Kansas trying to make sperm donor pay child support
TOPEKA, Kan. A sperm donor in Kansas is fighting a state effort to force him to pay child support for a child conceived through artificial insemination by a lesbian couple.
William Marotta, 46, of Topeka said he is "a little scared about where this is going to go, primarily for financial reasons," The Topeka Capital-Journal reported Monday.
When he donated sperm to Angela Bauer and Jennifer Schreiner in 2009, Marotta relinquished all parental rights, including financial responsibility to the child. When Bauer and Schreiner filed for state assistance this year, the state demanded the donor's name so it could collect child support for the now 3-year-old girl. Bauer and Schreiner broke up in 2010 but co-parent their eight children, who range in age from 3 months to 25 years.
"In the long run, I think this will be a good thing, but I'm the one getting squashed," Marotta said. "I can't even believe it's gone this far at this point, and there's not a damn thing I can do about it."
Though his attorneys, Benoit Swinnen and Hannah Schroller, are charging him reduced rates, Marotta said he expects the legal fees to eventually be more than he can afford. He is predominantly a mechanic but said he is currently working in a different field. He and his wife, Kimberly, have no biological children but care for foster children.
"I've already paid more than 10 percent of my yearly salary, and I don't know many folks who are willing to give up more than 10 percent of their yearly income," he said.
The state contends the agreement between Marotta and the women is not valid because Kansas law requires a licensed physician to perform artificial insemination.
"Speaking generally, all individuals who apply for taxpayer-funded benefits through DCF are asked to cooperate with child support enforcement efforts," Angela de Rocha, a spokeswoman for the Kansas Department for Children and Families, said in a statement. "If a sperm donor makes his contribution through a licensed physician and a child is conceived, the donor is held harmless under state statue. In cases where the parties do not go through a physician or a clinic, there remains the question of who actually is the father of a child or children.
"DCF is required by statute to establish paternity and then pursue child support from the non-custodial parent," she wrote.
A hearing on a motion by Marotta's attorneys to dismiss the case is scheduled for Jan. 8 in Shawnee County District Court.
Bauer and Schreiner have said they fully support Marotta's efforts to fight the state's request. When Bauer was diagnosed in March with what she calls "a significant illness" that prevents her from working, Schreiner sought health insurance for their daughter from the state. The DCF told Schreiner if she didn't provide the sperm donor's name, it would deny any health benefits because she was withholding information.
Marotta said Monday he doesn't resent Schreiner for giving the state his name.
"I resent the fact that Jennifer was pressured into doing that in the first place," he said. "That was wrong — wrong by the state."
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Powerball frenzy locks down most possible number combos
- 1 winning ticket sold in Fla. on Powerball
- Crash in small Va. town injures dozens during parade
- Authorities: N.Y. college student was killed by police 44 Comments
- Seven-time lottery winner shares secret to winning Powerball
- Texas tornado survivors start to return home
- The War in Chicago
- Official: Broken rail eyed in Conn. train crash
The States - all 50 - couldn't care less about the interest of the child; its States' fervent pursuit of yearly and massive, Federal Subsidies that drives their Gestapo like tactics in matters involving child support collection....
Consider, in California alone, we have over 8,000 men paying child support for children that DNA evidence has proven they didn't father; why? Quota! If the Golden State were to emancipate these men from their assigned debt, the State risks losing the $90+ million Federal Dollars it receives annually for its child support collection and case management efforts; funds that never make their way into the lives of children of divorce or impoverished kids! Instead, those Federal Funds finance the salaries, benefits packages, paid vacation time, and pensions of tens-of-thousands of people employed by or retired from the Child Support Collection and Family Law regimes.
To understand what a tremendous taxpayer rip-off this is, one should also know that the only definitive, Federally Funded study ever conducted on child support showed that when employed, men pay between 83 and 91% of all court ordered child support and that they do so without intervention of any kind. But, when those figures became apparent Wayne Stanton, then head of the National Child Support Enforcement Department in D.C had the study discontinued! In fact, Stanton's office demanded a formal Freedom of Information Act Submission merely to retrieve the study's data.