AP/ November 2, 2011, 8:28 AM

Japan's Fukushima reactor may have new problem

TOKYO, Japan - Workers unload metallic drums from a truck as part of the process to discover and remove radioactive material believed to be buried underground near a supermarket in Tokyo's Setagaya Ward.

TOKYO, Japan - Workers unload metallic drums from a truck as part of the process to discover and remove radioactive material believed to be buried underground near a supermarket in Tokyo's Setagaya Ward. / AP

TOKYO - Radioactive particles associated with nuclear fission have been detected at Japan's tsunami-damaged atomic power plant, officials said Wednesday, suggesting one of its reactors could have a new problem.

The fresh concerns at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear facility came as a reactor in southern Japan was restarted and brought back online, marking a first since the March 11 disaster created an outcry over the safety of Japan's nuclear power sites.

Japan nuke radiation higher than estimated
Nuke plants' generator failures draw scrutiny
Special Section: Disaster in Japan

Utility officials said gas from inside the Fukushima plant's No. 2 reactor indicated the presence of radioactive xenon, which could be the byproduct of unexpected nuclear fission. Boric acid was injected through a cooling pipe as a precaution because it can counteract nuclear reactions.

Tokyo Electric Power Co., or TEPCO, said there was no rise in the reactor's temperature or pressure. The company said the radioactive materials had not reached the point when nuclear reactions are self-sustaining and the detection of the xenon would have no major impact on workers' efforts to keep the reactor cool and stable.

Because the half-life of the isotopes detected is short, the xenon was likely created recently. But officials said the level was so low that further tests would be required to confirm the measurements were not an error.

"We have confirmed that the reactor is stable and we don't believe this will have any impact on our future work," said TEPCO spokesman Osamu Yokokura. He said no radiation leaks outside the plant were detected.

Hiroyuki Imari, a spokesman with the Nuclear Industrial Safety Agency, said the detection of the gas was not believed to indicate a major problem, but its cause was being investigated.

The plant is the site of the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl in 1986. A 12-mile exclusion zone has been in effect since the earthquake and tsunami crippled the facility northeast of Tokyo, sending three of its reactors into meltdowns, touching off fires and triggering several explosions.

TEPCO had reported significant progress toward stabilizing the facility, saying that it has essentially reached a "cold shutdown," meaning the temperatures at the reactors are constant and controlled.

Even so, a Japanese government panel says it will take at least 30 years to safely decommission the facility.

The Fukushima disaster has severely impacted Japan's nuclear power supply.

Forty-three of Japan's 54 reactors are now suspended for inspections or mechanical troubles and public opposition to restarting them since the disaster has cast doubts on the nation's overall nuclear future.

Before the tsunami, Japan relied on nuclear power for about one-third of its electricity. If power companies cannot win local approval, which is required to restart reactors shut down for glitches or inspections, all of Japan's plants could be offline by next May.

But, in a first since the disaster, a nuclear reactor in southern Japan has resumed operation after a monthlong shutdown for a technical problem. A reactor in Hokkaido, northern Japan, was brought back online in August, but it had not been completely shut down and was out of commercial service only for a regular inspection.

The Kyushu Electric Power Co. says No. 4 reactor at the Genkai nuclear power plant in southern Japan restarted late Tuesday and was generating electricity Wednesday. It automatically shut down Oct. 4 following an abnormality in a steam condenser, but that didn't cause any radiation leaks or injuries.

The reactor will be closed again in January for routine inspections.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
7 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
eddy_4 says:
The recorded activity was 1.2 x 10^-5 Bq/cm^3 (http://enenews.com/press-conference-nuclear-fission-may-also-be-happening-in-reactors-no-1-and-3-curium-mentioned-more)

There is more activity in a cm^3 of a banana containing a natural concentration of K-40.

Re-criticality could be a possible issue, however, basic precautionary procedures (neutron poison injection) should be all that is necessary.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
samXXkiley says:
coucou,
after the disaster and so far TEPCO has not been convincing,
all these statements about the state of the reactors are evasive and sometimes false
"au revoir"
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
questCorp says:
Correct - You cannot trust the officials in this case because they protect their own interests. The Japanese people are not happy - and they see right through the smoke and mirrors.

Everyone knows a larger portion of Japanese soil is not suitable for habitation. Just last month a leaked Tepco documented indicated the total amount of plutonium and neptunium emitted from the plant. This stuff sticks around for millions of years...

If you haven't seen the dispersion maps for plutonium they are published here (you can click cancel at the login):

http://www.datapoke.org/partmom/a=114
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gruven13777 says:
After the 3-core meltdown was covered up over there, does anyone even believe anything they read in the media about this topic anymore?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
karek40 says:
Is building a nuclear reactor where earthquakes occur at regular (even 25 or 50 year) intervals a sign of man's ignorance, arrogance or greed. All of the above.
reply
retiredgustav replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Remember the Titanic, "God him self could not sink this ship"!
eddy_4 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Its funny, the plant survived the earthquake just fine. A highly erroneous decision on generator placement caused this problem.

Either way, how do you propose Japan go about supplying their energy demands?