AP/ March 14, 2013, 10:14 PM

Convictions of woman on Ariz. death row overturned

This undated image provided by the Arizona Department of Corrections shows Debra Jean Milke, who has been on Arizona's death row for nearly 20 years for plotting her 4-year-old son's murder.

This undated image provided by the Arizona Department of Corrections shows Debra Jean Milke, who has been on Arizona's death row for nearly 20 years for plotting her 4-year-old son's murder. / AP Photo/Arizona Department of Corrections, File

PHOENIX A federal appeals court on Thursday threw out the convictions of a woman sentenced to death in the notorious 1989 killing of her 4-year-old son, ruling that the case was tainted by a detective with a history of lying under oath.

The ruling marked a surprising turn in a case that made national headlines with the brazen and gruesome nature of the crime. Prosecutors said Debra Jean Milke dressed up her son Christopher in his favorite outfit and told him he was going to see Santa Claus at a mall during the holidays.

Instead, he was taken into the desert by her boyfriend and another man and shot three times in the back of the head as part of what prosecutors said was a plot by Milke and the two other defendants to collect a $50,000 life insurance policy.

Milke would have been the first woman executed in Arizona since the 1930s had her appeals run out. The Arizona Supreme Court had gone so far to issue a death warrant for Milke in 1997, but the execution was delayed because she had yet to exhaust federal appeals.

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday that the prosecution failed to disclose information about a history of misconduct by a detective who testified that Milke confessed to plotting her son's murder.

That record included multiple court rulings in other cases that former Detective Armando Saldate Jr. either lied under oath or violated suspects' Miranda rights during interrogations.

Prosecutors are required to provide a defendant's lawyers with material that might support a not guilty verdict, including material that could undermine the credibility of a prosecution witness.

There was no other witness or recording of the purported confession by Milke, who has proclaimed her innocence.

"No civilized system of justice should have to depend on such flimsy evidence, quite possibly tainted by dishonesty or overzealousness, to decide whether to take someone's life or liberty," Chief Justice Alex Kozinski wrote in the decision.

The trial amounted to "a swearing contest" in which the judge and jury ultimately believed the detective over Milke, but they didn't know of his record of dishonesty and misconduct, Kozinski wrote.

The ruling reversed a U.S. District Court judge's ruling and ordered the lower court to require Arizona authorities to turn over all relevant personnel records for the detective.

Once the material is produced and defense lawyers have time to review it, prosecutors will have 30 days to decide whether to retry her. If they don't, she will be released from prison.

Maricopa County prosecutors had yet to read the ruling and had no immediate comment on the decision, spokesman Jerry Cobb said.

But the Arizona Attorney General's Office said it was reviewing the case and will likely file an appeal.

Milke defense lawyer Michael Kimerer was in trial and not immediately available for comment Thursday.

In 2009, Kimerer said his client maintains her innocence and was a loving mother who still grieves her son's death.

"Our main concern is the fact that I have a client that never confessed and a police detective who said she gave a confession," Kimerer said then. "There was no tape recorder, no witnesses, nothing. Just his word."

Milke, 48, is one of three women on death row in Arizona. All three are imprisoned at the state prison for women in Goodyear.

The two men convicted in the Milke's case, Roger Scott and former Milke roommate James Styers, are both on death row at a prison in Florence.

Scott confessed during a police interrogation and led detectives to the boy's body.

But neither Scott or Styers would testify against Milke.

© 2013 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
12 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AZCOP101 says:
Oh the ignorance of the general public!!! She had her 4 year old shot and killed, yet people's hearts still bleed for these scum bags They (especially her) should died a horrible death like their victims. Work one day in SMU (Arizona's death row) and you will want to flip the switch yourself.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
busterthedawgy says:
A number of prisoners serving long prison terms have had their convictions overturned. But this goes the extra mile. This is a death penalty case, and she came close to being executed once. Imagine if she had been executed for a crime she didn't commit. And I suspect that other innocent people have been executed. After they are put to death any investigation stops. Be thankful that she is still alive; she should walk free.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
axiom0001 says:
How could a person be put on death row with such little evidence? Arizona again, nevermind.
I couldn't agree more with KansasCity-2012; public servants that knowingly lie should face consequences for their actions.
If the AG wants to appeal this case then he better bring more evidence, other than the testimony of that detective. I wonder how much money she will get from the civil trail? Whatever it is the money should come from the detective's pay, the prosecutors' pay, the original judge (if he knew about the detective's past), and the rest from maricopa sheriff's department. Isn't this the department that sent a detective to Hawaii to research Obama's birth certificate, after the hospital released a copy of the certificate? I think they have too much of our tax dollars. Arizona, the conservative state, COME ON CONSERVE YOUR MONEY, get these liars to pay for their own mistakes. Don't leave the taxpayer with the bill -- pass a retroactive bill to make public officials liable for the lies they say. I am sure the public will get rich, especially in Arizona. Whatever happened to the fourth branch of government, the people.
reply
VO142857 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You wrote "Arizona again". I would add "Maricopa County, land of Sheriff Joe".
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AIG_LEISHMANIA_DEATH says:
I have L-Donovani, Leishmania. I got this Disease in Kuwait in 2003. I have Documents that shows this. If not Tested an Treated I will Die of Leishmania. AIG is the Insurance Carrier and they will not Approve this War Injury because in 2003, AIG made up False Documents showing that I didn't have Leishmania and that I didn't reported it. KBR sent me home on a Medical, but again AIG states that this person wasn't a Doctor. AIG stills holds all of the Cards.
Look up idri.org, Bill Gates an Warren Buffett owns this Hospital. We have Thousands of others that has L-Donovani! AIG and DOL is keeping it under the Rug for there BONUSES!!
God Bless
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
KansasCity-2012 says:
I would really love a federal constitutional amendment that makes it possible for prosecutors, judges, and testifying public servants found to wrongfully find anyone guilty and sentence someone to a death penalty, can be incarcerated and forced to serve equal penalty of time served and up to and including the execution itself.

Systematically removing anyone's constitutional rights and taking their life can not become so routine that public accountability is waived.

All should know that when going forward into a death penalty prosecution, that any witness, prosecutor, or judge tainting the case or depriving the defendant or jury of sufficient evidence to prevent finding of guilt, or sentencing to an execution, shall waive their own constitutional rights and be forced to serve the equivalent outcome imposed upon their defendant in a wrongful conviction.

It may seem wishful today, but accountability in death penalty cases doesn't to produce warrants to reverse action or overturn all the wrongful convictions that are happening. Good Ole Boy justice needs to result in Good Ole Boys being marched off to serve time in prison and executed. The judicial hunger to produce reputation for tough hard justice has been usurping and abridging the rights of people for too long.
reply
ProsecuteCorruption replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
A "federal constitution amendment" is not required to follow state statutes proscribing corrupt practices by law enforcement agencies. The problem is that these laws are not enforced by higher level law enforcement or the members of the community. Often, this is because the lower level law enforcement intimidates, threatens, or acts in vigilante crimes against those that report them. But, the time has come to engage the United States military when direct threats are made against innocent United States civilians wrongfully accused and unlawfully incarcerated as these acts fall under the category of enemy combatants, that activates military jurisdiction in defense of these civilians under both state and federal constitutions.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Paroquet says:
"But the Arizona Attorney General's Office said it was reviewing the case and will likely file an appeal."--CBS News Report

Atty. General Tom Horne had better hope he's right. Same as Missouri's Chris Koster in a similar case. Same situations in both: Tainted evidence, improper procedure, coerced or no confessions, unreliable witnesses, recanted statements. Come to think of it, the judges involved too had better hope those Atty's Gen. are right for missing all of that in the first place, and convicting people outside the rule of law...by making sure the jurors were misinformed when they knew better to do so.

Yep, for those Atty's Gen. had better be right, or the judges below every decision afterward will reflect on every decision and conviction they've ever made and tarnish the scales of Justice.

Interesting times.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CBSName says:
Remarkable that the two men who were convicted and are on death row wouldn't testify against her. It's likely they were offered a lighter sentence if they agreed to testify against her.
reply
kendb1331 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lighter sentence? They got death.
AZCOP101 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yeah, what the hell are talking about? Comments made by people that have not worked with convicted scum or had personal tragedies of their own. If that was your son, you would be singing a different tune...hug a thug
linkicon reporticon emailicon
imnho says:
Wihout the confessio te case aginist her will likely fall apart
reply
See all 12 Comments