Mass. officials to fight murderer's sex change

Michelle Kosilek, in an undated image / CBS/WBZ (file image)
(AP) BOSTON - Massachusetts officials have decided to appeal a judge's decision to grant a convicted murderer's request for sex-reassignment surgery.
A Patrick administration official confirmed the decision to The Associated Press Wednesday on the condition of anonymity because an official announcement had yet to be made.
Kosilek's attorney said she had no immediate comment because she didn't know of the appeal.
U.S. District Judge Mark Wolf ruled the surgery is the only adequate treatment for Michelle Kosilek's gender-identity disorder, a condition he said is a "serious medical need." It was the first time a judge ordered prison officials to provide sex-reassignment surgery to an inmate.
"Michelle" Kosilek
/ AP PhotoWolf's ruling prompted an outcry among some legislative leaders, who say Kosilek isn't entitled to the taxpayer-funded surgery
Kosilek was named Robert when married to Cheryl Kosilek and was convicted of her 1990 murder.
Mass. inmate sex-change ruling praised, condemned
Judge orders inmate's taxpayer-funded sex change
Transgender Killer Tells Massachusetts Taxpayers to Put Mammogram on Her Tab
Popular on CBSNews.com
-
Photos: Underground shots of NYC's Second Ave. subway project New York City's Second Ave. subway was first conceived almost a century ago and when it is completed, it will extend all the way down the eastern side of Manhattan with 16 new stations. CBS News' Don Dahler reports on one of the most challenging public works projects in the country.
- Reporter Michael Hastings dies at 33
- Google asks FISA court to lift gag order on NSA requests
- Girl who lost feet in lawnmower gets prosthetics
- Tornado briefly touches down on Denver airport runways
- FAA approval sought for 650-foot-tall Vegas thrill ride
- Report: U.S. teacher training an "industry of mediocrity"
- Scientists say shipwreck timber in Lake Michigan centuries old
- Report: Pregnant workers face routine discrimination














The answer should be an obvious - No
Have we lost our minds?
However, he has no right to have it at taxpayer expense.
Nobody "on the outside" gets this surgery paid for by taxpayers.