CBS/AP/ November 8, 2012, 7:06 AM

Jared Loughner faces Tucson rampage victims

Jared Lee Loughner is seen in these undated booking photos provided by the U.S. Marshals Service.

Jared Lee Loughner is seen in these undated booking photos provided by the U.S. Marshals Service. / U.S. Marshals Service

Updated at 2:09 p.m. ET

TUCSON, Ariz. The man who went on a shooting rampage in Arizona last year that left six people dead and 13 others wounded is in court Thursday facing his victims, including former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, for the first time before being sentenced.

Jared Lee Loughner, who pleaded guilty to the January 2011 attack at a Giffords political event outside a Tucson, Ariz., grocery store, was led into the courtroom in shackles. He declined to make a statement when asked by U.S. District Judge Larry Burns as the hearing got underway, reports CBS News correspondent John Blackstone. But that didn't stop victims of that day from speaking their mind.

Mark Kelly, Giffords' husband who spoke on her behalf, told Loughner "you may have put a bullet through her head but you haven't put a dent in her spirit and her commitment to make the world a better place." p>

"Her life has been forever changed. Plans she had for our family and her career have been immeasurably altered," Kelly said at Loughner's sentencing. "Every day is a continuous stuggle to do those things she once was so good at."

Loughner showed no emotion, and looked at the other victims. His mother sobbed nearby.

Kelly also took aim at state politicians over the issue of gun control, saying the "political class ignores white elephant of gun violence," singling out Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer and the state legislature for saying guns not the problem.

The 24-year-old pleaded guilty three months ago to 19 federal charges under an agreement that guarantees he will spend the rest of his life in prison without the possibility of parole. The deal calls for the dismissal of 30 other charges and a sentence of seven consecutive life terms, followed by 140 years in prison.

15 Photos

Arizona gunman Jared Loughner

Both sides reached the deal after a judge declared that Loughner was able to understand the charges against him. After the shooting, he was diagnosed with schizophrenia and underwent forcible psychotropic drug treatments.

Some victims, including Giffords, welcomed the deal as a way to move on. It spared victims and their families from having to go through a potentially lengthy and traumatic trial and locks up the defendant for life.

Suzi Hileman, who was shot three times while trying to save her 9-year-old neighbor, addressed Loughner directly, saying "I have wanted to take you by the shoulders and shake you. But it wouldn't do any good."

"We've been told about your demons, about the illness that skewed your thinking," said Hileman, at times visibly shaking, to Loughner. "Your parents, your schools, your community, they all failed you.

"It's all true," Hileman said. "It's not enough."

"You pointed a weapon and shot me three times," she said, staring directly at Loughner. He looked back at her. "And now I walked out of this courtroom and into the rest of my life and I won't think of you again."

Christina Pietz, the court-appointed psychologist who treated Loughner, had warned that although Loughner was competent to plead guilty, he remained severely mentally ill and his condition could deteriorate under the stress of a trial.

When Loughner first arrived at a Missouri prison facility for treatment, he was convinced Giffords was dead, even though he was shown a video of the shooting. He eventually realized she was alive after he was forcibly medicated.

It's unknown whether Pima County prosecutors, who have discretion on whether to seek the death penalty against Loughner, will file state charges against him. Stephanie Coronado, a spokeswoman for Pima County Attorney Barbara LaWall, said Wednesday that no decision had been made.

It's unclear where Loughner will be sent to serve his federal sentence. He could return to a prison medical facility like the one in Springfield, Mo., where he's been treated for more than a year. Or he could end up in a prison such as the federal lockup in Florence, Colo., that houses some of the country's most notorious criminals, including Oklahoma City bombing conspirator Terry Nichols and "Unabomber" Ted Kaczynski.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
48 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MikeElliott says:
Like some kind of a hero, Loughner now releases a Lee Harvey Oswald type of expression for all of us to see. It sure looks as though this guy entertains the thought of being famous. More and more deranged young men, scared of life itself and their place in it, prefer to take up a Loughner "strike back" mentality rather than commit suicide (the very thought they most likely and originally contemplated). More gun control policies need to be in place to stop these kind of cowardly creeps from having the means to destroy other peoples lives and simply because they could not muster the courage to live their own.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hypnotoad72 says:
"Loughner showed no emotion, and looked at the other victims."

Who needs Darwin's theories? Loughner is a psychopath. Let justice take its course - he won't emote either way.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
51saint says:
Can someone please tell me why it takes over a year, hundreds of thousands, if not millions, to come to the conclusion that this crazy maniac shot people, killed them with no sign of remorse, when many people saw him do it? And that isn't really what's bothering me as much as the absolutely ludicrous sentence of 7 life sentences THEN 140 years added on for good measure! How long did it take those high paid geniuses in our justice system to think that one up?!
The United States is a wonderful nation but as it matures there are more and more instances of waste. Waste of time, waste of money, waste of resources, and waste of sanity. Look at how convoluted our laws are, our courts are a joke, the attorneys are more criminal than a lot of the people they serve and it has begun to get embarrassing! Third world countries justice systems often makes more sense than ours, one criminal, one crime, one sentence (often with a bullet in the offender's skull)! No trying him for 117 crimes, at $120,000 a pop and a multitude of attorneys figuring out if he indeed took out some guys finger or was it already damaged from a work incident!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
NauckWindSong says:
It would be Murder to take his life for he is with out real sense of defense thus defense less thus confined Jailed thus not a harm to the Public..benefit of clergy (Law Latin Privilegium clericale), Thus was used By John Adams 1767-1770? Trail john adams boston massacre trial Defense, Thus was in part to have become of how the 8th Amendment come to be , The Great Mercy. Let be the confession of mens ers be the conviction to be Condemned of the Act by constitutions of sounds Constitutions of such men in courts of law by many minds with the open door of our savior !
reply
NauckWindSong replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I have my reservation of Guilt & Convictions , This case sound alot like a cold war Hit. and not limited to the use o psychotronics or spelled with "M" psychotromics and the cold War and the Lsd Trials. and the Wood ******
Mind control through substances is possible and was ...The events of sought control from the research I have done for a Book I am writing trying to complete, such events did take place..thus was done with very carefully picked people that One did not know anything about the matter . the base core of such is nothing more then suggestions, put into a state of hypnosis played on the views of faith as like Gods Speaking to a person. thus people being tested was lied to and told its was mental IIness, Some of the trials done was done with metal tubes in the ears or or the use of say Amalgam in the teeth playing with the tones and signal hertz, Drugs was used to help the matters along, such things as simpe as putting micro phones in things in rooms where the subject was made to very easy to then keep such ruses going... latter years LSD was used in the cold war trial not to for the mis use of 'Psychic Warfare Yes it was done, The Nazis used such in creation of parts of what become the S.S. an other nations did the same things . if you have cell phone your using something that was aprt of many many abused people... There was a movie not long ago done that has some back ground with such history --- not limited to Valkyrie
linkicon reporticon emailicon
KansasCity-2012 says:
It is strange how Arizona differed until after the election for this case.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lukebize says:
My only wish is that if Arizona decides not to try Loughner for capital crimes ending with a death sentence, IF he is to be kept alive until his natural death, that they take and store frequent pictures of him so that IF he ever escapes, they have up-to-date images they can distribute publicly to ensure that he never goes free.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
-_i_- says:
for all the people commenting that he should receive the death penalty: I take it you do not believe in "Darwinian evolution"... because if you did believe in evolution and if he is dead isn't it just over for him - just null and void - no feeling?? He gets "peace"?? Wouldn't his remaining "meaningless life" in prison followed by a "meaningless death" be more tortuous to him ??

But the problem is if you believe that, then why get upset that anyone murders anyone else??? Aren't we all just an accident of time and proper conditions in an immense universe??? A bunch of "apes" that just happened to have figured out how to build cars??? And emotions, what about those? Morals? Human rights? they are all just illusion... or how our evolved brains perceive certain stimuli coupled with a "cultural evolution" from our "social interaction".... so whats it matter !?!?!?! If abortion is fine just because the mother has a "good" excuse or justification, then why is wrong to abort a more mature/grown ape/man/woman ?!?!
reply
spellcheckguy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Your comment is quite interesting in that it provokes thought about what and who we are as a species. As humans we have the ability to override the more destructive aspects of our instinctual urges by using our unique abilities to love, hate and reason. Our varying levels of compassion create constant debate as to what is considered acceptable behavior. Thankfully, the vast majority of us believe that killing a fellow citizen for some sort of perceived personal gain is wrong. Strangely, killing a child who would be born at an inconvenient time is often considered acceptable when this act is promoted under the banner of women's rights. Even stranger is the fact that this same "progressive" group consider themselves a more compassionate group than conservatives. Conservatives are more likely to accept killing an adult as a viable punishment option for serious crimes. Many "progressive" thinkers feel it is uncivilized to administer the death penalty to a grown adult for any crime.
Your comment makes me want to break out some of my old textbooks to try and understand why anyone would consider it ok to kill a child...., but not a child killer...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rcchristi1 says:
I would kill him in the streets if I ever saw him. Jack Ruby style. The lawyers and the judge are white collar crooks killing us financially with their legalized stealing from the middle class by way of the perfectly legitimate tax us to death method.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
-_i_- says:
for all the people commenting that he should receive the death penalty: I take it you do not believe in "Darwinian evolution"... because if you did believe in evolution and if he is dead isn't it just over for him - just null and void - no feeling?? He gets "peace"?? Wouldn't his remaining "meaningless life" in prison followed by a "meaningless death" be more tortuous to him ??

But the problem is if you believe that, then why get upset that anyone murders anyone else??? Aren't we all just an accident of time and proper conditions in an immense universe??? A bunch of "apes" that just happened to have figured out how to build cars??? And emotions, what about those? Morals? Human rights? they are all just illusion... or how our evolved brains perceive certain stimuli coupled with a "cultural evolution" from our "social interaction".... so whats it matter !?!?!?! If abortion is fine just because the mother has a "good" excuse or justification, then why is wrong to abort a more mature/grown ape/man/woman ?!?!
reply
athinkingAmerican replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Believing the theory of evolution doesn't, in any way, conflict with a belief in God. Schmuck.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Strykeroee says:
These plea bargain deals that let heinous and cowardly mass killers live out the rest of their lives at taxpayer expense are an obscenity. What it will cost to support this sorry excuse for a human could send a lot of kids to college and fix a few streets. Just execute him and be done with it. Oh, but I forgot... he has rights.
reply
JayRalf1234 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Agreed
samuraidrive replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You can appeal til the day you die if you are sentenced to death. This is what makes capital punishment more expensive than life in prison.
See all 4 Replies
See all 48 Comments