CBS/AP/ January 22, 2013, 10:47 AM

Roe v. Wade 40 years later: Abortion foes push for more limits

Abortion opponents rally at the steps of the Kansas Statehouse in Topeka, Kan., Jan. 22, 2013.

Abortion opponents rally at the steps of the Kansas Statehouse in Topeka, Kan., Jan. 22, 2013. / AP Photo

Updated 4:19 p.m. ET

TOPEKA, Kan. Abortion opponents marked the 40th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision Tuesday with workshops, prayers and calls for more limits on the rights established by the Supreme Court in the landmark ruling that still defines one of the nation's most intractable debates.

Many in the anti-abortion movement looked to Kansas, where Republican Gov. Sam Brownback signed a series of tough anti-abortion measures during his first two years in office. Other states with GOP governors and Republican-controlled legislatures have taken similar steps.

"There's joy in what you're doing and keep it up," Brownback urged hundreds of fellow abortion opponents at a rally outside the Kansas Statehouse. "Keep marching. Keep moving."

Abortion-rights groups observed a quieter anniversary — a possible reflection of the reality that it's far rarer for lawmakers to expand access to abortion. The National Organization for Women planned a candlelight vigil at the Supreme Court to commemorate the 1973 decision, which created a constitutional right to abortions in some circumstances and prevented states from banning the practice.

The ruling "should be honored," said Rep. Emily Perry, a lawyer and Democrat from the Kansas City suburb of Mission who supports abortion rights. "I wish the amount of energy put into narrowing Roe v. Wade would be put into school funding or our budget."

In Topeka, at least 1,000 people rallied with Brownback and anti-abortion legislators. The Kansas governor has called on state lawmakers to create "a culture of life." He is expected to support whatever further restrictions they approve.

Kansans for Life, the most influential of the state's anti-abortion groups, plans to ask lawmakers to enact legislation ensuring that the state doesn't finance abortions even indirectly, such as through tax breaks or by allowing doctors-in-training at the University of Kansas Medical Center in Kansas City, Kan., to perform them on the center's time.

The group also wants to strengthen a state law dictating what information must be provided to abortion patients, banning abortions because of the fetus' gender and allowing wrongful-death lawsuits when a fetus dies because of an accident.

Comparable proposals are gaining ground elsewhere, too. Republican lawmakers in North Dakota are pursuing a measure to ban "sex selection" abortions. Alabama's GOP legislative majorities are looking to impose new health and safety regulations for abortion providers. And Republicans in Arkansas want to ban abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy.

"I think more of America is becoming more pro-life," said Dr. Melissa Colbern, who started a crisis pregnancy center in Topeka near the state Capitol last year. "I think maybe the culture is changing."

A new poll found that 54 percent of adults said abortion should be legal at least most of the time. At the same time, 44 percent of respondents wanted abortion to be illegal, with some favoring certain exemptions. The poll, conducted by NBC News and The Wall Street Journal, was released Monday.

Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro Choice America, said most citizens are not demanding their elected officials push for new abortion restrictions.

"A lot of these anti-choice politicians don't run on the issue," Keenan said in an interview Tuesday with The Associated Press. "They run on jobs, or they run on the economy. And then they show up in these state legislatures, and they begin to advance very anti-choice legislation."

In the four decades since Roe v. Wade, a series of court decisions have narrowed its scope. With each decision, lawmakers in multiple states have followed up by making abortions more difficult to obtain or imposing restrictions on providers.

According to the New York-based Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive-rights think tank, 135 laws aimed in some way at restricting access to abortion were enacted in 30 states — most of them with Republican-controlled legislatures — in 2011 and 2012. More such measures already have been proposed in several states this year.

In Wyoming, for example, a pending bill would prohibit abortions after a fetal heartbeat is audible. A similar "heartbeat" bill is pending in Mississippi, and one was debated but later sidetracked in Ohio last year.

In Texas, Republican Gov. Rick Perry has told lawmakers that he expects to make progress during the 2013 session toward his goal of making abortion "at any stage a thing of the past." Anti-abortion activists have pledged to use every legal means possible to make obtaining abortions difficult, if not impossible.

But Kansans for Life eschews proposals designed to set up a head-on legal challenge to the Roe v. Wade decision, fearing the Supreme Court might wipe out some of the gains achieved by abortion opponents in recent years.

"We'd like to continue on our successful strategy," Kathy Ostrowski, the group's legislative director, said during a pre-rally news conference. "We feel that we're making better strides that way."

Tuesday's events won't be the only anniversary observances. The annual March for Life, which traditionally draws several hundred thousand abortion opponents to Washington, is scheduled for Friday.

Although bills to strengthen access to abortion are rare, there are some pending proposals in New York and Washington state.

In their state of the state speeches this month, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo endorsed a bill that would further entrench the right to abortion, while Washington's new governor, Jay Inslee, said he wants to enact a measure that would require insurers who cover maternity care — which Washington insurers are mandated to provide — to also pay for abortions.

Both Cuomo and Inslee are Democrats.

"Forty years ago, the United States stood as an example to the rest of the world in recognizing a woman's right to a safe and legal abortion as a constitutionally protected right," said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights. "But the women in this country shouldn't have to rely on the courts to right the wrongs of their elected officials."

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
94 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
h_al11 says:
Maybe Americans will finally wake up and turn pro-life. With all of the technology and knowledge we have today, it's obvious that Roe v Wade was a mistake. Turning a blind eye and pretending it is just a matter of choice is a cop out. And leaving the abortion decision to people under severe emotional distress is the wrong answer. Legislators make policy, and state legislators should be permitted to protect the unborn in their states.

Abortion is savage.
reply
JV1970 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I totally agree!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
HM8432 says:
Although I'm divided on the abortion issue, here's a question somebody in Washington needs to ask: Since millions have been aborted legally since 1973, how much in potential tax revenue and Social Security (and other social program) contributions have been lost since Roe Vs. Wade was passed?

Looking at abortion from a purely economic viewpoint, we're killing off our tax and entitlement revenue base, and that's bad news for the Baby Boomers, since the succeeding generations are much smaller than their population group.
reply
MRPAULGE0RGE replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Interesting point. What is the total economic loss due to fewer younger people working and paying into the SS trust fund along with general tax revenues?
tmittelstaed replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Your assuming all aborted fetuses would have resulted in a viable baby. That isn't true. Many abortions are done to save the life of the mother and the fetus isn't viable. Many others are done by prostitutes and those on drugs where if the fetus survived to term it would have been brain damaged or otherwise been under taxpayer funded care. And even some abortions are done by teenagers who accidentally get pregnant - and forcing them to carry the baby to term ruins their college plans or future work ability or ability to get a usable education - so you end up destroying the mothers life - creating a welfare case that sucks off the taxpayers for the rest of her life.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Mike_Haas says:
All of this discussion just points out why this is a political issue that should be debated and determined as we determine other public policy questions. Instead, 7 old, white men on the Supreme Court pulled a new Constitutional right out of the air and declared the debate over. Worse yet, they clearly didn't believe in the new right they created, or the right to control ones body would hvae been extended to drug use or other entirely individual choices. So we've killed 60 Million people. I hope we're proud of ourselves.
reply
JV1970 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
This is an issue that should be put on the next presidential election ballots. The people should be allowed to vote on it once and for all. The will of the voters should be done about this and not the will of the Supreme Court.
displeased2 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I haven't killed anybody, and you don't have to either.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lindag20 says:
Also I wonder how much you'll enjoy it when one day you find yourself old, sick and alone with no husband and no children?
------------------
Isn't that where you are RIGHT now JV??? LOL
reply
JV1970 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
It was not my choice to not have children! I'm childless by circumstances not choice.

I'm old fashioned. I believe a child should have both a mother and a father and I don't believe in having sex before marriage.

Second, about twenty-five years ago I began having physical problems that eventually led to a full hysterectomy that ended my ability to have children.
Lindag20 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Since you're in this position, why do you find it necessary to taunt ANOTHER woman? Just curious.
See all 9 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lindag20 says:
JV1970 replies: MojitoMamma I will go to my grave resisting people like you and speaking out against Roe v Wade!
---------------------
JV it's EXTEMELY easy to sit in your apartment and tell others what to do. If you're so against Roe v Wade, why don't you have your sentiments inscrobed on your tombstone?
reply
JV1970 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I would but there are much better things that I'd rather have inscribed there!
Lindag20 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You could always put "Here lies JV, old and barren but never stopped declarin' I'm better than the heathen. RIP"
See all 4 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MRPAULGE0RGE says:
All this talk about choice - what about the choice of keeping your pants on and legs closed?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nottblu says:
55 million human beings slaughtered since ROE V WADE, one in three women have had an abortion, the left fully supports the genocide of these children yet scream for and justify gun control to keep children safe, love the double standard, love the hipocrisy.
reply
Lindag20 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
While you advocate that more guns will make everyone safer, despite the many killings by those who become angry and shoot family members like that teenager in New Mexico.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
JV1970 says:
I pray everyday that I'll live long enough to one day see Roe v Wade overturned!
reply
VO142857 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I pray for you to live forever.
Lindag20 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The rapture will come first JV.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
h_al11 says:
abortion is to choice, as evolution is to science

The progressive's ideas are designed to insulate the individual from accountability, duty, and even consequences. What else could we have expected from the 60s??
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Type_Z says:
Liberals are fooling only themselves for all the names they have for the unborn. Forget religion. If liberals can not admit it is biologically a young life, they must also believe the earth is flat.

Denial may work for you, but it is a poor excuse for taking a life. If it is not life, then why not just leave it alone and tell it to go away. It is phenomenally naive to not recognize life begins small, grows in the womb and for years and years after birth.

Do you not understand why the young life needs its mother? Do you not understand the role of the placenta and umbilical cord? It's not there for amusement, it nourishes the unborn, delivers oxygenated blood and exchanges waste. At birth the baby takes its first breath and oxygenates its own body for the first time. The umbilical cord is cut, it is no longer needed.

Do you know the Mother can feel the light brush or flutter of the baby at 16 to 20 weeks. It is like a butterfly kiss and a beautiful thing.

It is life before birth, and life after birth, when we are so lucky that everything goes as it should. The unborn can hear, feel and sense the Mothers' temperament. All of you should take accountability if you do not desire to have a child.

I'm not telling anyone what to do with their lives, just be real about what it is. Don't have regrets or a woman that will have to live with what she did.

It's your choice.
reply
Type_Z replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
No, I will leave that up to liberals that choose to take the life of the innocent. Again, abortion would not my personal choice but liberals pride themselves on being so "enlightened".

So go stay enlightened and delight in yourselves.
Type_Z replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I'm sure liberals conform when Letterman, or Longoria, or Obama himself decides children should live. You will conform when your party decides its "cool" and tells you to.

Just remember we were light years ahead of you.
See all 94 Comments