AP/ February 1, 2013, 9:34 PM

4 arrested for defying San Francisco's nudity ban

San Francisco police make arrests for being naked in public Friday, Feb. 1, 2013, in front of City Hall in San Francisco.

San Francisco police make arrests for being naked in public Friday, Feb. 1, 2013, in front of City Hall in San Francisco. / AP Photo/Ben Margot

SAN FRANCISCO Four protesters were arrested entirely in the buff as they took to the steps of San Francisco City Hall in a brazen challenge of the city's ban on public nudity on Friday, the first day it went into effect.

One woman and three men — one wearing just a mesh thong — were taken into custody as about a dozen other protesters in various states of undress paraded around with painted slogans on their bodies, holding up signs with messages such as "The Human Body is Beautiful."

Police gave them a 15-minute warning to disperse or put pants on before officers arrested those who failed to cover themselves. The protesters said their arrest would advance the cause of "body freedom."

"No matter what, we're going to continue practicing body freedom," said Gypsy Taub, a mother of two who hosts a local cable program devoted to the nudist cause. "In a society that's repressed and crazy, that glorifies war and at the same time criminalizes the human body ... nudity is a political statement."

In December, the Board of Supervisors voted 7-4 in favor of the ordinance, which prohibits exposed genitals in most public places, including streets, sidewalks and public transit. A federal judge ruled Tuesday that nudity was not protected free speech and upheld San Francisco's ban on most displays of public nudity.

Protesters vowed to appeal the judge's decision.

Police spokesman Albie Esparza said the arrests were simply an attempt to enforce compliance with the law, which the city enacted after residents complained about people in various stages of undress.

"We're not here to arrest and cite people if we don't have to, but if we have to, we will enforce the law," he said. "We want to admonish as many people as possible and try to gain compliance."

Activists challenging the measure also had argued that the ordinance was unfair because it grants exceptions for nudity at permitted public events such as the city's gay pride parade. They complained that forcing people to cover up would undermine San Francisco's reputation as a city without inhibitions.

© 2013 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
21 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
PourpaixPourpaix says:
OK, I get it. Nude is not lewd. But since I don't frequent strip bars or porn sites, pretty much any nudity I see is rather disgusting and unwelcome. Please ladies and gentlemen, please keep your tents on?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Razmataz63 says:
nude is not lewd, but it's certainly inappropriate under these circumstances.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jeffkro says:
I think the problem with San Francisco's pulbic nudity is that it was primarily old gay men. If they could have included a higher percentage of hot 20 something women it would have gone over great. :)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AllConsiderations says:
I used to dream about visiting San Francisco, seeing museums, eating giod food. No longer. I will choose another destination where the locals are not so invasive and selfish.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
crankyoleman says:
My eyes! My eyes!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
judymar14 says:
Not much is left to the imagination with the itty-bitty bikini and 'trunks' worn now. Though some women/men would look better without bikini/trunks, no fat squeezed out over the bottoms and boobs falling out the top, let it all hand down.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
usaoutsider says:
Nudity should be made compulsory throughout the USA.

It would make it obvious who is carrying guns and therefore reduce gun crime.
reply
jeffkro replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Uh, huh. Obviously haven't spent much time in Montana or North Dakota.
qc-canada replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Good point!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
phydeux2 says:
The problem here is ACTIVISTS. There's one for every cause, and they feel they have the moral right to inflict their views on the rest of us. Personally, I don't want to see other people's junk and flab. And I don't particularly enjoy the idea of their fecal bacteria being left on public seats. So go be naked in your home activists... and let the rest of society live a more modest and clean life in public.
reply
jeffkro replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I don't want to see fat people who don't take care of themselves. I still think they have the right to be out in public though. :)
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Goldwater64s6 says:
What would Jesus do?
reply
realtimecoffee replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Let people rot in their own fleshbags. That is what Jesus did. That and hang out with ****** and tax collectors. "The poor we will always have with us..."
linkicon reporticon emailicon
democracy8 says:
If you want to be nude in your own home or in designated areas such as nude beaches, fine. The rest of us don't need to see your junk.
reply
Jonseen replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Exactly.
See all 21 Comments