AP/ November 6, 2012, 11:16 AM

Ex-subordinate says Army general facing sex crimes charges threatened to kill her

This undated photo provided by the U.S. Army shows Brig. Gen. Jeffrey A. Sinclair.

This undated photo provided by the U.S. Army shows Brig. Gen. Jeffrey A. Sinclair. / AP Photo/U.S. Army

FORT BRAGG, N.C. A former subordinate to an Army general facing sex crimes charges testified Tuesday that the general started an affair with her in Iraq and later threatened to kill her and her family if she told anyone.

The woman says she was honored at first by the attention from Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair, who she said was highly regarded. They first had sex in 2008 at a forward operating base in Iraq, she said.

"I was extremely intimidated by him. Everybody in the brigade spoke about him like he was a god," she said. The Associated Press does not identify victims of alleged sexual assaults.

Now a captain, she testified on the second day of a military hearing at Fort Bragg on whether there was enough evidence to court-martial Sinclair on charges including forcible sodomy, wrongful sexual conduct and engaging in inappropriate relationships.

It is a rare criminal case against a general and the details from the hearing are the first public narrative of the alleged offenses that prosecutors say involved a total of five women: four of them military subordinates and one a civilian.

During the testimony, Sinclair repeatedly rolled his eyes, sighed audibly and stared at his former aide from the defense table. She did not look at him.

The captain testified that she believed Sinclair's threats because he had gone through special forces training, knew how to kill with his hands and had a reputation as a killer in battle.

Sinclair was deputy commander in charge of logistics and support for the 82nd Airborne Division in Afghanistan before being abruptly relieved in May amid a criminal probe. He has been on special assignment since then at Fort Bragg, the sprawling post that is home to the 82nd Airborne.

Sinclair's former commanding officer, Maj. Gen. James Huggins, testified Monday that he launched the criminal investigation that led to the charges after the female captain told him Sinclair forced her to have sex.

Huggins said that on March 19, the captain came to his office late at night in tears. She reported that she had been involved in a three-year sexual affair with Sinclair, then her direct commander and a married man. Adultery is a crime under the military code of justice.

According to Huggins, the captain said Sinclair had once forced her to perform oral sex on him, but that she also had sex willingly with her boss at Army bases in the United States and on deployments to Germany, Iraq and at the airborne division's headquarters in Afghanistan.

When she had tried to end the affair, Sinclair had threatened her and persisted in pushing for sex, according to Huggins' testimony. But she also told Huggins she finally decided to report Sinclair after finding emails exchanged with other women in his account.

The captain testified that Sinclair could be cold and demeaning to her and other women in the brigade, calling some of the other women degrading names.

She testified she told him he shouldn't talk about female officers that way.

"He said, 'He was a general and he could say whatever the (expletive) he wanted," she testified.

She said Sinclair was extremely controlling, even telling her when and where she could use the bathroom.

She described two instances where he forced her to perform oral sex. Prosecutors asked if he would have been able to determine that she did not want to participate and she responded: "Yes, I was crying."

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
22 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sparkela says:
Miserable Misogynistic misanthropes, blaming the victim, homophobic insults--is this Fox News?
No! I get it- it's Troll Central!
Jerks.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ulgnud says:
Based on what was reported I don't buy it. She happily "Did It" with him for how many years? He knows how to take life? Well DUH. He is a soldier. That is what they do if needed. I really hope the courts expect to see some evidence. Not just her word.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lifeduringwartime says:
Forcible sodomy. Freaky closet **** for sure.
reply
lifeduringwartime replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ugacrew says:
This "intimidated" female had every opportunity to request a transfer.
A "victim" does not carry on a "prolonged" affair. She is a woman scorned and has to come to grips with the truth. That truth is that she should have tried to find a husband of her own and not tampered with someone else's for her own personal gain. No sympathy here. As a military spouse, to state that she had no other choice because he was a general is pure hogwash. To now play the part of an innocent victim is the only alternative she has and that is more than pure hogwash.
reply
Mathion replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
"Request a transfer"? Who the hell do you THINK that transfer request goes through?

Sinclair. He's her commanding officer. It's called a "chain of command" for a reason. Everything that goes outside of the command goes through the CO's office.

Secondly, her own career could have been destroyed by Sinclair, which is one reason sexual relations with people in your chain of command are forbidden.

Request a transfer... What a joke.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
John782011 says:
As officers both of them were cognizant of the ramifications of their actions, that being said, having previously known a flag officer who also got caught, he is in control. Similar to the CEO of a company. Those that think he will get off easily I doubt it, because the threats not just to this one lady but to the others. If all charges are proven, he will be spending a few years in Ft Levenworth.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
audemus says:
Sadly, this General is somewhat representative of America's military actions and attitudes. Don't think the world hasn't noticed....
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Martha12345 says:
If he was an enlisted man, he'd be in Fort Levenworth already.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rwsmith29456 says:
Except for the threats, she is as guilty as he is.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Groundhog666 says:
General, SUCK IT
Captain, Yes sir
reply
rwsmith29456 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
That's "Yes sir, SIR!"
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hemusbull says:
Is this general from the same base as the muslim psycho who killed 13 colegues? So this one isn't better although he saved their lifes...Good grief!
reply
See all 22 Comments