CBS/AP/ January 15, 2013, 4:34 PM

New York passes first U.S. gun control bill since Newtown massacre

Updated 6:41 p.m. ET

ALBANY, N.Y. New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo on Tuesday signed the toughest gun control law in the nation and the first since the Newtown, Conn., school shooting, calling for a tougher assault weapons ban and provisions to try to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill who make threats.

Cuomo pushed hard for the bill, which passed the Senate on Monday night and easily passed the Assembly earlier Tuesday.

"I'm proud to be a New Yorker," Cuomo said. "It's not just the first bill, it's the best bill."

On Monday night, after the Senate passed the measure, Cuomo likened gun control to a public health issue.

"This is a scourge on society," Cuomo said Monday night, six days after making gun control a centerpiece of his State of the State address. The bipartisan effort was fueled by the Newtown tragedy that took the lives of 20 first graders and six educators. "At what point do you say, `No more innocent loss of life'?"

The measure, which passed the Assembly 104-43, also calls for restrictions on ammunition and the sale of guns.

"This is not about taking anyone's rights away," said Sen. Jeffrey Klein, a Bronx Democrat, when the bill passed the Senate late Monday night. "It's about a safe society ... today we are setting the mark for the rest of the county to do what's right."

Under current state law, assault weapons are defined by having two "military rifle" features such as folding stock, muzzle flash suppressor or bayonet mount. The proposal reduces that to one feature and includes the popular pistol grip.

Under the new law, people who already own assault weapons that are now banned will be allowed to keep them, but will have to register the guns with the police, CBS News correspondent Chip Reid reports.

That's one reason Republican State Senator Greg Ball voted no.

"What we did do is create an entire new category of illegal firearms out of firearms that are legal currently and thereby turning law abiding gun owners into criminals in this state," Ball said.

The National Rifle Association weighed in late Tuesday on the new New York law, saying it is outraged by it. The NRA said the law will have no impact on safety.

Play Video

Obama speaks out on gun control, debt ceiling

Meanwhile President Barack Obama will formally announce a "package of concrete proposals" for reducing gun violence on Wednesday, the White House announced.

In a White House press briefing Tuesday, spokesman Jay Carney declined to outline exactly what Mr. Obama's plan would entail, but noted that it would reflect the president's desire for a "comprehensive approach," as well as specific legislative actions he has called on before -- including reinstating the assault weapons ban, a ban on high-capacity magazine clips, and expanded background checks for gun owners.

Private sales of assault weapons to someone other than an immediate family will be subject to a background check through a dealer. New Yorkers also would be barred from buying assault weapons over the Internet, and failing to safely store a weapon could lead to a misdemeanor charge.

Ammunition magazines will be restricted to seven bullets, from the current 10, and current owners of higher-capacity magazines will have a year to sell them out of state. An owner caught at home with eight or more bullets in a magazine will face a misdemeanor charge.

Another provision places requirements on therapists, psychologists, registered nurses and licensed social workers who believe a mental health patient made a credible threat to use a gun illegally. They would be required to report such a threat to a mental health director, who would have to notify the state. Any registered handguns — or registered assault weapons purchased before the ban — could be taken from the patient.

CBS News correspondent Reid reports this provision has caused concern for some experts.

Dr. Paul Applebaum, a professor of psychiatry at Columbia University, said: "I think there's a very realistic probability that patients will simply avoid seeking treatment, or if they come to treatment will sit there without disclosing what's truly on their mind for fear that if they do the state will know about it and consequences will follow."

The legislation also increases sentences for gun crimes including the shooting of a first responder that Cuomo called the "Webster provision." Last month in the western New York town of Webster, two firefighters were killed after responding to a fire set by the shooter, who eventually killed himself.

The measure passed the Senate 43-18 on the strength of support from Democrats, many of whom previously sponsored bills that were once blocked by Republicans.

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, one of the nation's leading gun control advocates, said the bill will not satisfy everyone but said it is a move in the right direction.

"New York has been a leader. We have some of the toughest gun laws in the country and this just strengthens them, it fills in loopholes and it expands it as the society's needs have changed and the dangers have changed to all of us," Bloomberg told reporters including WCBS 880's Marla Diamond. "It makes all New Yorkers safer and they all - from the governor down - deserve real credit for doing it."

The governor confirmed the proposal, previously worked out in closed session, also mandate a police registry of assault weapons, grandfathering in the estimated 1 million assault weapons already in private hands.

It was agreed upon exactly a month since the Sandy Hook Elementary School tragedy.

"It is well-balanced, it protects the Second Amendment," said Senate Republican leader Dean Skelos of Long Island.

Cuomo said he wanted quick action to avoid a run on assault weapons and ammunition.

Assemblyman Steve Katz said legislators were being "bullied." He said the bill is "solely for the governor's egotistical, misguided notion."

Republicans argued the bill wouldn't stop mass shootings or other gun crimes but instead turns law-abiding into potential criminals.

Republican Assemblyman James Tedisco said the bill was dangerous because it would give people a "false sense of well-being."

"You are using innocent children killed by a mad man for own political agenda," he said. "You are actually making people less safe."

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
94 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
purplepixiepunk says:
the guns are not the problem the people handling them are even i know this and I am only 13.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
JayChong56 says:
Guns serve to give people a sense of power and thus a part of the bill of rights, but the limit on liberty is when it harms others. The question, however, is personal responsibility. Its a shame that legal gun owners are punished for the actions of a few.

http://lawblog.legalmatch.com/2013/01/25/requiring-therapists-report-violent-patients-safer/
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Localexpert123 says:
All the politicians did was assault the tax paying loyal gun owner because we are easy targets...meanwhile gang bangers in Obama's hometown of Chicago get to celebrate 500 murders. I love my AK47, its a tactical defense weapon, and I like firing it at the range because of its performance. Whether YOU or anyone else thinks I don't need it can shove it sideways. My country, my choice....you want to take that away? you move away and let us protect our rights, the constitution and our liberties. Remember this, by allowing Cuomo and Obama take our rights away is allowing them to do whatever they feel with our bill of rights. What good is a right when that right can be taken away? it should be renamed a bill of privileges,no?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
laughingatlibs says:
Adolph Cuomo and the other New York lefties were in such a hurry to take rights away from their citizens they forgot to include an exemption for law enforcement. I haven't heard anything this fun ny in years.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Track9 says:
Bravo New York ! Nice to know that your representatives acknowledge the concerns of the citizens to value life and safety. Lead the way!
reply
Localexpert123 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Bravo NY?? For what? All you delusional people including the idiotic politicians did was assault the loyal tax paying citizen. You have done NOTHING....period. Meanwhile there were 500 murders in cities like Chicago by gangsters who couldn't care about gun laws. So what does this do for a tax payer like me? less ammunition, less bullets in my clip? Gee...that will teach me.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dutch-mill-68 says:
This is wonderful news. Now, all of you who think you will be safer and love these laws, move to New York! There should be mass exodus by libs now from Detroit and Chicago to NY!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FormerUSMCSergeant says:
TimeToRetire replies: BTW, that car of yours can go over 100 MPH.
---
No it can't. Electronic governor by design limits it to 100 MPH. I don't NEED to go even that fast.....
reply
TimeToRetire replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
So sell it. You don't need it. By it being able to go 100, you are threatening the lives of our children.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ulgnud says:
Using the hysteria of the shooting they passed yet more gun control, interfering with the lawful citizens rights. The act was in a gun free zone committed with stolen weapons, by someone who was mentally unqualified to have them. Proof positive that the gun control laws did not work. You contemptible liberals rode this in on the backs of mindless sheep. No surprise the violence rate is so high in NY. Those who give up liberty for the illusion of security deserve neither, and will lose both. (Quote as best as I remember from Benjamin Franklin).
reply
FormerUSMCSergeant replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
OK.
How about you give us ONE good reason why the average citizen needs assault weapons or why weapons should be sold to the mentally ill?
Otherwise, shove it sideways.
TimeToRetire replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Former,

Reason not needed in this country. If some something and he can afford, that is enough reason. If you believe people should be allowed to only have things they NEED, you should try a communist country. Their governments take everything and give you only what they think you need. BTW, that car of yours can go over 100 MPH. Give me a reason why you need that. Otherwise, trade it in for a 50-pound Smart Car.
See all 6 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FormerUSMCSergeant says:
Nobodyhasthisname says:This will end the political careers of many Dumocrats. Wait till we take over and throw all of you out.
---
You're going to have to win some elections first.....
reply
legalbutunjust replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Damn right, it's not like these hardline right-wingers can blaze their way into office and into power with a hail of bullets.
FormerUSMCSergeant replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
And considering that you think you can win elections without women, Blacks, Gays, Hispanics, and Muslims, that won't be any time soon......
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FormerUSMCSergeant says:
"..calling for a tougher assault weapons ban and provisions to try to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill who make threats."
----
Anyone who argues against this is certifiably insane in my book.
reply
See all 94 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right