AP/ February 8, 2013, 7:57 PM

In letter, Sue Paterno defends late husband

In this Nov. 9, 2011 file photo, former Penn State Coach Joe Paterno and his wife, Sue Paterno, stand on their porch to thank supporters gathered outside their home in State College, Pa.

In this Nov. 9, 2011 file photo, former Penn State Coach Joe Paterno and his wife, Sue Paterno, stand on their porch to thank supporters gathered outside their home in State College, Pa. / AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File

STATE COLLEGE, Pa. Breaking more than a year of silence, Sue Paterno is defending her late husband as a "moral, disciplined" man who never twisted the truth to avoid bad publicity.

The wife of the former Penn State coach is fighting back against the accusations against Joe Paterno that followed the Jerry Sandusky scandal. Her campaign started with a letter sent Friday to former Penn State players.

She wrote that the family's exhaustive response to former FBI director Louis Freeh's report for the university on the Sandusky child sex abuse case will officially be released to the public at 9 a.m. Sunday on paterno.com.

Freeh in July accused Joe Paterno and three university officials of covering up allegations against Sandusky, a retired defensive coordinator. Less than two weeks later, the NCAA levied unprecedented sanctions on the program that Joe Paterno built into one of the most well-known in college football.

"When the Freeh report was released last July, I was as shocked as anyone by the findings and by Mr. Freeh's extraordinary attack on Joe's character and integrity. I did not recognize the man Mr. Freeh described," Sue Paterno wrote. "I am here to tell you as definitively and forcefully as I know how that Mr. Freeh could not have been more wrong in his assessment of Joe."

The family directed its attorney, Washington lawyer Wick Sollers, to assemble experts to review Freeh's findings and Joe Paterno's actions, Sue Paterno wrote.

She did not offer details on findings in the letter, "except to say that they unreservedly and forcefully confirm my beliefs about Joe's conduct.

"In addition, they present a passionate and persuasive critique of the Freeh report as a total disservice to the victims of Sandusky and the cause of preventing child sex offenses," Sue Paterno wrote.

Sue Paterno said neither Freeh's report, nor the NCAA's actions, should "close the book" on the scandal.

"This cannot happen," she wrote. "The Freeh report failed and if it is not challenged and corrected, nothing worthwhile will have come from these tragic events."

In a statement released through a spokesman, Penn State called Sue Paterno "an important and valued member of the Penn State community.

25 Photos

Joe Paterno, 1926-2012

"We have and continue to appreciate all of her work on behalf of the university," the school said. "She has touched many lives and continues to be an inspiration to many Penn Staters."

The Associated Press left messages Friday for representatives for Freeh.

Sandusky's arrest in November 2011, triggered the sweeping scandal, including the firing of Paterno and the departure under pressure of Graham Spanier as president days later. Prosecutors filed perjury and failure to report charges against former athletic director Tim Curley and retired vice president Gary Schultz.

Sandusky, 69, was sentenced last fall to at least 30 years in prison in after being convicted in June on 45 criminal counts. Prosecutors said allegations occurred on and off campus.

"The crimes committed by Jerry Sandusky are heartbreaking," Sue Paterno, who has five children and 17 grandchildren, wrote. "It is incomprehensible to me that anyone could intentionally harm a child. I think of the victims daily and I pray that God will heal their wounds and comfort their souls."

Freeh released his findings the following month. His team conducted 430 interviews and analyzed over 3.5 million emails and documents, his report said.

"Taking into account the available witness statements and evidence, it is more reasonable to conclude that, in order to avoid the consequences of bad publicity, the most powerful leaders at Penn State University — Messrs. Spanier, Schultz, Paterno and Curley — repeatedly concealed critical facts relating to Sandusky's child abuse" from authorities, trustees and the university community, Freeh wrote in releasing the report.

Less than two weeks later, Penn State hastily took down the bronze statue of Paterno outside Beaver Stadium. The next day, the NCAA said Freeh's report presented "an unprecedented failure of institutional integrity leading to a culture in which a football program was held in higher esteem."


1/2

© 2013 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
32 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SNAPJudy says:
Child sex abuse thrives in secrecy and secret systems that allow it to continue to this day,

While Sue Paterno tries to restore her husband's reputation, she is doing more harm to the victims who have been sexually abused. Her action also makes if more difficult for any child of sex abuse to even think about speaking up. And for that matter, it gives fear and hesitation to anyone, who has knowledge or suspects a child being sexually abused, to pick up the phone and call police.

Children are safest when child predators and those who enable and conceal their crimes are held responsible.
Honor the victims, not the wrongdoers... so that no other child will ever be given the life sentence of being sexually abused.

Judy Jones, SNAP Midwest Associate Director, USA, 636-433-2511. snapjudy@gmail.com, http://www.snapnetwork.org/
"SNAP (The Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests) is the world's oldest and largest support group for clergy abuse victims. SNAP was founded in 1988 and has more than 12,000 members. Despite the word priest in our title, we have members who were molested by religious figures of all denominations, including nuns, rabbis, bishops, teachers, Protestant ministers and increasingly, victims who were assaulted in a wide range of institutional settings like orphanages, summer camps, athletic programs, Boy Scouts, etc."
reply
Nellie_R replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Judy, you continue to do a disservice to victims you claim to support by posting this comment on every article you can find.

I encourage you to educate yourself further by reading Appendix B, the Jim Clemente section of the report, and then revise your public statements about the Paternos.

In hindsight, it seems they have have done more about getting the proper information out than almost anyone else.
nadiachancellor replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Finally...an excellent response to Sue Paterno's denial. Thank you, Judy! As a therapist who helps victims of sexual abuse, I find the Paterno family's fixation on excusing their father's lack of action DISTURBING. Joe Paterno himself acknowledged he wished he had done more. THIS IS AN APPROPRIATE RESPONSE! Now, Sue and family come along and basically spit in the victims' faces all over again by talking about how great Joe was. I have never doubted his character or the likelihood of him being a nice person, especially when he acknowledged his own failing with Sandusky. The truth is that as adults, we all share a responsibility in protecting children. It came to his attention that children may be in danger and he dropped the ball. I pray people like Sue would wake up.
She has an opportunity to validate the victims by acknowledging how they were failed as her husband did. Instead, she says, "I pray for you and I hope you get help." Disgusting.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
baileycccc says:
As far as I am concern, Paterno is just as guilty as Sandusky for covering it up.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
robert1129 says:
Thus far, the only thing we have learned from her is that she is a loyal supportive wife. Unless Sunday provs different that is all she is.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mark648 says:
A pathetic attempt at defending the indefensible.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mtowlesr says:
Read the letter in whole. Then go read some of her quotes from when this began or watch a video. She did not write that letter, some lawyer did. This is basically a position paper for the family.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pmici55 says:
Good for Sue. What happened is a tragedy. Sandusky is guilty. Perhaps others were complicit (the administration and maybe parents who turned a blind eye). Certainly the coach who 'witnessed' one of the attacks. But to single out Paterno is a huge injustice. And the NCAA overstepped its bounds because it smelled blood and saw a cash cow dropped in front of them. No matter how much time it takes, or how much money, I support the idea of these young men getting a settlement. As long as it all goes to therapy and not to a sports car.
reply
mrleet60 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Simply put, Paterno was the head of the program. He is responsible for the actions of those he supervises. Whether he believed the allegations, or not, he KNEW Sandusky's behavior was suspect - and action should have been taken. His actions or lack there of, made him complicit.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cptdeuce says:
Joe Paterno is burning in Hell for his complicity in this terrible, terrible autrocity. Shame on all you defending him.
reply
mrleme replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Wouldn't you rather have the truth? Not depend on one source for the obvious knee jerk reaction of Penn State and the NCAA which was obvious to everyone. Who are you to wish someone to Hell? Do you know what Hell is and have you been there? I doubt you even believe in Heaven & Hell.
preacherbob1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You seem to be theologically confused. You have Paterno "burning in Hell", and you like the rest of us, really don't know all the facts. They may come to light shortly. In the meantime, your assumption of the role as judge as well as executioner seems a bit off base.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
petesis says:
Big name, big responsibilities, big reputation.... Coach Paterno clearly did not do enough in this terrible situation. Maybe it was denial. Whatever it was, I think he himself would have done things very differently the second time around. He failed in this area. There is no getting around it. He was a great coach and in many ways a great man, but in this particular horrific instance, he came up way way short.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
peacefulperson says:
Of course she defends her husband. What is she going to say, "My husband knew sex abuse was going on and did nothing and I'm really proud of the way he handled that"?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tmonta67 says:
Joe himself said he "wished he had done more" to protect those boys. He did't say "I wish I had known." This implies a cover-up, although we'll never know exactly what's behind those words.

Personally, I see him as highly succesful yet fallible human who dropped the ball on a big play, and got called on a penalty. It stays on the record along with his positive stats.
reply
aChangeOfIdeas replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
And if you read his autobiography, published long before the Sandusky issues ever started (that we know of) you'll read the same exact words "I wish I could have done more" written by Paterno about his players when they had gotten into trouble doing things that he had no knowledge or control over (like going to a party late at night before a game or wrecking a car. He somehow thought he could have prevented those things. Could he? That man wanted the best for EVERYONE. Do you know anything about him? He loved everyone and saw the best in everyone. It's no surprise that he saw the good side in Sandusky, he saw the good side in everyone.
thechooch1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
aChangeOfIdeas there is no defending the indefensible. Did he see the "good side" of the raped boys?
See all 32 Comments