AP/ March 4, 2013, 9:08 PM

U.S. denies Guantanamo hunger strike reports

Towers overlooking a U.S. detention facility are silhouetted against a morning sunrise at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba Oct. 18, 2012, in this picture reviewed by the U.S. Department of Defense.

Towers overlooking a U.S. detention facility are silhouetted against a morning sunrise at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba Oct. 18, 2012, in this picture reviewed by the U.S. Department of Defense. / AP Photo/Toronto Star

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico Lawyers for Guantanamo Bay prisoners said Monday that a widespread hunger strike was under way over deteriorating conditions, but a prison spokesman denied there was any mass protest at the U.S. base in Cuba.

Attorneys for more than a dozen of the prisoners said in a letter to the prison commander, Rear Adm. John Smith, and released to the media that "all but a few men" have been on hunger strike for three weeks. They said the situation "appears to be rapidly deteriorating and reaching a potentially critical level."

The lawyers said the protest was prompted by a series of searches that began on Feb. 6 in which a number of personal items, including religious CDs, blankets and legal mail, were confiscated, and included what they felt were overly intrusive searches of their Qurans by Arabic translators that amounted to desecration.

"As their health has deteriorated, we have received reports of men coughing up blood, being hospitalized, losing consciousness, becoming weak and fatigued, and being moved to Camp V for observation," the lawyers wrote, referring to a camp that is used in part to hold men who violate prison rules.

A prison spokesman, Navy Capt. Robert Durand, said the Department of Justice would respond to the attorney's letter, but added that there were only about six prisoners who have missed enough meals to be classified under the military's rules as being on hunger strike. He said that number has remained constant for about a year.

"There is not a mass hunger strike among the detainees," Durand said. "Some detainees have attempted to coordinate a hunger strike and have refused meal deliveries. Most detainees are not participating."

He said detainees "have chosen one routine search in early February as the rallying point for their grievances." He also said Qurans are treated with respect.

The U.S. holds about 166 men at the prison. A mass hunger strike involved many of the prisoners in the summer of 2005 but the protest dwindled after the military began strapping them down and force-feeding them a liquid nutrient mix to prevent them from starving to death.

© 2013 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
11 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rushin2U says:
Disgusting bunch of comments considering the FACT that none of these people have been charged with ANYTHING.

What goes around comes around. Karma so to say. It catches up sooner or later.

"There is not a mass hunger strike among the detainees," Durand said. "Some detainees have attempted to coordinate a hunger strike and have refused meal deliveries. Most detainees are not participating." Is nothing, but a LIE.

PSYCHOPATHS.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Thanos331 says:
These people are criminals and terrorists! They deserve to be jailed. However, allowing them to starve to death is immoral (for the US government) and an easy way out for the terrorists. They must remain alive and in prison for their crimes. There's a great article here about the biggest challenges that the Obama administration will have to face in 2013: http://news.jeebboo.com/2013/01/31/the-us-is-on-the-threshold-of-a-2nd-obama-term-and-a-jeebboo-survey-defines-america%E2%80%99s-biggest-challenges-for-2013/
reply
Beaner96 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Actually, they deserve to be dead!

It should be their right to refuse to eat and we should honor that right!
rightontarget replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
"allowing them to starve to death is immoral" Really??? It is THEIR CHOICE to go on a hungar strike. What are you gonna do? Force feed them? Give in to their demands? Get real!!! Do you know how much it would cost to take on the problem of forcing them to "remain alive and in prison". THEY ARE NOT WORTH IT! Who cares? They are in GITMO for a REASON because of their own actions. We have enough problems with trying to care for our own, law abiding citizens without thinking we "owe" these criminals anything!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mark648 says:
Since they're consuming less we should appreciate the efforts to help with the sequester.
reply
Beaner96 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Exactly!

If they die, it's an additional bonus!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stamicrach says:
It's their choice if they want to starve themselves to death.

And, the US should not be forced to "respect" the Quran until they start showing some respect for they start showing some respect for our beliefs.

The people are prisoners,!

If the US started treated prisoners differently (Joe Arpaio comes to mind) instead of providing recreation rooms for them, libraries, free health care and fully equipped gyms etc. for the prisoners here in the US; we might actually have fewer criminals.

I got an email the other day directed at Senior citizens.

It said older folks were going to be provided a gun and four bullets.

These older folks should then carefully pick two politicians to shoot.

They would then be sent to prison where they would receive three meals a day, have a roof over their heads for the rest of their lives, free medical care, free dental care as well as the amenities criminals have while incarcerated.

This would be funny, if it were not so true.

There are three very basic rules for life.

They are choice, control and price.

You control your choice; but you must be willing to pay the price for your choice.

So; if the detainees at Gitmo choose to starve themselves; LET EM.!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lakemonk41 says:
The US stole Guantanamo from Cuba. Give it back to its rightful owners.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ulgnud says:
So let them go on a hunger strike. Won't affect a thing except save some money on food.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
highlndr55 says:
Let them starve to death! Good riddance! That way OBAMA could close the place down, 4 years late.
reply
highlndr55 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Grumpy:) You are so right. I stand corrected. Long live Guantanomo!!!
See all 11 Comments