Texas officer suspended indefinitely for cursing outburst caught on tape

This screenshot taken from a cell phone video by 17-year-old Jordan Rojas shows Officer Disraeli Arnold. / CBS/DFW
A police officer from Hurst, Texas, is suspended indefinitely for violating department rules with a profanity-laced outburst caught on tape, CBS DFW reports.
An investigation included that the officer, Disraeli Arnold, was extremely unprofessional when repeatedly cursing out a 17-year-old being arrested for an outstanding warrant. The video, taken by a friend of the arrested teen's, can be seen here.
Arnold "was disrespectful to a citizen, used indecent, profane and harsh language in the performance of his duties, and conducted himself in a manner which brought discredit to himself and the Hurst Police Department," according to a release by the City of Hurst.
The Hurst Police Department, however, said Arnold used a reasonable amount of force "based upon his perception when he arrived to assist Officer Jimenez."
Assistant Police Chief Steve Niekamp told CBS DFW that the suspension is the equivalent of a termination from the department.
According to Police Chief Steve Moore, Officer Miguel Jimenez told the teen suspect, Andrew Rodriguez, he was going to jail when Rodriguez began to walk away and call his mother. Jimenez then called for back-up for resisting arrest.
The teen's friend, 17-year-old Jordan Rojas, took video on his cell phone of Officer Arnold running to the teenager and tackling him while he was already on the ground. The video shows Arnold repeatedly cursing at the teen and asking him at least three times if he wanted to die.
Rodriguez's mother, Kelly Pope, told CBS's Dallas Fort-Worth affiliate the warrant was from a ticket her son received four years ago for trespassing on school property after hours.
CBS DFW reports that Arnold has received mostly positive reviews for his work, referred to by superiors as a "team player" interested in being promoted to supervisor. Some reviews, however, had mentioned that the officer could get "overzealous" and lose sight of the "big picture."
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Firsthand look at MTA mega-digs 11 Photos
- Disruptive man on United jet taken off flight
- Feds digging in Mich. field for Jimmy Hoffa's remains
- 94-year-old Minn. man linked to Nazi atrocities
- Church shooting in Ogden, Utah not a random act of violence Play Video
- Former hitman testifies at "Whitey" Bulger trial
- 5 teens killed in fiery Orange County car crash
- Day care worker accused of drugging snacks for nap-time














Believe me there are those not commenting that view this as no big deal because it isn't . So Mom would you rather a cop intimidate your beloved kid with harsh words , and not have to resort to physical force ?
It is all about making someone to comply with instructions , I don't know about you but I would rather meet a cop with a strong intimidation ability of speech rather than a cop with either a heavy hand for a taser or physical restraint .
Well I think we can both agree that will be confronted by his Boss. But other than the ability of cops able to turn it off as quick as they can turn it on , the risk everyone is seeing here as you have pointed to , where could have this escalated to .
That is why overwhelming measures are taken sometimes , so that the nobody gets hurt . I am not a cop but I totally understand that there was one cop and two or more others , so perhaps the over zealous approach of the cop , should be viewed , that the cop was securing the situation with such speech to repel others from fleeing and so forth . I am not defending the cop , however I am defending the outcome of control at the cost of harsh speech , with no one hurt . Do you know what others had on their person as the cop secured one that had distanced himself from the first point of contact , as the "cop did run" after the kid , with others at his back ? The cop was speaking aloud to all , and that intimitation secured and controlled the situation .
Just a point of view , like you also have a point of view .
Of course, if he had actually effin killed someone without justification it would be an internal matter, bolstered by the blue wall, an ensuing investigation would have cleared him, and he'd be back in the saddle in 90 days. Conclusion: it's okay to kill someone without justification but don't be "disrespectful to a citizen" while you're doing it.
Not that I'd have any better judgement skills; police face some off-the-wall people out there, with and without video cell phones.
If every cop was to be confronted for threats and profane speech , every country would be without cops .