AP/ November 7, 2012, 5:28 PM

Anti-Muslim filmmaker sentenced to one year for probation violation

Mark Basseley Youssef, the man linked to the anti-Muslim film believed to have sparked so much unrest, is taken out of his home to be interviewed by federal probation officers.

Mark Basseley Youssef, the man linked to the anti-Muslim film believed to have sparked so much unrest, is taken out of his home to be interviewed by federal probation officers.

LOS ANGELESThe California man behind an anti-Muslim film that roiled the Islamic world was sentenced Wednesday to a year in prison for violating his probation stemming from a 2010 bank fraud conviction by lying about his identity.

U.S. District Court Judge Christina Snyder immediately sentenced Mark Basseley Youssef after he admitted to four of the eight alleged violations, including obtaining a fraudulent California driver's license. Prosecutors agreed to drop the other four allegations under an agreement with Youssef's attorneys, which also included more probation.

None of the violations had to do with the content of "Innocence of Muslims," a film that depicts Mohammad as a religious fraud, pedophile and womanizer.

  • Anti-Islam filmmaker denies probation violation
  • Anti-Muslim filmmaker jailed, reveals real name
  • Pakistan hit by deadly riots over anti-Muslim film
  • Judge won't force removal of anti-Muslim film clip
  • However, Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Dugdale argued Youseff's lies about his identity have caused harm to others, including the film's cast and crew. The movie sparked violence in the Middle East, killing dozens.

    "They had no idea he was a recently released felon," Dugdale said Wednesday. "Had they known that, they might have had second thoughts" about being part of the film.

    Youssef's attorney Steven Seiden said his client admits to being the film's scriptwriter but had no other involvement except what he described as being a "cultural adviser."

    Youssef, 55, was arrested in late September, just weeks after he went into hiding when the deadly violence erupted in the Middle East.

    Play Video

    Anti-U.S. protests spread across Muslim world

    64 Photos

    Muslim world protests anti-Islamic film

    Play Video

    Consultant on anti-Muslim film speaks out

    Enraged Muslims had demanded severe punishment for Youssef, with a Pakistani cabinet minister even offering $100,000 to anyone who kills him.

    Federal authorities initially sought a two-year sentence for Youssef but settled on a one-year term after negotiating a deal with Youssef's attorneys. Prosecutors said they wouldn't pursue new charges against Yousseff - namely making false statements - and would drop the remaining four probation-violation allegations leveled against him. But Youssef was placed on four years' probation and must be truthful about his identity and his future finances.

    Seiden asked that his client be placed under home confinement, but Snyder denied that request. Youssef will spend his time behind bars at a Southern California prison.

    Youssef served most of his 21-month prison sentence for using more than a dozen aliases and opening about 60 bank accounts to conduct a check fraud scheme, prosecutors said.

    After he was released from prison, Youssef was barred from using computers or the Internet for five years without approval from his probation officer.

    Federal authorities have said they believe Youssef is responsible for the film, but they haven't said whether he was the person who posted it online. He also wasn't supposed to use any name other than his true legal name without the prior written approval of his probation officer.

    At least three names have been associated with Youssef since the film trailer surfaced - Sam Bacile, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula and Youssef. Bacile was the name attached to the YouTube account that posted the video.

    "This is a defendant who has engaged in a long pattern of deception," Dugdale said. "His dishonesty goes back years."

    Court documents show Youssef legally changed his name from Nakoula in 2002, though when he was tried, he identified himself as Nakoula. He wanted the name change because he believed Nakoula sounded like a girl's name, according to court documents.

    After the hearing, Seiden told reporters he had a message to relay from his client.

    "The one thing he wanted me to tell all of you is President Obama may have gotten Osama bin Laden, but he didn't kill the ideology," Seiden said.

    Asked what that meant, Seiden said, "I didn't ask him, and I don't know."

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
13 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
eroteme2 says:
I wonder if the Obama admnistration (Obama) has sufficiently and adequately apologized to the Muslim world. More apology may not hurt. There are so many Muslims who have not (yet) murdered anyone.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
aintthispeachy says:
Where are these dozens of people killed over this film? Our national security advisers said there were no protests over this movie. This creep was picked up and jailed and sentenced to prison to fill the Obama narrative.
reply
BWB2020 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
He was jailed originally or check fraud.

His current sentence is the consequence of his admission to parole violations.

It is funny how anti-Obama baggers forget that probation violation is an abrogation of a court-ordered restriction in lieu of serving time in prison, and therefore results in the re-imposition of the original sentence.

But then again, baggers are wont to ignore law when it conflicts with their agenda.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ulgnud says:
Looks like they had to come up with something to placate the Muslims. He certainly did not go to prison for making a movie.
reply
BWB2020 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Correct, he is being jailed for violating probation conditions and restrictions.

He committed check fraud, and was jailed as a thief. e was given a chance at probation, and blew it.

He plead guilty to four of eight violations, and so, like anyone else who violates probation, he goes back to jail.

What's the matter, didn't you read the article before posting?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
imnotimportant says:
This is a terrible person. He manipulated and lied to people in order to produce this short movie.

Just pretend that I talked some Jewish people into playing parts in a documentary about world war two and after editing it, the movie turned out to be a documentary to disprove the holocaust.

That is what this person did. The actors in it were told they were making one kind of movie and it was edited to be something else.

Everyone deserves the right to be heard, but not the right to manipulate others to speak for them.
reply
mandiegracetaylor replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
There was this very vocal young woman who clearly had the part of a character dressed in a middle eastern costume dropping his head between her two naked legs - she was dressed up like a Biblical character herself - why do these people get to abscond on any, any, any responsibility for their own choices - they don't vet the movie - the script - the producers - they get a few hundred dollars to act like this on a blue screened set? Who on this board would go on a set memorize a script and character that has them behaving like frat house refugees hiring a prostitute for an hour for an actor's minimum day wage? Then spend the rest of their personal victimizing themselves when all hell breaks loose over their own bizarre behavior? Only in the States folks -
flexsf replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The content of the film could be replaced with Jesus and his professional, bigot, sexist followers who feel entitled to prevent and repeal laws from certain groups of people in the U.S. Catholic Inc. and it's intrusive, zealot followers aren't any different from the Muslim professional zionists and their intrusive, zealot followers. The thing that makes the U.S., professional bigots more worse than the professional Muslim bigots is the Muslim bigots aren't in denial of their discriminatory practices.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
audemus says:
Gee....wouldn't it be a shame if he met up with some pissed-off Muslim Brother behind bars with nothing to lose ?
reply
BWB2020 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Not to forget to mention 100,000 bux to gain for his family! Sounds like a good deal all around...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MickProPer says:
"None of the violations had to do with the content of 'Innocence of Muslims',". Yeah, right. Not sure if the un-named article author is really that stupid, or just thinks we are - either way, it's a pretty poor excuse for journalism.
"I just have to look good; I don't have to be clear!"
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jt92202 says:
Youssef, 55, was arrested in late September, just weeks after he went into hiding when deadly violence erupted in Libya and other parts of the Middle East in response to the movie.

CBS I thought you were better than this, you know as well as most people that has followed this story that the film had NOTHING NOTHING to do with the Libia violence! Stop trying to cover up what actually happened, we have enough info that tells us that the film was not the problem in Libia!!
reply
Mathion replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Unlike the folks who fail to understand how the world works, CBS hasn't lied about anything.

There WAS unrest in Libya over this film BEFORE the attack on the compound. Right now, it appears that may have only been convenient timing for the terrorists who attacked the compound. The attack itself,it is speculated, was a long time in planning.

The film wasn't the reason for the attack. It was merely a convenient cover. Nor did CBS say that the film sparked the attack.

Given that the unrest was middle-east-wide, it's not unreasonable to assume from the start that if people are out there being violent and chanting "Death to America" (Despite the fact the film maker was Egyptian) over a film, similar violence against America was likely motivated by the same thing. That the assumption was wrong came out in the investigation, which is still ongoing.

Hence why there's an investigation and hence why it's pretty stupid to jump to conclusions without the benefit of knowing all the facts.

But CBS didn't report anything wrong or misleading. It's how you read it. I'm sorry that you read things that aren't there, but it's best to read what IS there and try not to project your own prejudices (as much as it's even possible for closed-minded people to do) into it.
See all 13 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right