proud of them.
Build a rail link! Better than bombing, and who knows, could bring East and West together better than all the Patrols and "hearts and minds" efforts!!

[joesapper]

is it just me or does this sound like a very bad idea? china and russia will become the new fools in the region so why do we need to make their path in easy by paying the way. the marriage never got past the first date, and now we are going to pay support payments for the divorce. wow LORD where has wisdom gone.