AP/ February 7, 2013, 10:42 AM

Pa. mistrial declared when man's prosthetic eye pops out on witness stand

PHILADELPHIA An assault trial over a fight that cost a man his left eye ended in a mistrial Wednesday when his prosthetic eye popped out as he was testifying, startling jurors.

John Huttick was weeping on the witness stand as he testified about the impact of losing his eye in the August 2011 fight in the parking lot of a bar called the New Princeton Tavern, The Philadelphia Inquirer reported.

Suddenly, the $3,000 prosthetic blue eye popped out. Huttick caught it and cried out as two jurors gasped and started to rise.

"I couldn't believe it just came out," Huttick said.

Judge Robert Coleman, who called it an "unfortunate, unforeseen incident," granted a mistrial motion by defense attorney Eileen Hurley. He scheduled a new trial for March 4.

A group of people including Huttick and defendant Matthew Brunelli had been drinking at the bar, Assistant District Attorney Mark Gilson said. Brunelli left with a girlfriend but got into an argument with another patron that turned into a fight in the parking lot, and when Huttick tried to separate the pair Brunelli threw a punch that hit Huttick's left eye, Gilson said.

Hurley said her client, who's charged with aggravated assault, struck Huttick with a fist, but Gilson said he "stabbed" Huttick with a metal key sticking out between his fingers.

Huttick, who's suing Brunelli, said that he lost his job because of the injury and that depression drained his finances and nearly broke up his relationship with his girlfriend.

"A year later," Huttick said, "I have no place to live, and I ran out of money."

© 2013 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
7 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ENDER7727 says:
I dont see why they declared it a mistrial though. He obviously made it come out for more attention. Something that will probably happen in the next trial as well.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tsigili says:
Why a mistrial?

The jury presumably new, the ma had a prosthetic eye, so where's the issue????

More miscarriage of justice, by the judiciary.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tempestbourne says:
Keep an eye out for the new trial.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
HobartSchmenge says:
Everyone in the courtroom was an eye witness.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Montana5 says:
Everyone in favor of a conviction, say eye.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jeffinpa1234 says:
I would nominate him for an Oscar!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
imnho says:
It appears that the jury got an eyefull
reply
Scroll Left Scroll Right