CBS/AP/ February 10, 2013, 9:14 AM

Joe Paterno's family begins reputation repair work

In this Nov. 9, 2011, file photo, former Penn State Coach Joe Paterno and his wife, Sue Paterno, stand on their porch to thank supporters gathered outside their home in State College, Pa.

In this Nov. 9, 2011, file photo, former Penn State Coach Joe Paterno and his wife, Sue Paterno, stand on their porch to thank supporters gathered outside their home in State College, Pa. / AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File

STATE COLLEGE, Pa. A new report commissioned by Joe Paterno's family challenges the conclusion by former FBI director Louis Freeh that the late Penn State coach conspired to hide child sex abuse allegations against former defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky.

25 Photos

Joe Paterno, 1926-2012

The Paterno family's critique, released Sunday, argues that the findings of the Freeh report published last July were unsupported by the facts.

Former U.S. Attorney General Dick Thornburgh, one of the experts assembled by the family's lawyer to review Freeh's report last year to Penn State, said the document was fundamentally flawed and incomplete.

Freeh's report reached "inaccurate and unfounded findings related to Mr. Paterno and its numerous process-oriented deficiencies was a rush to injustice and calls into question" the investigation's credibility, Thornburgh was quoted as saying.

Last week, Sue Paterno started a campaign to repair husband Joe's battered image with a letter sent Friday to former Penn State players.

She wrote: "When the Freeh report was released last July, I was as shocked as anyone by the findings and by Mr. Freeh's extraordinary attack on Joe's character and integrity. I did not recognize the man Mr. Freeh described. I am here to tell you as definitively and forcefully as I know how that Mr. Freeh could not have been more wrong in his assessment of Joe."

Sue Paterno said neither Freeh's report, nor the NCAA's actions, should "close the book" on the scandal.

In a statement released Sunday through a spokesman, Freeh defended his work.

"I stand by our conclusion that four of the most powerful people at Penn State failed to protect against a child sexual predator harming children for over a decade," he said.

Paterno's family released what it billed as an exhaustive response to Freeh's work, based on independent analyses, on the website paterno.com.

23 Photos

Jerry Sandusky gets 30 to 60 years in prison

"We conclude that the observations as to Joe Paterno in the Freeh report are unfounded, and have done a disservice not only to Joe Paterno and the university community," the family's report said, "but also to the victims of Jerry Sandusky and the critical mission of educating the public on the dangers of child sexual victimization."

Freeh's findings also implicated former administrators including university president Graham Spanier, athletic director Tim Curley and retired vice president Gary Schultz. Less than two weeks after the Freeh report was released in July, the NCAA acted with uncharacteristic speed in levying massive sanctions against the football program for the scandal.

"Taking into account the available witness statements and evidence, it is more reasonable to conclude that, in order to avoid the consequences of bad publicity, the most powerful leaders at Penn State University — Messrs. Spanier, Schultz, Paterno and Curley — repeatedly concealed critical facts relating to Sandusky's child abuse" from authorities, trustees and the university community, Freeh wrote in releasing the report.

The former administrators have vehemently denied the allegations. So, too, has Paterno's family, though it reserved more extensive comment until its own report was complete.

The counter-offensive began in earnest this weekend. The family's findings said that Paterno:

  • Never asked or told anyone not to investigate an allegation against Sandusky 12 years ago, Saturday, Feb. 9, 2001.
  • Never asked or told former administrators not to report the 2001 allegation.
  • And never asked or told anyone not to discuss or hide information reported by graduate assistant Mike McQueary about the 2001 allegation.
  • "Paterno reported the information to his superior(s) pursuant to his understanding of university protocol and relied upon them to investigate and report as appropriate," the family's analysis said.

    Freeh, in his report, said his team conducted 430 interviews and analyzed over 3.5 million emails and documents. The former federal judge said evidence showed Paterno was involved in an "active agreement to conceal" and his report cited email exchanges, which referenced Paterno, between administrators about allegations against Sandusky in 1998 and 2001.

    Sandusky, 69, was sentenced to at least 30 years in prison in October after being convicted last summer of 45 criminal counts. Prosecutors said assaults occurred off and on campus, including the football building.

    His arrest in November 2011 triggered the turmoil that led to Paterno's firing days later. Under pressure, Spanier left as president the same day. Curley was placed on administrative leave, while Schultz retired.

    Spanier, Curley and Schultz are awaiting trial on obstruction and conspiracy, among other charges. They have maintained their innocence.

    Critics have said that Freeh's team didn't speak with key figures including Curley, Schultz and Paterno, who died in January 2012 at age 85. The authors of the emails referenced in Freeh's report, which included Curley and Schultz, were not interviewed by Freeh, the family's analysis said.

    Spanier spoke to Freeh six days before the report was released July 12.

    "They missed so many key people. They didn't interview most of the key players, with the exception of President Spanier, who at the last minute we brought in and interviewed at a time when frankly the report ... was pretty well all prepared," Thornburgh said on the video.

    Freeh said he respected the family's right to conduct a campaign to "shape the legacy of Joe Paterno," but called the critique self-serving. Paterno's attorney was contacted for an interview the coach, he said, and Paterno spoke with a reporter and biographer before his death but not Freeh's team.


    1/2

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
21 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Bierfest60 says:
To anyone supporting the Freeh Report's veracity: have you actually read the report in its entirety and studied basic logic? To those detractors of the Critique of Freeh's manifesto: have you read that document either?

The "logic" in the report IS full of conjecture and ambiguities. Indeed, the report starts not with a conclusion but with an assertion of culpability which it then attempts to "prove". Basic logic should start with a premise, gather facts, weigh alternatives, then put forward the most likely solution/conclusion. The critique differs significantly from the report by doing what a logical approach should do.

It even examines the possibility that Joe knew in 1998. It further asks what he could have known, a) Sandusky was accused, b) Sandusky was investigated, c) Sandusky was cleared and never charged. So stop using 1998 as an excuse to bash anyone in any of your discussions.

Regarding the 2001 incident, please remember that the jury has not even been convened. The true facts are unknown and key witnesses have not had their say under oath.

I ask all you haters and bashers just to read the reports before you stick your foot in your mouth and show your ignorance. (Ignorance = lack of knowledge)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
michaelamsterdam says:
I feel for Mrs Paterno and for the rest of his family and his many friends who cannot bring themselves to believe he could be guilty of shielding a pedophile

Joe Paterno was a truly great college football coach...a beloved and respected mentor to a legion of young men who still believe that he could walk on water

But Joe Paterno made a choice... he had an opportunity to forever be remembered as a truly great MAN...but he blew it...

Once he KNEW what Sandusky had been doing, back in 1999, he was morally and legally obligated to report the criminal abuse...TO THE POLICE...to put the welfare of young victims who'd had their childhoods brutally stolen ahead of his "legacy"

But he did not...

Instead, he abandoned them to their fate, and far worse...left Sandusky at liberty to select and groom new victims from the target-rich environment he had created for himself with 2nd Mile Foundation

Did he imagine that Sandusky would cease raping children because he (Paterno) had become aware of his crimes? Not very likely...pedophiles are masters of blackmail and coercion. Sandusky correctly surmised that the school's leaders and Paterno wouldn't talk, but would circle the wagons...to protect him.

If JoePa had demanded that Sandusky be fired and turned over for prosecution, it might have been strenuously objected to...but it would have been done, because nobody at Penn State could tell Joe Paterno "no" about anything!

Many would contend that it was somehow unfair that all this should be dumped on Paterno's shoulders, as he had nothing to do with molesting young boys...but life is often unfair.

That he continued to work alongside Sandusky AFTER he knew what he was and what he was doing, confirms his guilt

Claiming that he notified university officials, which thereby ended his responsibility and culpability doesn't cut it...and stating, "That's not my job, man" is no defense for enabling a child rapist...

Rather than do the only proper thing, JoePa cravenly chose to remain silent...to protect the reputation of the university, his beloved football program, Jerry Sandusky...and himself...

And look what it got him...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
PipeNozzle says:
You hit the nail. For more on this PR shame, visit campusreports dot com. For more on the quality of Spanier's character, read "Malamud and Corruption at Oregon State University," a chronicle of Spanier's years as provost at OSU before he jumped to Nebraska as a stepping stone to PSU. Lucky Penn.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
167irishboy says:
The best thing his family should do is keep their mouths shut and not say or write anything about this horrible situation.

Joe knew and he didn't do anything about it, period. He did a lot of good things in his life also, but this shadow will never go away regardless of anything the family states.

We all have made mistakes that we hope others won't find out about, but covering up for a pedophile crosses the line in the sand.

If I were the family I would have remained silent.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
endrepubs says:
Poor Joe......he was raised a Catholic and learned that molesting boys was just something that happened normally in Catholic Parishes....no big deal. His priest told him it was nothing to worry about.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
weareidiots says:
Didn't the Madoff family claim the same thing? Penn State and the Paterno Family got off easy, and should be grateful. IMO, the university should have been shut down and all monies previously paid to Paterno should have been clawed back and paid to the victims.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Stephen_N says:
The Paternos commission an independent report that supports their claims concerning the scandal. Joe is innocent. The report also proves that Santa, Easter Bunny, and Tooth fariy are all real.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
thechooch1 says:
Joe knew about the abuse, supposedly reported it, then turned a blind eye to it continuing when nothing was done. Guilty as charged.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pasogal1 says:
Joe & Sue Paterno deliberately "wore blinders" so their football legacy, records, and poitions would not be tarnished. When child molestation is discovered & personnel under one is involved, a responsible and ethical coach would banish that person from the team and college. That was not done. Money and reputation trumped honesty and caring for the victims. Now, that Sue Paterno sees the public's fallout and the resulting damage to Penn State, she & the family want to 'sugarcoat" the past. That won't work. When the former head of the FBI does an investigation, the evidence he finds is credible. The Paterno family needs to accept their lack of proper response to the molestation information and the terrible repercussions it has had. The victims lives will never be the same because of Sandusky, Paterno's, & Penn State's looking the other way and ignoring the crimes.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Truth--Tracker says:
Paterno and his benefiting family hold the view that "Ignorance is bliss." They hold the view that contrived ignorance is bliss because they think it allows them to have the best of both worlds -- They can benefit from doing the wrong thing (or failing to do the right thing) while giving them the luxury of claiming ignorance and innocence when the blatantly 'obvious' ugly undergirding facts are disclosed. It's like the Alice's Restaurant line: "Yes I put that one envelope underneath the pile of illegally dumped garbage, but I did NOT dump the rest of that pile." Now I wonder why that disingenuous, self-serving claim is so "not believable?"
reply
See all 21 Comments