AP/ November 27, 2011, 8:06 AM

Pakistan retaliation puts NATO in lurch

Afghanistan-bound trucks carrying supplies for NATO forces are parked as authorities closed the border at Torkham, in Pakistan, Sunday, Nov 27, 2011.

Afghanistan-bound trucks carrying supplies for NATO forces are parked as authorities closed the border at Torkham, in Pakistan, Sunday, Nov 27, 2011. / AP Photo/Qazi Rauf

PESHAWAR, Pakistan - Hundreds of trucks carrying supplies to U.S.-led troops in Afghanistan backed up at Pakistani border crossings Sunday, leaving them vulnerable to militant attack a day after Islamabad closed the frontier in retaliation for coalition airstrikes that allegedly killed 24 Pakistani troops.

As Pakistan army chief Gen. Ashfaq Pervez Kayani attended the funerals of the victims, including a major, the U.S. sought to minimize the fallout from the crisis, which plunged Washington's already-troubled relationship with Islamabad to an all-time low.

Pakistan also ordered the U.S. to vacate an air base that is used by American drones to target al Qaeda and Taliban militants in the country's tribal region along the Afghan border. The U.S. has relied heavily on drone strikes in the past few years, partly out of frustration with Pakistan's refusal to target militants using its territory to stage attacks against American and NATO troops in Afghanistan.

Pakistan orders U.S. to shut major down air base
Anti-NATO tension builds in Pakistan
NATO: "Highly likely" it killed Pakistanis

There are forces working against a total rupture in the relationship. Pakistan still relies on billions of dollars in American military and civilian aid, and the U.S. needs Islamabad's help to push Afghan insurgents to engage in peace talks.

But tensions could rise further if militants unleash attacks against the stranded trucks ferrying NATO supplies to Afghanistan.

Suspected militants destroyed around 150 trucks and injured drivers and police a year ago after Pakistan closed one of its Afghan border crossings to NATO supplies for about 10 days in retaliation for a U.S. helicopter attack that accidentally killed two Pakistani soldiers.

People offer funeral prayers for victims of Saturday's NATO attack, in Peshawar, Pakistan, Sunday, Nov 27, 2011.

/ AP Photo/Mohammad Sajjad

The situation could be more dire this time because Pakistan, outraged at the alleged NATO attack before dawn Saturday, has closed both its crossings. Nearly 300 trucks carrying coalition supplies are now backed up at Torkham in the northwest Khyber tribal area and Chaman in southwestern Baluchistan province. Last year, Pakistan only closed Torkham.

"We are worried," said driver Saeed Khan, speaking by telephone from the border terminal in Torkham. "This area is always vulnerable to attacks. Sometimes rockets are lobbed at us. Sometimes we are targeted by bombs."

Khan and hundreds of other drivers and their assistants barely slept Saturday night because they were worried about potential attacks, he said.

Some drivers said Pakistan had sent paramilitary troops to protect their convoys since the closures, but others were left without any additional protection. Even those who did receive troops did not feel safe.

"If there is an attack, what can five or six troops do? Nothing," said Niamatullah Khan, a fuel truck driver who was parked with 35 other vehicles at a restaurant about 125 miles (200 kilometers) from Chaman.

NATO ships nearly 50 percent of its non-lethal supplies to its troops in Afghanistan through Pakistan. The trucks are periodically targeted by suspected militants as they travel through the country, and their drivers are sometimes killed. NATO has said these attacks do not significantly impact its ability to keep its troops supplied.

An official closely involved with the Afghan war said there will likely be no immediate negative effect from Pakistan's decision to close its border crossings. NATO has built up a large stockpile of military and other supplies that could enable operations to continue at their current level for several months, said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

NATO has reduced the amount of non-lethal supplies it ships through Pakistan from a high of around 80 percent by using routes through Central Asia. The northern logistics link could be expanded to make up for the Pakistani closure, but it would leave NATO heavily dependent on Russia at a time when ties with Moscow are increasingly strained.

Some critical supplies, including ammunition, are airlifted directly to Afghan air bases.

Pakistan eventually relented and reopened Torkham last year after the U.S. apologized. But the number of alleged casualties is much higher this time. The relationship between the two countries has also severely deteriorated over the past year, especially following the covert U.S. raid that killed Osama bin Laden in a Pakistani garrison town in May. Islamabad was outraged because it wasn't told about the operation beforehand.

Pakistani Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar told U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Sunday that the alleged NATO attack negated all progress in improving the tattered alliance between the two countries.

She told Clinton in a phone call that the alleged NATO attack was unacceptable, showed complete disregard for human life and sparked rage within Pakistan, according to a press release issued by the Pakistani prime minister's office.

In addition to closing its border crossings, Pakistan gave the U.S. 15 days to vacate Shamsi Air Base in Baluchistan. The U.S. uses the base to service drones when they cannot return to their bases inside Afghanistan because of weather conditions or mechanical difficulty, U.S. and Pakistani officials said. They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters.

The Pakistani army said Saturday that NATO helicopters and fighter jets carried out an "unprovoked" attack on two of its border posts in the Mohmand tribal area before dawn, killing 24 soldiers and wounding 13 others.

Pakistan held funerals for the soldiers Sunday at the army's headquarters in Peshawar, the most important city in the country's northwest. Mourners said prayers in front of caskets wrapped in green and white Pakistani flags.

A spokesman for NATO forces, Brig. Gen. Carsten Jacobson, said Saturday that Afghan and coalition troops were operating in the border area of eastern Afghanistan when "a tactical situation" prompted them to call in close air support.

Afghan officials said Sunday that the call was made after Afghan soldiers came under fire. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the incident.

Jacobson told BBC television that it was "highly likely" that the airstrikes caused Pakistani casualties, but an investigation is being conducted to determine the details.

U.S. officials have expressed their sympathies over the incident and have promised to work closely with Pakistan as NATO carries out its investigation.

NATO's top official, Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, offered his "deepest condolences" and said the coalition was committed to working with Pakistan to "avoid such tragedies in the future."

"We have a joint interest in the fight against cross-border terrorism and in ensuring that Afghanistan does not once again become a safe haven for terrorists," Rasmussen said in Brussels.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
22 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
slatep says:
More blackmail on the part of the Pakistanis.!

The United States should start demanding financial payment from Pakistan for every US and NATO troop that is killed as a result of Pakistans withholding vital supplies to US and NATO troops.

Deduct from the millions of dolars we continue to pay Pakistan for its supposed support on the war against terrorism for every day they hold these vital supply convoys hostage.

Instead of dancing around with these foreign countries with so called "diplomacy" start getting real and call a spade a spade.

"Diplomacy" is just another form of subtrefuge creating an atmosphere where all countries can lie their socks off and get away with it.

Lies (Obama), political correctness, back door deals and corruption have landed the US where it is today.

The American people are finally awakening to the fact that we are being shafted every minute of every day by our own government.

The President, Congress, the Senate and especially the House of Representatives should be forced to justify absolutely every move they make.

We can no longer afford to wait four years to try and correct all this corruption and discord among politicians.

If we wait until November 2012 to put a stop to all this crap coming out of Washington. it just might be too late.

Petition the government to hold a special election in March of 2012 and get rid of all these corrupt, self-serving bloodsuckers out of there.!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
smittyc says:
Here at home we are looking at a double dip. Our stock markets have not dropped in one month this much since 1932 when unemployment was estimated to hit 25%. We are pouring money into the defense sector which has destroyed jobs for Americans here at home. REmember when we had no war? We had levels of unemployment at below 4%, gas was a buck fifty a gallon. Why won't leadership recognize the wars are bankrupting us? Why didn't they take the advice of a real statesman,Holbrook which was to get out of Afganistan who also stated we cannot win in Afghanistan before he died. We are confronting an antagonized public inAfghanistan and now an antagonized public in Pakistan. These nations are far removed from our borders, our fight is over, Osma Bin Laden is dead and the Al Queada is broken, running and hiding. Time to forget about these foreign wars, stop spending borrowed money and concentrate on building here at home in the U.S.A.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mrbucket2 says:
So, I guess this makes us even, somewhat. The communications got so messed up here, it makes you wonder, is that what happened with the information that Osama was living right next door.

Well, since the roads are out, bring the boys/girls home. No more cash or shoulders to cry on. ef em
reply
sallychicago replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
All those Pakistanis demonstrating is benign....they're protesting hoping that we throw some millions of dollars their way and the widows of the soldiers. That will stop the protesting.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
peguesplace says:
Pakistan is using "ghetto logic".. We are being treated like "suckas", only useful for what we can be scammed out of.. Their leaders are a bunch of "gangstas" with no respect for their own people, much less we "infidels" who are avowed enemies of Islam... Pull our troops out, cut off their aid, and to quote Marie Antoinette, "Let them eat cake"...
Yeah, it's inhumane to their starving millions dependent on our food, but just maybe those very people will finally get desperate enough to put out their hookahs and take control of their own destinies....
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
OilGuzzler says:
Big freakin deal who gives a crap they were just pakastanias not humans
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
-LiftingSkirts- says:
Many comments on aid to Pakistan and ending it. Too freakin' logical. Never happen.

We will never get the truth as to what is really going on with Pakistan. The White House and Pentagon feed us a steady diet of misinformation.

The lack of logic in how we deal with Pakistan lends credence to my assumption that misinformation is all we have to go on.

really sucks...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FrixnNuts says:
Can anyone answer why the head of Pakistan's intelligence, Gen. Ahmad of the ISI was doing in Washington DC from Sept. 4th to the 14th, 2001, meeting with top government officials and military brass. This after it was confirmed that he had wired $100,000 to lead hijacker Atta. And can anyone answer why none of this was mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report.
reply
-LiftingSkirts- replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
source please...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bobsniffer says:
Nato troops were under attack from the Pakistani post. Rockets were fired on ISAF troops. Reinforcements were called in, who also confirm this, responded to attacks. Now Pakistanis claim 28 Pakistani "troops" were killed.
Question is, why were these Pakistani "troops" ordered to fire on ISAF??
As usual, no valid response from Pakistani authority but more posturing and media hype.
One can draw an obvious conclusion the Pakistanis wanted to create a situation and hysteria to disrupt the ISAF supply line to increase more pressure on the Obama administration for a pullout, or more compensation to PakMil.
Nothing a few more doallrs won't fix folks. I mean many dozens of Pakistani people are kidnapped or killed by PakMil and their proxy on daily basis in Balochistan, FATA, and elsewhere who are Balochi, Christians, Hindoos, Sikhs, Shia Muslims, Ahmediyas (not considered Muslims by Pak) and Mohajir with impunity and no legal recourse. The government of Pakistan has no real investigation or prosecution effort for thousands of honor killings or for the rape victims still languishing in jails. Pakistan is a very poor human rights record and with 180 million mouths to feed needs to become a responsible and an honest broker with its own people and with other nations, away from nefarious terrorism activity.
reply
hamiltongrad replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
that about says it all. We are dealing with a barbaric backward nation of idiots, who are our enemy. Let's remember the so called Bush Doctrine. We are the most powerful nation on earth. We need to free our own resources so that we are not in any way dependent on such crazies. We need to be strong, as our system is the best - Democracy, Capitalism and Caring,
linkicon reporticon emailicon
farbemeister says:
Perhaps we should start supplying the NATO troops through Iran. Seems much easier.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
farbemeister says:
A very well coordinated mistake.
reply
See all 22 Comments