AP/ February 11, 2013, 5:32 PM

DNA evidence frees Texas man convicted in '81 stabbing death

CORSICANA, Texas A 58-year-old Texas man was allowed to walk free Monday after spending half his life behind bars for a crime he didn't commit -- the repeated stabbing of a woman whose body was found on a dirt road in rural North Texas.

Randolph Arledge, left, speaks to one of his attorneys, Innocence Project co-director Barry Scheck, before a court hearing in Corsicana, Texas, Feb. 11, 2013.

/ AP

Randolph Arledge was sentenced to 99 years in prison in 1984 for killing Carolyn Armstrong. But a state district judge in Corsicana, about 50 miles southeast of Dallas, agreed with prosecutors and Arledge's attorneys that he could no longer be considered guilty after new DNA tests tied someone else to the crime.

Judge James Lagomarsino agreed to release Arledge while the process of overturning his conviction is pending. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals must accept Lagomarsino's recommendation for the conviction to be formally overturned, a process that is considered a formality.

Arledge was wearing shackles around his wrists and ankles at the start of the hearing. He later was taken into a back room by two deputies to have the shackles removed. When he returned, Arledge hugged his two children. His daughter was 4 years old and his son 7 when he was sent to prison.

Armstrong's body was found in August 1981 on a rural dirt road in Navarro County, according to a court filing by Arledge's attorneys. She had been stripped naked from the waist down and stabbed more than 40 times.

Her abandoned car was found miles away with several pieces of evidence, including a black hairnet on the left side of the driver's seat. Hair taken from that net was preserved for three decades. In 2011, more advanced DNA testing linked a hair sample to someone else.

Armstrong's relatives declined to comment Monday.

Like many wrongfully convicted inmates, Arledge was sent to prison with the help of faulty eyewitness testimony. Two co-conspirators in an armed robbery testified at his trial that he had admitted to stabbing someone in Corsicana and that he had blood on his clothes and knife, according to the filing by Arledge's attorneys.

One of those witnesses has since admitted to lying about Arledge due to a personal dispute, the filing said.

Arledge became the 118th person in Texas state courts to have his conviction overturned, according to the University of Michigan's national registry of exonerations.

State lawmakers have passed several measures to try to prevent wrongful convictions. Texas now has a law allowing all inmates convicted of a crime to seek new DNA testing. It also has the nation's most generous law for ex-inmates who have proven their innocence, providing a lump-sum payment of $80,000 for each year someone wrongly spent behind bars, as well as an annuity and other benefits.

© 2013 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
16 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
zorroaca44 says:
You can't win for losing ... you have this poor soul convicted wrongly by overzealous prosecutors ... and you Have Casey Anthony walking the streets because of 12 idiots .....
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Stopfmg says:
DNA analysis has been around way too long for these men to be languishing in prison this long. Why can't they do the necessary DNA testing on all the cases with DNA evidence NOW!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rzarc2 says:
routan1 replies: This is a primary reason why we should be absolutely certain we have the right guy before we throw the switch.
--------------------------------------------------------
Between poor police work, inability of many accused to afford investigators, and the occasional lying prosecutor why take the chance? The DP is a nice concept but has failed too often. Plus I really don't like America, the supposed bastion of freedom being in the same rank as Iran and NK in killing off its citizens.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stopkillingourwilderness says:
gee, texas, you pretend you are being so responsible with the taxpayers' money but you not only have to pay this guy 2.4 million bucks, but you already paid ~$1.6 million incarcerating the guy and probably another $200K trying him, and now you still need to go get the guy who did the crime and start over. "we're cheap but at least we're sloppy" is not a state motto you should be quite so proud of...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
meridella says:
It isn't just Texas' prosecutors and judges willing to let innocent people languish in their prisons and death rows. Its the citizens of the state who are more than willing to tolerate and defend it, blaming the hapless convict for a range of things like being poor or being in the wrong place at the wrong time onward to the company they keep and with an expectation that the share in the omniscience of the divine. Unfortunately those beliefs have spread like flesh eating contagion into other states.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
djberson says:
I know the poor guy needs the money and rightfully deserves it. But wouldn't it be great for him to be in the position to tell them to shove the 80 grand where the sun never shines? Or better yet, to donate it to a cause devoted to fighting abuse in the courts.
reply
mysticstone replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
$80K per year times 29 years is over $2M!!!
BigAl3467 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Actually, that's $80,000 per year of wrongful imprisonment... not sure he's going to want to say no to $2.4m.... but regardless, no amount of money would make up for what this guy and his family have gone through. Dreadful miscarriage of justice - and just another symptom of getting convictions at the expense of finding the truth.
And let's not forget the victim's family, who now live with the fact that the real perpetrator was never found and held to account for this heinous crime. Bad job all round.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
enlightenu says:
I wonder if their law is generous enough to allow the executed to request DNA testing.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gadfly65 says:
Eyewitness testimony is too subjective even with honest witnesses; our courts need to give much more weight to forensic science.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Alberich873 says:
Up! sorry.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rzarc2 says:
This is a primary reason why the death penalty should be banned. Once you execute a person their is no reversing the decision and in far too many cases the wrong person has been convicted.
reply
routan1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
This is a primary reason why we should be absolutely certain we have the right guy before we throw the switch.
VO142857 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Once you arrest soneone, accuse of crime, and throw in jail, irrepairable harm has been done. We should abolish ALL punishments until we make sure no innocent person is ever arrested, not even mentioning trials and convictions.
See all 16 Comments