AP/ September 28, 2012, 5:41 AM

Postal Service on brink of second $5B default

Getty Images

WASHINGTON The U.S. Postal Service, on the brink of default on a second multi-billion-dollar payment it can't afford to pay, is sounding a new cautionary note that, having squeezed out all the cost savings within its power, the mail agency's viability now lies almost entirely with Congress.

In an interview, Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe said the mail agency will be forced to miss the $5.6 billion payment due to the Treasury on Sunday, its second default in as many months. Congress has left Washington until after the November elections, without approving a postal fix.

For more than a year, the Postal Service has been seeking legislation that would allow it to eliminate Saturday mail delivery and reduce its $5 billion annual payment for future retiree health benefits. Since the House failed to act, the post office says it's been seeking to reassure anxious customers that service will not be disrupted, even with cash levels running perilously low.

"Absolutely, we would be profitable right now," Donahoe told The Associated Press, when asked whether congressional delays were to blame for much of the postal losses, expected to reach a record $15 billion this year.

He said the two missed payments -- totaling $11.1 billion for future retiree health benefits — payments ordered by Congress in 2006 that no other government agency or business is required to make — along with similar expenses, make up the bulk of the annual loss. The remainder is nearly $3 billion in losses, he said, which would have been offset by savings if the service had been allowed to move to five-day mail delivery.

Donahoe said the post office will hit a low point in cash next month but avert immediate bankruptcy due to a series of retirement incentives, employee reductions and boosts in productivity among remaining staff that saved nearly $2 billion over the past year.

But the post office has few tools left to build its revenue, he said, without either having to pay upfront money it lacks or get approval from postal unions or Congress.

"We've done a lot to reduce cost out of our system," Donahoe said. "The problem now is this: There's nowhere to go."

Play Video

More junk mail on the way?

Postal unions also say Congress is mostly to blame for losses, but disagree that a reduction to five-day delivery is an answer.

"What is needed is for Congress to undo the harm it has done with the prefunding mandate and for the Postal Service to develop a balanced plan moving forward," said Fredric Rolando, president of the National Association of Letter Carriers. He said cutting Saturday delivery would in particular hurt rural residents and the elderly who depend more heavily on the mail for prescription drugs and other goods.

The Postal Service last month failed to pay $5.5 billion, its first default ever on a payment. While it will miss a second payment Sunday, it expects to make a $1.4 billion payment due to the Labor Department on Oct. 15 for workers' compensation. Cash levels are expected to hit a low after that labor payment before rising again due to increased volume from holiday and election mail, including ballots for early voting.

The mail agency said the two payment defaults will not affect day-to-day operations. Post offices will stay open, and suppliers and employees will get paid. Longer term, however, Donahoe has cautioned that a "crisis of confidence" over postal solvency could damage growth.

The post office also remains vulnerable to shifts in the economy that could suppress mail volume. Both FedEx Corp. and UPS recently have cut their earnings forecasts, citing in part slow global economic growth.

"The key thing is Congress must act during the lame-duck session and get this whole thing behind us," said Donahoe, referring to the few weeks lawmakers will be in session after the election before a new Congress takes office in January. "We can't have a Postal Service where customers are constantly worried about our ability to make payments."

"That's no way to run a business," he said.

Congress will have a full agenda of pressing fiscal issues when it returns in November, and some lawmakers have raised the possibility that postal legislation will get pushed over to the next Congress. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., who chairs the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and is a sponsor of the House bill, has said he believes some kind of legislation can be passed in the lame-duck session, although it may not be as comprehensive as initially sought.

The Senate passed a postal bill in April that would have provided financial relief in part by reducing the annual health payments and providing an $11 billion cash infusion, basically a refund of overpayments the Postal Service made to a federal pension fund. The House, however, remains stalled over a separate bill that would allow for aggressive cuts, including an immediate end to Saturday delivery. Rural lawmakers in particular worry about the impact of post office closures in their communities.

The Postal Service originally planned to close low-revenue post offices in rural areas to save money, but after public opposition it now is moving forward with a new plan to keep 13,000 of them open with shorter operating hours. The Postal Service also will begin closing more than 200 mail processing centers next year, but the estimated annual savings of $2.1 billion won't be realized until the full cuts are completed in late 2014.

"Once again, we are watching the days slip away before the U.S. Postal Service faces the second default of its history. Republican leaders in the House of Representatives have now had 11 months to do the right thing and fix the serious, but solvable, financial challenges," said Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., a co-sponsor of the Senate bill. "Every day Congress delays fixing this problem, the financial challenge grows more difficult and the potential solutions become more expensive."

The Postal Service, an independent agency of government, does not receive tax dollars for its day-to-day operations but is subject to congressional control.

Art Sackler, co-coordinator of the Coalition for a 21st Century Postal Service, a group representing the private-sector mailing industry, said many businesses are preparing their budgets for next year and have no idea whether to expect disrupted service or higher postage costs.

"Congress needs to act quickly on comprehensive postal reform," he said. "These defaults, mounting debts and declining revenues aren't just going to hurt the Postal Service; they're going to hurt the 8 million Americans whose jobs depend on the mail."

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
40 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
unclebernies says:
The republicans in congress have put an absurd burden on the postal service. Three years ago they passed a law for them to fund 5 billion a year toward their retirement fund. No company in private sector would ever ask of such a demand. It's obvious they are trying to force the postal service into failure. Your 39 cent stamp will get a whole lot higher if they have their way.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Phil_Eng_Amer says:
It seems the best course of action for unions would be to move away from union and public sector thinking. The writing has been on the wall, as net income and volume have mail have steadily declined (http://chi.mg/oBezLD), but it's clear a lot needs fixing. It may be time for the USPS to embrace private sector business theory. Government regulation is doing it no favors, and unless it can adapt, more layoffs seem to be the only way to account for faulty business model. It's sad to see such misfortune befall the USPS, but solutions are there if they can embrace innovation.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CuriousServant says:
This is about Reagan! He changed the way the post office runs, which started to encourage bulk mailing and failing profits. It wasn't supposed to a for profit, it was supposed to foster communication and commerce.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lesserof2evil says:
Where is con man Ryan's plan to privatize the Post Office?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gerhardiii says:
Let me add that I'm a retired Postal Worker..and Postal Management and employees in General are lazy, incompetent....and create their own problems..

Wasted union settlements because management repeats the same old wrongs...

Even after retirement they took 18 months to execute a Court Order and screwed it up..to where by their own negligence and incompetence they have to take 8 more months to rectify it I was told.. They sent 8,000 lump sum incorrectly and need 8 months to fix it... Surprise! Yes their hands are tied with Congressional regulations..but it wouldn't matter!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
seeingisbelieving82 says:
I know a mail personally know a mail sorter, she is so overpaid, doing an entry level job, she make a salary comparable to people with masters and bachelors degrees. Also the workers don't have to pay into their own retirement. It's entirely covered by the government. I work for a state agency and have to pay a hefty portion (11.65%) of my salary into my retirement plan.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jtdev1 says:
This is an entirely manufactured crisis caused by congress.

It was, after all, Congress that pass legislation forcing the post office to pay "FUTURE" retiree's benefits up front (yes, before they are due) to the tune of 5 Billion.


Congress wants to privatize the post offices and by making them default, they will get the chance to "Outsource" it to a private company and then we'll all see the price of limited services skyrocket.
reply
facelessdrone2005 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Don't talk to me about Post Office "ineptitude" when 50% of my mail is private organizations soliciting contributions (they get to mail direct to me for 5 cents) and 40% of my mail is corporate advertising that is delivered for almost nothing. It wasn't Post Office ineptitude that set those ridiculous rates, it was CONGRESS. And BTW most of the requests for contributions come from Republican hypocrites like you.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
baileycccc says:
Things are not clear. The Postmaster General said he mailed the check 2 weeks ago and the Treasury Secretary says it has not arrived. Maybe this is what is wrong with the post office.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
eroteme2 says:
I wonder what Donahoe's salary/benefits total to. Also wonder if he might want to look into operations by UPS and FEDEX. Maybe he could pick up couple of clues.
reply
RetiredArmy_Nurse replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I think he's pretty well paid, but then he is head of this huge operation. I was well paid in the Army, and still well paid in retirement. With responsibility comes compensation. I've offered corrections to a lot of previous posts here and will do the same for you. Donahoe's salary has little to do with USPS insolency. The problem was caused by a repug congress that mandated it fund its retirement system for 75 years--a totally irresponsible decision designed to destroy this valuable public service. Here is another correction...USPS USES NO TAXPAYER DOLLARS in their every day expenses. Without that 75 year pension requirement, they would be one of the most profitable enterprises in the country. It amazes me how many posters yap here, but have no clue what they are talking about.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
NB62 says:
In a way its kind of sad that another piece of American history such as the USPS is slowly being relagated to history books.Sometimes progress isnt such a good thing.
reply
RetiredArmy_Nurse replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
True, the postal service has served us since the days of the Pony Express. To destroy USPS is not progress, it is destruction of the fabric of our society.
See all 40 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right