CBS/AP/ November 15, 2012, 11:31 AM

Leon Panetta orders military ethics review in wake of David Petraeus sex scandal

BANGKOK Citing a string of ethical lapses by senior military officers, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has asked the Joint Chiefs of Staff to review ethics training and to brainstorm on ways to steer officers away from trouble.

The move is a reflection of the depth of concern triggered by a series of misconduct cases in a military that prides itself on integrity and honor but has suffered an unusual number of stumbles after a decade of war.

Play Video

Play Video

What's next for Petraeus investigation?

In a memo to Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Panetta made no explicit reference to the David Petraeus sex scandal, which also has ensnared the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, Gen. John Allen.

Previously, Panetta has declined to describe the nature of the emails and other correspondence between Allen and Florida socialite Jill Kelley, which others have called flirtatious and potentially problematic for the Marine four-star general.

Sources have told CBS News that Paula Broadwell, Petraeus' biographer and mistress, allegedly sent an anonymous email to Allen warning him that Kelley was "a seductress."

Panetta's press secretary, George Little, said the memo was the product of internal Pentagon discussions that began before Petraeus announced he was resigning as CIA director because of an extramarital affair.

"I will emphasize very strongly that the secretary was going to embark on this course long before the matters that have come to light over the past week," Little said. He added that Panetta believes the vast majority of senior military officers serve with distinction and in accordance with ethical standards.

Panetta mentioned no specific cases of officer misconduct but noted in his memo to Dempsey that, "as has happened recently, when lapses occur, they have the potential to erode public confidence in our leadership and in our system for the enforcement of our high ethical standards. Worse, they can be detrimental to the execution of our mission to defend the American people."

A number of senior officers have faced disciplinary action this year for misconduct, including Gen. William "Kip" Ward, who was reduced in rank from four stars to three this week after investigators determined that he had misused government funds for lavish spending while commanding U.S. Africa Command.

Panetta told Dempsey to work with the chiefs of the Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps to review ethics training for officers to determine whether they are adequate, and to provide views on "how to better foster a culture of value-based decision-making and stewardship" among senior officers and their staffs. That is another way of saying Panetta wants a game plan for ending the string of bad behavior.

He said the initial results of the chiefs' review, along with their recommendations, should be ready in time for Panetta to report to President Obama by Dec. 1. The text of the Panetta memo, which he signed on Wednesday, was provided Thursday to reporters traveling with the Pentagon chief, who was in Bangkok for talks with senior Thai government officials in advance of Mr. Obama's visit here this weekend.

"Beyond mere compliance with the rules, I also expect senior officers and civilian executives to exercise sound judgment in their stewardship of government resources and in their personal conduct," Panetta said. "An action may be legally permissible but neither advisable nor wise."

Panetta said he intends to raise these issues in a meeting next month with all of the military service chiefs, the services' civilian leaders and the generals and admirals who lead major commands like U.S. Central Command.

Dempsey said Thursday that he has been concerned for many months about an apparent slip in ethical standards within the military — both in the officer corps and in the enlisted ranks. In an interview with the Pentagon's internal news service, American Forces Press Service, Dempsey said he noticed disturbing trends last spring.

"In response to these issues I have communicated through a memorandum to every four-star in every service," Dempsey said. "I expressed my concern and encouraged their interest and their active involvement in helping us to understand what really is going on and what's not."

Ethics issues associated with the Petraeus and Allen matters were raised during Panetta's joint news conference Thursday with his Thai counterpart, Sukampol Suwannathat. The two spoke to reporters after signing an update to a 1962 U.S.-Thai statement framing the security relationship. The United States and Thailand are treaty allies — a relationship that Washington sees as a cornerstone of its security interests in Asia.

Panetta said he knows of no other senior U.S. military officers being linked to the Petraeus investigation, and he said he retains "tremendous confidence" in Allen.

"I am not aware of any others that could be involved in this issue at the present time," he said, adding that he wanted the American public to understand that the vast majority of military officers serve ethically.

"One thing I do demand," he said, "is that those who seek to protect this country operate by the highest ethical standards."

Asked whether any of the emails between Allen and Kelley are sexually explicit, Panetta said, "What I don't want to do is to try to characterize those communications because I don't want to do anything" to limit the ability of the Pentagon inspector general to conduct an objective review of the Allen matter.

Panetta ordered the investigation Monday after the FBI referred the matter to the Pentagon's top lawyer. Allen issued a statement through his lawyer saying he is committed to cooperating fully with the investigation.

Panetta also told reporters he could not rule out the possibility that the Taliban in Afghanistan would try to use Petraeus' admission of the affair for propaganda purposes. Petraeus, who resigned Friday from his post as CIA director, was Allen's predecessor as top commander in Afghanistan, leaving in summer 2011.

Panetta is the first U.S. defense secretary to visit Thailand since 2008. The U.S. has no troops permanently stationed in Thailand but it conducts regular exercises with the Thai military and has numerous other forms of cooperation.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
20 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
olddog47 says:
Ethics in any organization begin with tone set at the top. Any guess who is at the top here!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sepa2 says:
Can the authorities of all parties can spend a teeny weeny time on economy also after attending all important issues of defense, mil-ind complex and our overblown heroes private affairs
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DOGGYPANTS says:
I don't understand why Petraeus and Allen and other Commanders lose their jobs while Bill Clinton, our Commander in Chief and CEO committed adultery in his office, and did not have to resign. Seems to me that Obama has rocks in his head.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
matt6052 says:
Beyond laws and regulations, there is only religious belief. If we were all of the same faith then values beyond Supreme Court tested laws would be okay. The reason there is a void of laws and regs in some areas is because SCOTUS has determined that it is unconstitutional for government to be there. So ethics? That's just religion by another name.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
KansasCity-2012 says:
Humans corrupt each other. Some resist better than others. This was done for the thrill. Cultures that hunt for thrills are far easier to corrupt.

War ops is not a thrill. Sales is a series of thrill. When war ops start thinking like sales people, we have trouble.

The answer is simple: Never promote a culture in war operations where sales mentality intrudes and entices a leader's mind with promises of thrills.

Keep thrills away from war department. It is suppose to be a boring duty to serve until the mission is over.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MIO42 says:
ON THE OTHER HAND
maybe Paula was just testing Security looking for VULNERABILITY !

Hey Hey Paula " I want to ,Marry you someday"

Oops can't say that she'll probably email me and want to hook up
reply
Bleddyn71 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Wonder if there is a sex tape with her getting smoked by 'Betrayus', does he make her call him "General" or is it the other way around.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
subsailor911 says:
OMG, Close the barn doors, the horses are out!!! Typical government response over a non-issue. WAIT! News Flash! The Puritans are landing at Plymouth Rock.......Again!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
snowcap12 says:
This is laughable. Ethics should start with the Commander in Chief and set the standard for all to follow. However, in this case, our current Commander in Chief has no ethics for anyone to follow.
reply
Jame-_V replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Political beliefs, religious beliefs and ethics are completely different things, you don't have to be a political or religious to act ethically, in fact when you don't have any political or religious agenda its allot easier to act ethical.

Also i don't really see how any of this is news, This shouldn't have even been on the front page of any story, so what if the general wanted to wet his willy that is his own deal and the only person he should have to answer to is his wife.

Now out of all this i did gather that Jill Kelly, which also shares the same name of a porn star, was allowed too much freedom and her sister is despicable for trying to win a custody battle by using the us military.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
LuKennedy says:
Ethics review? Excuse me, but hadn't the government better stay out of the panties of the military? What they do in their bedrooms...
reply
Bleddyn71 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
In the military you have to surrender some of you liberties.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
PourpaixPourpaix says:
This is rich ..... reviewing the chastity ethics of a pack of mass murderers. Washington is just full of bright ideas this week.
reply
Bleddyn71 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DEOPPRESSOLIBER-

LOL... well said ... and Sua Sponte back at you...
See all 20 Comments