AP/ September 27, 2012, 4:20 PM

More than a third fear drone use in U.S.: Poll

This September 2011 photo provided by Vanguard Defense Industries, shows a ShadowHawk drone with Montgomery County, Texas, SWAT team members.

This September 2011 photo provided by Vanguard Defense Industries, shows a ShadowHawk drone with Montgomery County, Texas, SWAT team members. / Vanguard Defense Industries,AP Photo/Lance Bertolino

(AP) WASHINGTON - More than a third of Americans worry their privacy will suffer if drones like those used to spy on U.S. enemies overseas become the latest police tool for tracking suspected criminals at home, according to an Associated Press-National Constitution Center poll.

Congress has directed the Federal Aviation Administration to come up with safety regulations that will clear the way for routine domestic use of unmanned aircraft within the next three years. The government is under pressure from a wide range of interests to open U.S. skies to drones. Oil companies want them to monitor pipelines. Environmentalists want them to count sea lions on remote islands. Farmers want them to fly over crops with sensors that can detect which fields are wet and which need watering. They're already being used to help fight forest fires. And the list goes on.

Manufacturers are also keen to cash in on what they expect to be a burgeoning new drone market. Government and commercial drone-related expenditures are forecast to total $89 billion worldwide over the next decade. On the leading edge of that new market are state and local police departments, who say that in many cases drones are cheaper, more practical and more effective than manned aircraft. Most of them would be small drones, generally weighing less than 55 pounds. They could be used, for example, to search for missing children or to scout a location ahead of a SWAT team.

New use for drones: Sports photography
Drones have U.S. lawmakers worried over privacy
Drone "hijackings" in U.S. raise security concerns

But privacy advocates caution that drones equipped with powerful cameras, including the latest infrared cameras that can "see" through walls, listening devices and other information-gathering technology raise the specter of a surveillance society in which the activities of ordinary citizens are monitored and recorded by the authorities.

Nearly half the public, 44 percent, supports allowing police forces inside the U.S. to use drones to assist police work, but a significant minority - 36 percent - say they "strongly oppose" or "somewhat oppose" police use of drones, according to a survey last month.

When asked if they were concerned that police departments' use of drones for surveillance might cause them to lose privacy, 35 percent of respondents said they were "extremely concerned" or "very concerned." An almost identical share, 36 percent, said they were "not too concerned" or "not concerned at all."

Twenty-four percent fell in the middle, saying they were "somewhat concerned" about a potential loss of personal privacy.

David Eisner, president and CEO of the constitution center in Philadelphia, said he was surprised by the level of support for police use of drones.

"I had assumed that the idea that American police would be using the same technology that our military is using in Afghanistan would garner an almost hysterical response," Eisner said. Support for drone use "shows that people are feeling less physically secure than they'd like to because they are willing to accept fairly extreme police action to improve that security."

There was a gender gap in the poll, with men were more concerned about a loss of privacy if police start using drones than women - 40 percent to 30 percent. There was an even wider gap between white and black respondents, with 48 percent of blacks strongly concerned about a loss of privacy compared to 32 percent of whites.

But the poll found no significant difference between Democrats and Republicans on the issue.

Protecting privacy has long been an issue that resonates on both the political left and the right, said Jay Stanley, an American Civil Liberties Union senior policy analyst. He pointed to several bills that were introduced this year in Congress by Democratic and Republican lawmakers to prevent drones from being used in a manner that jeopardizes privacy.

"The awareness of drones and their privacy implications has really reached the American public," Stanley said. "This is a technology that people weren't thinking about at all or hadn't heard much about at all just a couple of years ago."

Responding to public concern, a drone industry trade group and the International Association of Police Chiefs have separately released voluntary guidelines for drone use in recent months.

"A lot of the public doesn't understand how the technology is being used," said Gretchen West, vice president of the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International. "Law enforcement use (drones) to do the same thing they've used manned aircraft for years, it's just that (drones) are more affordable and usually a more efficient option."

The National Constitution Center is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that operates a Philadelphia museum and other educational programs about the Constitution.

The AP-NCC Poll was conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs & Corporate Communications from Aug. 16-20, using landline and cellphone interviews with 1,006 randomly chosen adults. The margin of sampling error was plus or minus 3.9 percentage points.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
24 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jhihmoac says:
It's when they get to be the size and shape of dragonflies is when you start wondering...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wizardlady says:
WHAT IS COMING NEXT??????
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
johnlockesghost says:
"...Oil companies want them to monitor pipelines. Environmentalists want them to count sea lions on remote islands. Farmers want them to fly over crops with sensors that can detect which fields are wet and which need watering. They're already being used to help fight forest fires. And the list goes on."---Fine and good, but they should not be used by police and any evidence that they are doing so should be a violation. We do not need a police state!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gwrigley says:
My concern is eventually they will begin to use drones with weapons mounted on them claiming it will save the lives of police officers. The problem will be the same as in Pakistan, where innocent civilians are often mistaken for terrorists.
reply
PatriotWatchdog replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
@Gwrigley, The problem you express as "eventually" is NOW. Congress has already authorized the usurpation / evisceration of over half of the Bill of Rights with the 2012 NDAA. President Obama already assassinated U.S. Citizens without due process, without charge, without trial, without access to an attorney, without the Constitutionally-guaranteed right to confront one's accusers.

"...innocent civilians are often mistaken for terrorists?" Under the Constitution, ALL are innocent until proven guilty. Drones with weapons have no place over American skies.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tryhonesty says:
How about concern for AIRSPACE SAFETY. I do not want to fly on airlines with all of these drones filling the skies. Just wait until the first airliner crashes due to a drone midair...SAFETY, SAFETY SAFETY FIRST!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tsigili says:
There already is no privacy. This government is monitoring hundreds of people on line, at any given moment.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
IAMCS says:
Does this mean I have to get dressed before noon?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
truthforhumanity says:
"The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress."
- Frederick Douglass, civil rights activist, Aug. 4, 1857

Translation: The level of tyranny a government will inflict upon the population is equal to the amount of tyranny people are willing to accept.

If you don't think giving the "authorities" drones for domestic law enforcement, then stand up and protest it. Doing nothing is giving a green light to government to do whatever they want. Wake up or enjoy being a zombie.
reply
truthforhumanity replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If you don't think giving the "authorities" drones for domestic law enforcement is a good idea, ... (correction)
linkicon reporticon emailicon
arkajun-2009 says:
The politicians (republican and democrat)have conspired and taken the Dept of Homeland Security and turned it into the Gestapo.

Beware America, they're coming for YOU!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
murkymook says:
Nice picture of the SS.
reply
See all 24 Comments