AP/ March 1, 2013, 11:15 PM

Bad "Fresh Prince" rap triggers Pa. lockdown

AMBRIDGE, Pa. Now this is a story all about how a high school student's life got turned upside down. But it was all just a bad rap.

The teen's voicemail greeting triggered a lockdown at his Pennsylvania school after a receptionist misheard his rendition of "The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air" theme song.

While trying to confirm an appointment with 19-year-old Travis Clawson the receptionist thought the message said "shooting people outside of the school." The line is actually "shooting some b-ball," a reference to basketball.

The receptionist called 911 and Economy police arrested Clawson a short time later at Ambridge Area High School, but released him once he explained the message.

Acting police Chief James Mann says police acted "appropriately" out of concern for students' welfare.

Clawson's family has contacted an attorney.

© 2013 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
28 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
BGuss says:
What a ******* receptionist. Did she ever think to confirm what she heard before "crying wolf"? Some people are just so quick to jump on the assumption train these days. Did common sense really leave the building, when people let the internet and social media take hold of their lives? Sad future for humanity.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
LyingPols says:
Democrats have reached a fever pitch of insanity over their gun phobia - and all it gets them is more crime in their stinking cities.
reply
BWB2020 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
So what does an ignorant bagger, who can't tell the difference between "b-ball" and "people", have to do with the ignorance in your post?

I have never heard "people" pronounced "peepall".

As for the cause of crime, it is due to the fact that people need money to survive, but due to right-wing politics, large areas don't have opportunities to legally earn such monies, and also due to the racist nature of right-wing baggers and their predecessors, such opportunities didn't exist for "minorities" even during better times.

More crime in cities? Son, even baggers are crime ridden in their suburban an rural areas, you must either not be keeping up with news, or are intentionally ignorant.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
BrunoBuhr says:
To NineSevenOne I hope you were able to think faster and clearer when on the job. You first didn't comprehend how it happened, and then you rejected procedures put into place to MAKE SURE it wasn't a threat. Other children who have committed violent acts in school have made recordings, posted on Facebook and spoke about what they were going to do. Back to cadet training for you! 6pointssnark that was plain ignorant! That reaction by the receptionist could have saved dozens of lives. BWBDAEVERYDAY I can explain it to you but I can't comprehend it for you! She was Sociopathic for responding to a possible threat? Are you Insane and ignorant? I wish we could sue people for being stupid! In this country you can write violent abusive socially backward pathetic Godless "Rhymes" and expect decent honorable people to put up with it or think that it is something other then what it says it is. That doesn't make those "Rhymes" any more than the pathological self-indulgent criminal logic that it promotes. Your "rhymes" have helped to destroy another generation of young black men & women. SuperMaggot..."crimes happens people die "when it is promoted and accepted as a way of life. You want to live in a sewer social structure thats your choice! "Not so bad"??? You may think that's life, you are wrong, try joining humanity.
reply
BWB2020 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
So, "playing b-ball" is a threat?

Yes she is ignorant, and so are you, if you posit that her ignorance is justification for ruining the lives of others.

@"truthis", what ruins the lives of young African Americans is the fact that their parents and grandparents were systematically excluded from equal participation in the US economy, denied jobs, paid less when they do get them, and shown such hatred by baggers, their sucker sycophants, the police, and even by the Uncle Toms who sucked their way up from poverty.

"Ho's" have been with all cultures since time immemorial, the Irish, Italian, and Jewish mafias were all street gangs, Bush ordered idiot murder in Afghanistan and Iraq for reasons that were known lies, they are the most deadly gangs on all the streets of the earth, yet I don't read your condemnation of all Irish or Italians due to those gangs, nor do I see your umbrage at Bush's genocidal thug tactics.

Both of you baggers are the problem, and, typical of your ilk, try to point the finger at others for the by-product of your own ASPD-afflicted culture.
nine7one replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
BRUNOBUHR,

Alright, I admit you got me with that one. If I made a similar mistake while testifying in court the prosecutor would have read me the riot act once we were behind closed doors. And upon considering the matter further I'll also admit, given recent events, it was not outlandish for the school employee to react as she did. And yes, we did routinely tell people they should never hesitate in calling 911, even if they were unsure about what they saw or heard. In my defense, I am retired so I plead senility.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
shilohnboots says:
The secretary acted responsibly, given what she thought the message said. I'm sorry, but some people do not speak or write very intelligibly, and it can sound even worse recorded. And the police, whom so many people are quick to accuse, acted correctly for the report they received. People get so quick to judge what they aren't present to hear or witness, and get nasty about it; people are quick to see if they can make money out of situations. Shame on the parents for setting that example. The 19 yr old is considered of legal age; his mommy and daddy are seeking financial gain from this, and getting their 15 minutes?
reply
BWB2020 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The secretary was ignorant and irresponsible.

"B-ball" is a long-known term for basketball, and has been for at least half a century. What she may have thought she heard was no cause for ruining the police record of someone who before her ignorance had a clean arrest record.

The police were ignorant, if they did not request to hear the actual message themselves, to determine if they should ruin the life of a young man.

His parents might well seek compensation, and well they should, because now every job application their son fills out will have a tick in the box about ever having been arrested, potential employers won't wait to hear the explanation.

Sue them until they bleed, and if you happen to live in the city that has to pay, then pay up, your support of ignorance should cost you some extra tax dollars.

No matter how it turns out, the young man's job prospects have been diminished from "less probable" to "not possible" due to such ignorance, those who made it happen should now become the income for that young man throughout his lifetime.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nine7one says:
Is Common-Sense no longer authorized in this country? How about this scenario as an alternative to what actually happened:

-Receptionist believes she hears a student singing about shooting people at school.

-Receptionist says, "What did you just say?"

-Student says, "Shooting some b-ball outside the school"

-Receptionist says, "Oh, I thought you said something else"

Problem averted.
reply
nine7one replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Sorry, I missed the part about it her hearing it in a recorded message, so change my response to:

-Receptionist asks other people in her office to listen to the message.

-Someone who hears it says, "That's the theme song from 'Fresh Prince of Belair, he's talking about basketball.

Once again, problem averted.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hypnotoad72 says:
In this day and age, it's better NOT to take any chances.

It's doubly pathetic, because NOT EVERYBODY WATCHES TELEVISION.

Are school admins now supposed to be consciously aware of every TV show - and if someone parodies it not to be bothered? (And WHAT IF the miscreants are using codewords?)

I'll side with the lockdown. There's enough reasonable plausibility.

It's better to have a false positive... than a false negative.

Quite simple, really...

But I know some will whine and complain and whinny regardless of the situation.
reply
mason8181 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
YOU'RE RIGHT! WHAT IF the miscreants are using codewords?! Any time anyone says anything we should assume it's a codeword just to be safe! Right?! For the children!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
foo8259 says:
Can he now be un-arrested?
reply
nine7one replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
That's the worst part of this whole thing. I'm a retired police officer so I can tell you that there is no such thing as "un-arresting" someone. Once the magic words, "you're under arrest" are said, the only way it can be rectified is through the court system or if the local prosecutor, or district attorney declines to prosecute the case due to a lack of evidence.

That may sound great, but here's the kick-in-the-ass-part; for the remainder of that person's life, whenever they fill out an application or legal form that asks the question, "Have you ever been arrested?", they are obligated to answer, "Yes", and explain the situation. If they choose to spend several thousand dollars and hire an attorney they can have the case expunged from the record, in which case they will legally be able to answer, "No" in most situations UNLESS they are applying for any job in law enforcement or a government security clearance, in which case they are still required to divulge the information.

If a cop really did place the kid under arrest he should lose his or her job. There are things like an "investigative detention" or even a simple, "stop and hold" that exist solely so the officer can keep someone in their custody until such time as the relevent facts of the matter become known.
axg2013 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The student has been released as per the story...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ESchwartzE says:
A 19 year old is a child?
reply
hypnotoad72 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
*bingo*
Aussie_convict replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I see the words "teen", "student", "19 year old", in the article, can you please point out exactly where it says "child"?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
This_is_insane says:
Any which way or angle you look at it is funny.

A !School! administrator/employee to stupid to listen.
Parents ready to sue.
The kid's outgoing message to start with..
....and on and on.
Free entertainment I guess,
You get what you paid for ! Zero !
reply
hypnotoad72 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Huh?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
corbolavirus says:
Americans are becoming permanent retards.
reply
Beaner96 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Liberal Democrats started out that way!
See all 28 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right