AP/ October 10, 2012, 4:53 AM

Terminally ill cancer patient embarrassed by airport pat-down

Michelle Dunaj on Tuesday

Michelle Dunaj on Tuesday / AP Photo/Ted S. Warren

SEATTLE A Michigan woman dying of leukemia says she hopes her embarrassment during a Seattle airport security pat-down might change the way the Transportation Security Administration treats travelers with medical conditions.

A TSA spokeswoman said late Tuesday, however, that the agency had reviewed video from the security checkpoint where Michelle Dunaj was screened for weapons and determined that the agency's procedures were followed.

Dunaj, 34, was making what she expects will be the last trip of her life on Oct. 2 as she traveled through Seattle en route to Hawaii.

The Roseville, Mich., woman thought she had prepared by calling the airline ahead of time, asking for a wheelchair, carrying documentation for her feeding tubes and making sure she had prescriptions for all her medications, including five bags of saline solution. But Dunaj said she received a full pat-down in the security line at Seattle-Tacoma Airport and had to lift her shirt and pull back bandages so agents could get a good look. She said everyone else in line got a look, too.

"My issue is: It was in front of everyone, and everyone was looking at me like I was a criminal or like I was doing something wrong," Dunaj told The Associated Press on Tuesday. "It shouldn't have been in front of everyone."

Dunaj said a female agent performed the pat-down and asked her to lift up her shirt after feeling the tubes going into Dunaj's chest and abdomen. Dunaj said her suggestion for a more private pat-down was dismissed.

"I asked them if they thought that was an appropriate location, and they told me that everything was fine," she said.

She said another agent punctured one of the saline bags she was carrying, ruining it.

"I didn't want to start getting upset and swearing and causing more of a scene or issue," Dunaj said. "But it definitely wasn't handled properly."

TSA said in a statement, "At no point did a TSA officer open the passenger's medically necessary liquids and the passenger was never asked to remove or pull off any bandages."

The agency also said "at any point, any passenger can request private screening with a witness present."

Asked to comment on Dunaj's statement that she had asked for a more private pat-down, TSA Northwest Region spokeswoman Lorie Dankers said, "I cannot address that" and added that the "statement stands on its own."

"We have determined that our screening procedures were followed," she said late Tuesday.

Dunaj said that after her pat-down, she was asked to move along, as if she were responsible for holding up the line.

"I thought that was a little rude," she said.

The TSA statement said "the passenger has not contacted TSA about her screening experience."

"We work to make our screening procedures as minimally invasive as possible while providing the level of security that the American people want and deserve," Dankers said in the statement.

Travelers with disabilities can call a TSA hotline with questions about screening procedures. The number is 855-787-2227.

Dunaj did not immediately return a call Tuesday evening seeking comment on the TSA's response.

She initially told her story on KOMO-TV.

She had no problems flying out of Detroit or returning to Seattle from Hawaii. She has been staying with a friend at suburban Bonney Lake in western Washington and planned to return to Michigan on Wednesday. She wasn't looking forward to departing from Sea-Tac, although the TSA contacted her through KOMO and offered to have a manager help her through security.

Her friend, Mary Rowe, said Tuesday evening the experience has "been exhausting for her."

"On the last trip of her life, she's been totally bombarded with everything," Rowe said.

Dunaj decided to make the trip after she was told she had three to four months to live. She doesn't regret it, despite the hassles.

"Hawaii was one of the most beautiful things I've ever seen," she said. "Number One on my bucket list."

She'll enter hospice back home Oct. 17.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
32 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
thefatcat2 says:
WE NEED MORE SECURITY NOT LESS OF IT.
If someone gets thru and causes Damage the news Media will
Make every excuse for them, and not any, for the victims.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MrsHippy says:
I want to make one more point. Anders Breivik could never have succeeded in killing 77 people if some of those people had been armed. Disarming the public actually made it possible for him to kill at will without reprisal. Now, how stupid is that? When you know that the people you are confronting have weapons you are less likely to use yours, and if you do use yours, you will face your equal. Right now, the person with a weapon has a greater advantage because most likely his rivals are unarmed. Stupid, stupid, stupid. It's time to get smart!
reply
PourpaixPourpaix replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yes, get smart like me. I go out armed to the teeth. Just last weekend, I spotted a suspicious character coming in through the exit in the movie theater. I immediately whipped out my Smith and Wesson, ordered all the civilians in the theater to the ground, and told the intruder to freeze or I'll start shooting.

As it turns out, it was just an usher making sure kids weren't sneaking in the back way. Of course, everyone in the theater thanked me profusely for my vigilance and preparedness, including the usher and movie theater owner. It could have gone so much worse.

It seems so obvious. The path to a more peaceful society means arming everyone, even children and grandmothers, and carefully instilling instincts to use the weapons when things seem wrong!
MrsHippy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
PourpaixPourpaix

Inventing a hypothetical to support your weak argument doesn't make your argument more valid!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MrsHippy says:
Millions of people are screened everyday, and none of them are terrorists. The TSA system is ridiculous, costly and unnecessary. The solution is simple. Allow people who have gone through a rigorous and thorough background check to carry weapons on a plane. Problem solved. Now if anyone one tries to misbehave on a plane there are plenty of people with weapons capable of taking them out. Disarming honest citizens means that only BAD PEOPLE have weapons. Completely Stupid!
reply
Lerianis4 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Agreed on all three points. We need to stop with this 'security' that is anything but and start just putting an armed air marshal on the planes or some of the planes at random.

If the terrorists have to worry about there being an armed air marshal on the plane, they won't try jack.
Montana5 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Hands down, you win....worst thought out idea of the year.
See all 6 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
VA_Jill says:
TSA agents are a bunch of ignorant, insensitive idiots. Of course you get what you pay for.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
djseavy says:
As I see it, the issue isn't whether they followed proper procedure, the issue the the procedure itself. The TSA needs to get it though their heads that all walks of life go through checkpoints, and accommodations must be made in situations like this. There was no justification whatsoever for this lady to have to expose herself in front of the general public. Had that been me, I would have stepped back and demanded to see a supervisor. That brings up another point. Don't wait until the last minute to go through the checkpoints, incase something comes up and you need assistance. Give yourself a couple of hours so that if you get into a problem, it can be resolved without you missing the flight.
reply
Lerianis4 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Better yet, let's just remove these procedures that are about the appearance of safety and not actual safety and move on.

The ONLY security improvement we needed after 9/11 was to strengthen the doors on the airplanes. We did that.

All the rest of this was giveaways to various private contractors.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lisachamp says:
Once again they have shown what a bunch of incompetent boobs they are. I think it's disgraceful how people are treated as a whole, but common sense is completely void when they deal with certain individuals, and they should be ashamed of themselves.
I've only flown twice since 9/11/01, and I don't intend to ever fly again. Partially, due to my claustrophobia, and partially because of the treatment we must endure.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
maxwittman says:
Can someone tell how many terrorist were secured at checkin since the harassment started? I take insulin and had a vile with me plus a syringe, you should have seen the inspector stare at me - I just stared back giving him a look that he was a schmuck. Will someone realize that the TSA and the current HiPA laws protect no one. All the government did is give ******** a job.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RebeccaLee63 says:
Strip searches? Such propaganda - you make me laugh! The TSA uses 2 types of machines, a back scatter and a millimeter wave. Most airports have BOTH machines and are replacing the back scatters with millimeter wave. You cannot see thru a persons clothing with a millimeter wave device. Please get your facts straight before postings such nonsense. Again, this is voluntary and you do have a choice of methods. If you chose neither, then there is always the good old fashioned hand pat down. check it out -

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-issues/1138014-complete-list-airports-whole-body-imaging-advanced-imaging-technology-scanner.html
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lillyhorton says:
TSA agrees that they should have taken her to a private area. They said this before, they say this now but they continue to make the same "mistake". Isn't TSA a government job? We the people pay their saleries am I not correct? Can we not fire them for situations like this? We give the US government money to run this country the way we want not the way they want. The only problem with this theory is when they run out of our money they make new money.
reply
zebra8835 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
This is the big part of TSA's problem. They are a pseudo-government jobs and pay about $11.00 an hour. Your barrister makes more money with their tips. It seems like there's usually around fifty of them milling around the machines. They'd be better off to have a dozen that were highly trained and better paid, around 35K-55K/Yr. or about the same as a sheriff's deputy. Eleven bucks an hour in New York, Chicago or San Fransisco, the turn over is too high to keep any body worth their salt.

You should be able to tell when a passenger is embarrassed and usher them to a private area quietly and professionally.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
talkin2u924 says:
The Problem with TSA is that they are in the News every other week. Regardless of right or wrong they need to modify how they do things to avoid even the perception that they are abusing power, embarrassing passengers and violating rights. It's a circus of a government operation and as the government goes it seems they do little or nothing to impact change. TSA has become a joke.
reply
RebeccaLee63 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Just how do think the TSA should be modified? The TSA agents are not mind readers. They cannot just look at someone and say they are OK. Everyone needs to be checked. If there are extenuating circumstances, those need to be checked as well. When you purchase a plane ticket you are submitting your self to this procedure. It's voluntary. All it took was a box cutter and a few plastic knives to take control of a plane on 9/11. Have you seen the video of a woman with a bomb under her shirt? She pulled a cord and blew herself and everyone around her up.
See all 32 Comments