CBS/AP/ November 5, 2012, 2:26 PM

Medical examiner: African dogs killed boy who fell into Pittsburgh zoo exhibit

PITTSBURGH The head of the Pittsburgh Zoo says a medical examiner has concluded that a toddler who fell into an African painted dog exhibit Sunday was killed by the animals, not by the fall.

Barbara Baker, CEO and president of the Pittsburgh Zoo and PPG Aquarium, said she received that information from the medical examiner's office Monday.

Officials say the child's mother had placed the three-year-old boy on a wooden rail above the exhibit. There is a net below the rail, but Baker says the boy bounced off it and into the enclosure 14 feet below.

She says the animals attacked the child so quickly that by the time a veterinarian and other zoo staffers arrived seconds later, they determined it would have been futile to try to rescue the child.

"From what I understand, what occurred at that scene until it was secured, it was horrific," Lt. Kevin Kraus of the Pittsburgh police told CBS affiliate KDKA.

KDKA in reports the Pittsburgh Zoo & PPG Aquarium says it will be closed until further notice.

Witnesses and officials described a chaotic scene. When the boy fell, other visitors immediately told staff members, who responded along with Pittsburgh police. Zookeepers called off the dogs, and seven of them immediately went to a back building. Three more eventually were drawn away from the boy, but the last dog wouldn't come into the building, and police had to shoot him, Baker told the station.

african painted dog

An African painted dog

/ KDKA

The dogs are about as big as medium-sized domestic dogs, 2 to 2.5 feet high and 37 to 80 pounds, according to the zoo. African wild dogs are also known as cape hunting dogs, spotted dogs, and painted wolves. They have large, rounded ears and dark brown circles around their eyes and are considered endangered.

Police and the Allegheny County medical examiner's office were investigating. Baker said the zoo, which has never had a visitor death, plans an internal investigation, and no decision has been made yet on the future of the exhibit.

The dogs normally live in a 1.5-acre exhibit called the Painted Dog Bush Camp that's part of a larger open area called the African Savanna, where elephants, lions and other animals can be seen.

In May, some of the dogs crawled under a fence and escaped into a part of the exhibit that's usually closed. The zoo was on lockdown for about an hour as a precaution.

Ten African painted dogs were born at the zoo in 2009, and their mother died of a ruptured uterus shortly after delivering the litter. Five of the pups survived. The mortality rate for painted pups is 50 percent, even when born in the wild to a healthy mother.

It was only the second litter to be hand-raised in captivity, along with one in the United Kingdom, zoo officials said at the time.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
69 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
themotherisatfault says:
One of the arguments someone on here is trying to make is that the mother didn't put the son on the railing. Someone else on this post listed that the railing was 5' high. If this is true, then the mother had to have put the son on the railing. Unless the mother is 7' tall, if she was shorter, if the son would have squirmed in her arms, while at chest height, he couldn't have gone over the railing. She had to have put him on there. IDIOT. Not worthy of being called a mother.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
themotherisatfault says:
Folks, quit defending the mother. Obviously, those close, near and dear to her - are going to believe this did not happen due to the mother's carelessness.

In this case the mother failed to use good old fashioned COMMON SENSE.

First, everything I have heard says she placed the child on the railing. Where would this come from? The mother must have made her statements when they happened, and is now recanting and changing the story to make herself sound less stupid.

She was obviously close enough to the edge of the railing, where even if she didn't have her child on the railing (which I believe she did put the child on the railing), she should have held that child with all her might. COMMON SENSE.

When I take my kids to amusement parks, I hang onto them with all my might, so that they don't fly off rides and such. It's COMMON SENSE.

This mother failed parenting 101, in a bad way. Tragically, at her son's expense. Poor child. What a way to die.

I personally think the mother needs some jail time. Even though she'll be "castigated" her entire life, knowing she killed her son - she needs jail time as she put this poor child, in danger's way, and ultimately, he got EATEN ALIVE, due to her negligence and recklessness.

IDIOT mom. IDIOT.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
maggiemay01111 says:
the mother was wrong sorry 100%. There's no way the zoo is going to make it easy for something like that to happen. Where ever that kid was placed or being held, was putting him at risk if he fell.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mdoc173 says:
NEWSTER90210
I read the zoo did pass its evaluation as well. But it also stated: It was recommended that the railings add something ontop of them preventing people from standing, leaning, sitting or placing a child upon the railing. I read they chose to do renovations to the snack bar area instead of making any additions or changes to the railings in the zoo. How can you say the mother should face charges without knowing what happened? I do beleive the dogs behaved instinctively from what has been reported by the zoo, witnesses and authorities. I beleive the dog was shot to try to salvage what was left of the little boy's body. I am not saying the zoo is at fault - just saying this all could have been prevented with a sheet of plexiglass. Obviously the codes and inspections should be updated and reviewed/revised. Regardless if the zoo passed inspection - obviously there is room for improvement.
reply
Chelly6261 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
i think this all could have been avoided if she would have kept the child in her arms. These are wild animals for a reason and a two year old does not need to be that up close a personal. I know it was a learning experiance for the mother..i just sorry this was the experiance.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mdoc173 says:
SMARTS13
IncrediBALLY - would be a spelling error not a grammar error. There is no need to resort to name calling. I am sorry - I was unaware that you were there and saw first hand the events that took place. I find you INCREDIBLY ignorant. How can you pass judgement on someone you don't know? I am assumming you were NOT there. Hence, making speculations about an event that you know nothing about. Regardless, I am sure we can agree that if there was a piece of plexiglass covering the opening this tragedy could have been avoided. I do beleive this still enables the visitors to see the animals well and is an added measure the zoo could take to prevent something like this happening again.
That comment was a response for ERMASMU111 apparently a Canadian who was claimimg American parents are stupid. FYI - Glass Houses People????? Just because they used the word "ain't" I did not make the assumption that they were stupid or a bad parent. And certainly did NOT resort to name calling. Just wanted to point out how easy it is to make a mistake. Evidently I made a spelling error, which I was quickly called on. I have yet to meet a PERFECT person. I feel the mother is being condemed by many without absolute knowledge/facts about how this tragedy took place. I find peoples ignorance incredibly irritating.
SMARTS13 - doesnt seem like you are being very smart. I find your comment very childish!!!You know there are ways to get your point across without name calling - right???
Prayer and thoughts go to the family and friends of little Maddox
reply
Stain69x replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Spelling is a part of grammar. You mean grammatical error.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Momahablog says:
http://blogs.momaha.com/2012/11/26293/
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mdoc173 says:
Everyone needs to get the facts straight before condemning anyone - This comes straight from a source close to the family. The mother DID NOT set him on the railing. She was holding him so he could see and he JUMPED out of her arms. She was NOT dangling him over the edge by any means. It apparently happened so quickly. It is often easy to pass judgement about people(mother of child) because of what the media had portrayed about the situation. It is also very easy to be mislead by the media. Sadly I am afraid that is what is happening here. After reading a tremendous load of negative comments... enough is enough. Shut your mouths until you have the FACTS. Those who are posting those comments are ignorant of the facts in the situation.

And to comment on the netting under the railing - I am asssumimg it was put in there because of all the stuff they were finding in the exhibit (sunglasses, cameras, phones etc.) If that stuff can so easily find its way in there (Drop) you would think they would put up some sort of plexiglass to prevent anything(random items, small children, even older children) from getting in the exhibit. Its a shame to think a piece of plexiglass could have eliminated this entire tradegy. I did research and the zoo railings were NOT up to the current codes. Regardless of posted signs - no posted signs - The visitors at the zoo should not have easy access to the exhibits (dens) Children will be children - i am a teacher could easily see one of my students goofing around with friends and ending up in a terrible situation. It is the job of the zoo to ensure and prevent access to these areas. Especially dangerous wild animals. I remember reading about a mentally challenged man who wanted to be at one with the tigers and somehow got access into their living exhibit and was attacked. There should be NO WAY A VISITOR should be able to get into these areas.

It is just sad that it takes a terrible event like this for Pittsburgh Zoo and zoos all over the country to reevaluate the exhibits and the safety of the exhibits. They need to make sure it is not only safe for the animals but the people visiting and the staff caring for them. Better view of wild animal or a safe secure exhibit sight.
reply
marcie10000 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Thank you for your reasoned and heartfelt explanation, MDC. It's common sense that no wild dog exhibit should have allowed such easy entry. It was an accident waiting to happen, whether in this instance or by running and playing children who want to get closer to the "doggies." My guess is that the zoo was complacent and unfamiliar with pack behavior. I'd like to see the regulations regarding wild dog exhibits as I'm pretty sure our zoo has them (hyenas) behind tall walls and they are viewable only behind glass.
Chelly6261 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I'm not saying its anyones fault... but I dont think we can blame the ZOO... you know exactly were your taking your child too. The animals did not leave there exhibit and with a 2 and 3 year old.. im sure it was the first time the child attempted to Jump out of her ARMS.. as the mother it was HER job to watch over and protect her child. I hope your not geering them up for a lawsuit...
See all 5 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Natural_Selection says:
It is bad enough that we have resulted in the observation of caged wild animals for entertainment, but now we have to accommodate brainless humans like this mother who sacrificed her child's life. According to the information presented, the zoo passed all recent inspections regarding exhibit safety and should not be held liable for this incident. The excuse that there was not accurate signage posted is ridiculous. If zoos have to post "accurate signage" warning idiots of potential harm, there would be signs posted in every square foot of the zoo. "Make sure that your shoelaces are tied"... "Do not pet the peacocks"..."Do not let your child squish their face against the glass in the tiger exhibit"..."Please do not throw personal items at the bears"...You have got to be kidding me! The zoo had railings installed at a 45-degree angle to prevent people from sitting on them and/or setting things/kids on them. If you ask me, the zoo went above and beyond to accommodate their visitors. Most businesses, like zoos, operate under the understanding that their visitors have some common sense. If you don't have any common sense, don't leave your house and please don't reproduce! I find it funny that the zoo visitors expected zoo personnel to jump in and save the child, why would they risk their lives to save some idiot's offspring? That is not their job. It is truly a tragedy that an endangered African painted dog had to die because of some stupid woman and her carelessness. Regarding the grieving mother and dead child, I would call that natural selection.
reply
mdoc173 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Above and beyond...would be eliminating access to the exhibit. Especially one with dangerous wild animals. There is plexiglass and or netting surrounding all sides but one. This should have been secured with glass as well.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
LikaLaruku says:
Stupid b**ch. I hope she spends the rest of her life paying off her child endangerment fine & gets charged an additional fine for events that led to the death of an endangered animal. I also hope that the person who shot the dog instead of tranquilized it gets sued by PETA, the ASPCA, & The Humane Society.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lil68cia says:
I'm really shaken over this story, but even more shaken over all the rude comments i've been reading on the interent. I was not there too see this happen, nor did half of you. I'm defiantly not one to judge the mother. The mother, nor the family and friends she was with, has not got a chance to talk to the news. Everyone is just assuming things. You say you would jump in, yet, if you were there, im sure you wouldn't. It sounds easy to say, but if you were there, I doubt you would. Another thing, who knows if an adult could fit through the space the poor child fell into. The space has mesh to catch small objects. The mother was trying to give her child a better view (I personally would never stand my child on a railing over an exhibit)of the dogs. I highly doubt she knew or wanted this to happen. Could you imagine this happening to your young child, let alone get on the internet and have to read all this negativity against yourself. Personally, i'm not saying it was the zoo or the mothers fault, but the zoo should have taken it into consideration all possibiltys that could happen when making an exhibit. There is not one child I know, that when you look away for one second, there running off getting into something. This could have happened to anyone. A random child could run off for 1 second and climb up there (if possible). If anyone of you are parents, and saying harsh things about this parent, take a time to think about if this could have been you trying to give your kid a better view of something and this happened. No one knows this woman other than her family and friends. And by showing she had the time to even take her child to the zoo, sounds to me like she cared about her child. You can't judge someone by an accident!
reply
Stain69x replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nor did half of us? Lmao where did you come up with that? Must of been of packed zoo, maybe he was bumped from behind with how many people were there. I wish I was there with half of the people on the internet.
maggiemay01111 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
listen, the bottom line is that kid fell. You take your child to a zoo, you have to have common sense, you have to be in control of your child especially a toddler. This isn't some kid that strayed and drowned in a pool. He was looking at a dog exhibit that I'm sure had warning signs somewhere. Yet still he was allowed to be at a point where he could fall. I have been to zoos with my newphews when they were small, common sense, you know when you're to close or they are on a railing with a drop beyond the railing. Didn't she get scard, didn't she get concerned. Someone wrote the kid jumped out of her arms, honestly, she knows a toddler cannot be trusted, that's why there are parents, to watch their kids. No one is saying anything that we're all not thinking. this is 100% negligence on the mom's fault, no one is saying she shouldn't be sad or grieving, but this is her fault, case closed
See all 69 Comments