
A sign welcomes Sandy Hook Elementary schoolchildren on their first day of classes near the former Chalk School in Monroe, Conn., Jan. 3, 2013. / AP Photo
HARTFORD, Conn. A legislative working group reviewing school security after the deadly Newtown shooting is being urged not to turn Connecticut's schools into armed fortresses.
Stefan Pryor, the state's education commissioner, told the panel on Friday that a school environment needs to be warm and inviting, as well as safe and secure. He said there are security changes that can be made invisibly in schools, such as more video surveillance.
Friday's public hearing marked the first of four hearings behind held by a legislative task force on gun violence and children's safety.
Lawmakers were also urged to consider funding more uniformed, armed school resource officers in Connecticut schools. An association of school principals said it favors having those trained police officers rather than armed guards or arming teachers and principals.
So the moral of the story is the future mass shooter goes somewhere else, and not the defended school.
The suggestion from the NRA is to have "A GUARD."....ONE....JUST ONE.
Talk about the Left first, taking the suggestion WAY out of context...and second, ignoring an IMMEDIATE STEP THAT WOULD DIRECTLY INCRESE SECURITY.
Banning assault rifles MAY stop a future attack, but puting armed security in schools WILL PREVENT/STOP FUTURE INCIDENTS.
An assault weapons ban that leaves hundreds of thousands of assault weapons in the hands of their present owners is no real solution. It is pretending to address the problem without effectively doing so. The same for high capacity magazines. If you are going to do it right, the possession of assaut weapons, high capacity ammunition magazines and armor piercing ammunition by civillians should be outlawed...just like possession of hand grenades or automatic weapons.