U.S., U.K., Canada slap Iran with new sanctions
Iran's biggest denominational currencies, 100,000 Rials (then worth $8.9 U.S.) and 50,000 Rials (then worth $4.45 U.S.) are seen April 11, 2011, in Tehran, Iran. / AFP/Getty Images
Updated at 5:18 p.m. ET
WASHINGTON - The Obama administration cobbled together a new set of best-available sanctions against Iran on Monday that underlined its limited capacity to force Tehran to halt its suspected nuclear weapons program. The U.S. action was coordinated with Britain and Canada, but not with countries such as Russia and China that have far greater economic investments in the Islamic republic.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner were to present the American measures later in the day, and officials said they would target Iranian companies, the hardline Revolutionary Guard force and Iran's petrochemicals sector. The restrictions are not expected to break new ground, instead representing a piecemeal addition to several rounds of American measures already in place to isolate Iran's economy.
The American dilemma is twofold: After the three decades of economic estrangement and escalating pressure on Tehran for its dismal human rights record and alleged support for terrorism, the United States has few tools left to coerce or penalize the Iranian regime. And Washington is unlikely to authorize a military strike anytime soon, conscious that an attack may delay but not stop Iran from developing the bomb and fearful of the political fallout at a time when the U.S. is flailing in debt and trying to transition from conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Activity at alleged Iran nuke site creates buzz
West says Iran deceives world on nukes
West, Russia compromise on Iran nuke resolution
Still, Monday's coordinated actions among the United States and its two close allies represent the first direct response to a recent report by the U.N. nuclear agency suggesting Iranian work toward the development of atomic weapons. The report's release has sparked frenzied international diplomacy over how to halt the Iranian threat, including speculation in the U.S., Europe and Israel on the merits of a military intervention.
For the Obama administration, even the sanctions route is constrained. The United Nations has passed four rounds of global sanctions against Iran since 2006, but veto-wielding nations Russia and China stand in the way of any further action. And even unilaterally, American officials have held back from blanketing all of Iran's fuel-related exports and its central bank with sanctions, for fear of spiking world oil prices and hampering the American economic recovery.
A little more than a week ago, President Barack Obama pressed Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Chinese President Hu Jintao to join the U.S. and its partners in taking action — to no avail.
Britain's new restrictions included an order that its financial institutions cease doing business with all Iranian banks, including the central bank and extending to all branches and subsidiaries. It amounted to what was termed an unprecedented British attempt to cut off an entire country's banking industry off from the U.K. financial sector.
The sanctions are aimed at "preventing the Iranian regime from acquiring nuclear weapons," British Treasury chief George Osborne said. He said they also were designed to shield Britain's financial sector from exposure to Iranian money laundering and terrorism financing, without offering specifics. A statement made no references to Washington's allegation of an Iranian plot to assassinate Saudi Arabia's ambassador to the United States.
Canada was also expected to announce new measures against Iran, while France urged fellow European countries and Japan to stop buying Iranian oil and to freeze any assets belonging to Iran's central bank.
Russia, China, India and other nations maintain larger-scale trade with Iran, whose energy exports have helped it shrug off serious harm from the U.N. sanctions and other penalties applied by individual countries or the European Union.
The report released two weeks ago by the International Atomic Energy Agency alleges Iran has been seeking to acquire equipment and weapons design information, testing high explosives and detonators and developing computer models of a warhead's core. It is the strongest evidence yet that the Iranian program ranges far beyond enriching uranium for use in energy and medical research, as Iran's government insists.
The Obama administration has sought to use the evidence as leverage in making its case to other countries that sanctions against Iran should be expanded and tightened. It has argued that further isolating Iran's economy is the best strategy to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, while insisting that the option of using force will not be taken off the table.
The president's strategy is being carried out amid partisan clamor for tougher action against Iran. Leading Republican presidential candidates present themselves as hawkish alternatives to Obama ready to attack Iran's nuclear facilities. They've also tried to strip away Obama's support among Jewish and some evangelical voters by pledging stronger solidarity with Israel, which sees Iran and its nuclear program as a mortal threat.
Mitt Romney spoke openly at the Republicans' Nov. 12 foreign policy debate about working with insurgents to try to overthrow Iran's government, while rival Newt Gingrich demanded increased covert action to foil its uranium enrichment activity. The program has been hindered in recent years by the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists, a virulent computer virus and other possible interference — which may or may not have been the result of covert American or Israeli activity.
The new penalties were being announced one day ahead of another Republican debate focused on foreign policy.
In Congress, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell proposed an amendment last week to the U.S. defense budget to sanction Iran's Central Bank beyond existing U.S. sanctions. That might be difficult because it would also penalize European, Asian and other companies conducting business with the bank and also operating in the United States. Some fear it could drive up oil prices as well and cause havoc to world markets.
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Photos of the week 22 Photos
- Pope Francis takes aim at the Mafia
- Massive loss of life in Brazil nightclub fire
- Boston Marathon winner gives medal back
- Rockets hit Hezbollah stronghold in Beirut
- New U.K. task force to tackle radical Muslim clerics
- Graphic video: Man dead in "truly shocking" London attack Play Video
- French soldier attacker still on the run
No more payments to China on U.S. debt and no more trading with either until they decide to get on the right side.
Nuclear weapons are a thing of the past and can do nothing but make the world that much worse. Nuclear weapons in the hands of the Iranians is not only going to be a tragedy in the end but probably the end of man kind because of their radical Islamic beliefs.
Stop the PR and fix the problems and I don't think sanctions are going to get it done after 31 yrs of trying!
NEVER-ENDING DESTRUCTION BY WARPED/DELUSIONAL RELIGIOUS THINKING
If we only had REAL COURAGEOUS World Leaders to convey to the people, that religious 'reasoning', was ONCE important when;
there was no university education
there were hardly any foundations of knowledge
there was only rudimentary science,
et al, ancient men created all sorts of fabrications as explanations for being, purpose, future, etc, thereby conjuring up their highly-subjective systems and brand-named religions and symbols,
... we will then have a REAL AND GENUINE Hallelujah to celebrate!
Even God is fed up with religion and the crippling, deadly, destructive mindsets that religious thinking creates!
As stated:
"If we only had REAL COURAGEOUS World Leaders ..."
The world cannot trust the current Iranian regime whose leaders are purposed to impose/force, and continue to export and spread their religious beliefs onto ALL others...
---
Christians in the US have the same design.
What's the dif?
However, it appears that some religious movements, sects and subsects or offshoots, and even some classified as cults, are in different(violent, irrational, destructive with death wishes and all!) stages.
Is one religion or religious movement better than another?
Perhaps rephrased as: Which religion is WORSE than the other?
Still, religion is not good news.
b) Israel and Arab countries sat together today at the IAEA meeting discussing making Middle Eastern a "nuclear weapon free" zone .. Iran was invited by boycotted.
---
One question: Did Israel offer to turn over its 200-300 illegal nukes?
I DO have a problem with them doing so while turning a blind eye to Israel's illegal nukes.