prev
next
U.S. a step closer to wide domestic use of drones
September 2011 photo provided by Vanguard Defense Industries shows ShadowHawk drone with Montgomery County, Texas, SWAT team members. / AP
WASHINGTON A future in which unmanned drones are as common in U.S. skies as helicopters and airliners has moved a step closer to reality with a government request for proposals to create six drone test sites around the country.
The Federal Aviation Administration made the request Thursday, kicking off what is anticipated to be an intense competition among states hoping to win one of the sites.
The FAA also posted online a draft plan for protecting people's privacy from the eyes in the sky. The plan would require each test site to follow federal and state laws and make a privacy policy publicly available.
Privacy advocates worry that a proliferation of drones will lead to a "surveillance society" in which the movements of Americans are routinely monitored, tracked, recorded and scrutinized by authorities.
The military has come to rely heavily on drones overseas. Now there is tremendous demand to use drones in the U.S. for all kinds of tasks that are too dirty, dull or dangerous for manned aircraft.
Drones, which range from the size of a hummingbird to the high-flying Global Hawks that weigh about 15,000 pounds without fuel, also are often cheaper than manned aircraft. The biggest market is expected to be state and local police departments.
Industry experts predict the takeoff of a multibillion-dollar market for civilian drones as soon as the FAA completes regulations to make sure they don't pose a safety hazard to other aircraft.
Surveillance drones
Potential civilian users are as varied as the drones themselves. Power companies want them to monitor transmission lines. Farmers want to fly them over fields to detect which crops need water. Ranchers want them to count cows. Film companies want to use drones to help make movies. Journalists are exploring drones' newsgathering potential.
The FAA plans to begin integrating drones starting with small aircraft weighing less than about 55 pounds. The agency forecasts an estimated 10,000 civilian drones will be in use in the U.S. within five years.
The FAA is required by a law enacted a year ago to develop sites where civilian and military drones can be tested in preparation for integration into U.S. airspace that's currently limited to manned aircraft.
The law also requires that the FAA allow drones wide access to U.S. airspace by 2015, but the agency is behind schedule on that.
The test sites are planned to evaluate what requirements are needed to ensure the drones don't collide with planes or endanger people or property on the ground. Remotely controlled drones don't have a pilot who can see other aircraft the way an onboard plane or helicopter pilot can.
There's also concern that links between drones and their on-the-ground operators can be broken or hacked, causing the operator to lose control of the aircraft.
"This research will give us valuable information about how best to ensure the safe introduction of this advanced technology into our nation's skies," Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said in a statement.
The test sites are also expected to boost the local economy of the communities where they are located.
Customs and Border Patrol uses drones along the U.S.-Mexico border. And the FAA has granted several hundred permits to universities, police departments and other government agencies to use small, low-flying drones. For example, the sheriff's department in Montgomery County, Texas, has a 50-pound ShadowHawk helicopter drone intended to supplement its SWAT team.
The sheriff's department hasn't armed its drone, although the ShadowHawk can be equipped with a 40 mm grenade launcher and a 12-guage shotgun. The prospect of armed drones patrolling U.S. skies has alarmed some lawmakers and their constituents. More than a dozen bills have been introduced in Congress and state legislatures to curb drone use and protect privacy.
President Obama was asked Thursday about concerns that the administration believes it's legal to strike American citizens abroad with drones and whether that's allowed against citizens in the U.S.
"There's never been a drone used on an American citizen on American soil," the president said, speaking during an online chat sponsored by Google in which he was promoting his policy initiatives.
"We respect and have a whole bunch of safeguards in terms of how we conduct counterterrorism operations outside of the United States. The rules outside of the United States are going to be different than the rules inside the United States, in part because our capacity, for example, to capture terrorists in the United States are very different than in the foothills or mountains of Afghanistan or Pakistan."
He said he would work with Congress to make sure the American public understands "what the constraints are, what the legal parameters are, and that's something that I take very seriously."
Earlier this week, an FAA official told a meeting of potential test site bidders that aviation regulations prohibit dropping anything from an aircraft, which could be interpreted to bar arming civilian drones, according to an industry official present at the meeting who requested anonymity because he wasn't authorized to speak publicly.
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Powerball frenzy locks down most possible number combos
- Probe begins after Conn. commuter trains collide
- O.J. Simpson's ex-lawyer contradicts his testimony on guns
- Seven-time lottery winner shares secret to winning Powerball
- Why marry? Three generations tell their wedding stories
- Dozens injured as commuter trains collide in Conn.
- New Yorker's Strongbox: Can it shield anonymous sources?
- Texas tornado survivors start to return home
Most Popular
-
01
-
02
-
03
-
04
-
05
Most Shared
Most Discussed
Let me say that again "the suspicion" with NO due process. That's unconstitutional in so many ways. You need to do some more research.
Makes relevant reading after this news item.
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
http://www.george-orwell.org/1984/0.html
DHS already conducted tests showing these UAV/UAS are infact vulernable to remote control and radar jamming exploits. Yet they are still being relased into our airspace?
Given all the government websites that have been hacked lately, what makes these any more secure? Could they even catch a hacker using one of these as a weapon or even detect the location? Unlikely.
It's a stiff deadline for FAA to meet and they're running out of time, I think this is a compromise of security, espescially if the signals aren't strongly encrypted, with poorly constructed transponders by incompetent manufacturers/developers with no hackibility tests at all, just standard crackable encryption and they call it 'secure'.
What if the people that are saying they are secure are just paid off to say that to meet deadline goals?
Please read this article for more information about regulations, the time is drawing near where domestic drone licenses will be granted,and that's a thousand vulnerable-jammable target seeking missles in our airspace.
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/02/drone-regulation/
Says whom? The people wanting to not put out wages for people to do the work? More "lazy Americans" and the rest of the cant?
What are they going to do when people start shooting them down because they are flying over PRIVATE PROPERTY? Is the Obama government going to prosecute those that bring one down and if so, on what grounds?
This is not Obama's private police state yet but with his shredding the Constitution more and more it is getitng lcose.
The illegals are readily exploited and extorted by big biz... and yet you don't care about that.
Private property? You pay taxes on it, right? ...