CBS/AP/ September 28, 2012, 6:07 PM

U.S. intelligence: Understanding of Libya attack "evolving"

A man looks at documents at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, after an attack that killed four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, Wednesday, Sept. 12, 2012.

A man looks at documents at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, after an attack that killed four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, Wednesday, Sept. 12, 2012. / AP Photo/Ibrahim Alaguri

Updated

WASHINGTON U.S. intelligence officials sought to explain Friday why the Obama administration's understanding of the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is "evolving."

Facing a barrage of Republican criticism about what the administration knew and when about the attack, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued a statement Friday that laid out how officials came to understand the assault that killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans. At the same time, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations issued a statement explaining her early descriptions of the attack.

In the days immediately after the attack, the administration said it believed it was a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Islamic video that ridiculed Islam's Prophet Muhammad and ignited mob protests on U.S. embassies around the Middle East and in North Africa. Now, the administration has begun to call it a terrorist attack carried out by al Qaeda-linked militants and explain that it was a planned attack distinct from the mob protests in the region.

Republicans have seized on the Obama administration's changing narrative, saying the administration was too slow to label it a terrorist attack because, they said, the White House did not want to admit its policies had failed to defeat al Qaeda, and quell anti-American sentiment in the Muslim world.

On "CBS This Morning" Thursday Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said it was "incredible naivete" to think the violence was born because of the American-made anti-Muslim video. He said it was "the Islamists using the video" to incite violence.

McCain also called the response of the White House and State Department officials "unbelievable."

DNI spokesman Shawn Turner's statement said, "Throughout our investigation we continued to emphasize that information gathered was preliminary and evolving. . . .

"It remains unclear if any group or person exercised overall command and control of the attack, and if extremist group leaders directed their members to participate. However, we do assess that some of those involved were linked to groups affiliated with, or sympathetic to al Qaeda," he said.

At the same time, a spokeswoman for U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice also sought to explain comments that Rice made early in the investigation saying there was no evidence the Benghazi attack was premeditated.

"During her appearances on the Sunday talk shows Sept. 16, 2012, Ambassador Rice's comments were prefaced at every turn with a clear statement that an FBI investigation was under way that would provide the definitive accounting of the events that took place in Benghazi," said Erin Pelton, spokeswoman for the U.S. Mission to the United Nations. "At every turn Ambassador Rice provided -- and said she was providing -- the best information and the best assessment that the administration had at the time, based on what was provided to Ambassador Rice and other senior U.S. officials by the U.S. intelligence community."

Answering criticism from Republicans, Shawn Turner says officials thought the Libyan militants hijacked a similar protest in Benghazi, using the demonstration to launch an attack that killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

Turner's statement echoes that of Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who told reporters at a Pentagon news conference Thursday it took "a while" for White House staff to come to the conclusion that terrorists were behind the embassy assault. He was not more specific.

Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at the same press conference that prior to the attack there was some intelligence about security threats in Libya, but it was not specific to the U.S. Consulate.

Further intelligence may be slow to arrive. The FBI team that arrived in Libya last week to investigate the incident can't get to the scene of the attack because it is too dangerous, according to two law enforcement officials. The officials requested anonymity because they are not authorized to speak publicly about an ongoing investigation.

Republicans have seen the Libya attack as an opportunity to attack President Barack Obama on one of his strengths, foreign policy.

GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney accused the administration of being dishonest.

"I think it's pretty clear that they haven't wanted to level with the American people. We expect candor from the president and transparency," Romney told Fox News this week.

Recent intelligence reports indicated a force of more than 50 heavily armed extremists attacked the consulate, using gun trucks for added firepower, and establishing a perimeter to limit access to the compound and catch any Americans who might try to escape. A first wave of attacks set fire to the main building, forcing the Americans to flee to a fallback building a half mile away, where a second group of extremists attacked with mortar fire. Stevens died of apparent smoke inhalation when he was caught inside the main consulate building, becoming separated from the other fleeing diplomats.

Intelligence officials have focused their attention on Ansar al-Shariah, a Libyan militant group led by a former detainee at the U.S. military-run prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
35 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ForMidnight says:
Evolving? Uh, no. Obama and his ambassador to the U.N. lied through their teeth about this planned attack, and every American knew exactly what was going on.
Obama is the biggest B.S. artist on the scene today.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jdbynum3 says:
We need to bring all our troops home and line our borders with them and dare any s.o.b. to look at us in a threatning manner. I, for one, am tired of fussing with other countrys and trying not to offend them. That, in it's self, offends ME. If anyone doesn't like it, they can leave also.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jdbynum3 says:
Bunch of fools. I don't know what else to say.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MidRoadAlone says:
The headline says it all. This administration had no clue as to what was about to happen and could not understand it after it did.
Our intelligence capabilities are dropping back to what they were under Clinton, when terrorists not only came to this country, but got their flight training here with no one the wiser. Clinton had devastated the human on the ground element of intelligence gathering and we paid the price, Bush could not put that back in place during his first nine months in office. (by the way, Bush also inherited a recession from Clinton).
Hopefully, we don't fall back to the level of incompetence we saw under the Carter years. I was still in the army when the failed hostage rescue took place - none of us were surprised at the equipment failures that lead to so many deaths - Carter had gutted the military and we had nothing to train with.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
no1cares4u2 says:
to swm1143: YOu keep saying this is nothing. Tell that to the family members of the four Americans that died in this attack, terrorist or not. How come when it is Obama and company, the truth doesn't matter? Be honest, you dupa, if this had been Bush, you and the news media would have been asking for his head on a platter. What hypocrits the liberal masses are.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Well_You_Aint_Me says:
"Republicans have seized on the Obama administration's changing narrative, saying the administration was too slow to label it a terrorist attack because, they said, the White House did not want to admit its policies had failed to defeat al Qaeda, and quell anti-American sentiment in the Muslim world."

Meanwhile the GOPers wanted to just start another war, this time in Libya, without even knowing who the enemy is, just bomb Libya back past the discovery of fire.


=================================

"...administration ... policies had failed to defeat al Qaeda."


Good luck with that, assuming the GOPers intend to completely wipe out AQ, not likely to happen they will come back just under another name.


===========================

"...quell anti-American sentiment in the Muslim world."


Yeah, not going to happen as long as America stands in support of Israel.

Just dumb stuff there.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kevcl6750 says:
CBS is just part of the obama Spin Cycle ! Evolving ??? How dumb do they think we are ? Anyone with half a brain would know what the deal was in Libya ! It happened on 9/11 McFly! Heavy weapons , etc etc. ! Like John Lennon wrote : " keep you doped with religion , sex, and TV!!! Thank you CBS, you guys are part of the problem !
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CTsherman1955 says:
The problem with this inept regime is that it quickly wanted to brand this as a "spontaneous demonstration" as a result of a video. Had this truly been a situation where "facts were evolving" the regime should have admitted up front that we "don't know" and are "investigating". That would have been appropriate. But, when the regime went out of its way to insist that this was caused by a video --- a narrative that fit nicely the Obama re-election mantra--- that is where the deception and dishonesty crept into the story. I believe that the Obama regime deliberably mislead us in America to allow the story to "die down" so as to not affect Obama's treks across the country with his fundraisers and campaigning --- kinda a "bump along the way". I believe the Obama misled the world community to show his disdain to the inconvenient first amendment in America and to allow him to reaffirm his "apologetic" (and indeed pathetic) foreign policy. And where was the major news outlets. . . continuing their perfect impression of the old Pravda and Tass news agency impersonations from the 1960's and 1970's era.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nov6 says:
The never ending lying must stop. The FBI cant get to the compound but a reporter was there and found the ambassador journal days after the attack. The Libyan president has been saying for week it was terrorist attacks and has been reports of 48 notice of the the attacks the U.S. administration ignored. Stop the lies tell the truth especially CBS news and the rest of the MSM media that helping Obama cover this up.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bbinfla says:
The republican party is pathetically desperate.
reply
swm1143 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Amen... trying to make an issue out of nothing...
See all 35 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right