WASHINGTON A federal appeals court in Washington is considering whether marijuana should be reclassified from its current status as a dangerous drug with no accepted medical use.
Last year, the Drug Enforcement Administration rejected a petition by medical marijuana advocates to change the classification, which kept marijuana in the same category as drugs such as heroin. The DEA concluded that there wasn't a consensus opinion among experts on using marijuana for medical purposes. The petition had been filed in 2002.
A medical marijuana group, Americans for Safe Access, want the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to force the agency to hold a hearing and conduct findings based on the scientific record.
The group's lawyer, Joe Elford, said that the DEA had misapplied the law. He added there are numerous studies that show marijuana is effective as a medical treatment. The group's legal brief said marijuana could help people with chronic pain and the negative side effects of chemotherapy, among other things.
Marijuana is classified under "Schedule I" of controlled substances, meaning it has a high potential for abuse and no currently accepted medical use. It's lumped in with drugs like heroin, LSD and ecstasy. Americans for Safe Access want to see it reclassified to a less restrictive schedule.
Justice Department lawyer Lena Watkins said that marijuana is properly classified.
"It's the most widely abused drug in the United States," she said.
Tuesday's hearing was packed to capacity with many medical marijuana supporters in the audience.
The judges who will decide the case are Karen LeCraft Henderson, a Republican appointee, and Harry T. Edwards and Merrick B. Garland, both Democratic appointees.
Marijuana though bought illeagally and over used for recreational purposes has less effects on your system, and impairs you much less than the use of alcohol.
To be honest any matter of legalize the drug will eventually make its appeal less wondrous to the world. How many kids get busted for underage drinking only to not care about it much once they get past their 21st year. It just isn't that alluring any more.
Nothing makes people want to do something more than that condescending voice of mother dear saying "Oh no you don't"
I'm glad that another serious bid to re-classify Cannabis is being undertaken, but I'm also a little more pessimistic this time around.
WE already HAVE laws for DUI, for public intoxication and for criminal offenses. Why not STOP putting people in prison for the possesion of a plant or a mushroom? It is a bizarre question, made so by the bizarre laws of an antiquated time.
The facts are reliable and it is VERY evident that it is simply the economic interests of various existing "industries" tied drug enforcement that oppose any measure to de-criminalize or legalize.
The overwhelming data comnfirms that cannabis DOES have medical benefits and it should IMMEDIATELY be removed from the so-called "Schedule I" drug list!
On a related issue, the current legislation illegalizes the growing of HEMP, a close cannabis relative, but is nearly devoid of pyschoactive components! BUT, the product STILL makes for the best rope available, along with hemp paper, and a WEALTH of other related products! Our northern neighbor, Canada, has already started hemp production and is BEATING us in sales!
All this due to UTTER stupidity in our government! It is estimated that hemp agriculture cpuld add BILLIONS to our economy and ADD JOBS!
How many deaths has marijuana been implicated in that were not the result of its prohibition? That is the question to ask, if one is looking to establish harm. Apparently no one has ever died from marijuana: People have died from taking aspirin or even drinking too much water, let alone the harms that come from alcohol or tobacco, both of which are drugs.
Isn't it time to get over this craziness that was initially, deceptively based on racism and financial gain, and which continues to imprison people and ruin lives, while keeping them from natural non-toxic pain relief?