AP/ September 25, 2012, 4:47 AM

Micro-apartments could get big San Francisco boost

Artist's concept released by Panoramic Interests shows 300 square-foot apartment proposed for San Francisco. City may allow units as small as 220 square feet.

Artist's concept released by Panoramic Interests shows 300 square-foot apartment proposed for San Francisco. City may allow units as small as 220 square feet. / AP Photo/Panoramic Interests

(AP) SAN FRANCISCO — San Francisco may soon give new meaning to the word "downsizing."

Supervisors are set to vote Tuesday on a proposed change to the city's building code that would allow construction of among the tiniest apartments in the country.

Under the plan, new apartments could be as small as 220 square feet (a little more than double the size of some prison cells), including a kitchen, bathroom and closet, the Los Angeles Times reports.

Current regulations require the living room alone to be that size.

Schematics for 300-square-foot units planned for San Francisco's South of Market neighborhood include window seats that turn into spare beds and beds that turn into tables.

Proponents say the smaller apartments would provide a cheaper option for the city's many single residents, who have been priced out of the rental market as the region experiences a resurgent technology industry.

San Francisco apartments rented for an average of $2,734 in June, up 13 percent from a year ago, according to the research firm, RealFacts.

The micro-units, in contrast, are expected to rent for $1,200 to $1,500 a month, San Francisco Supervisor Scott Wiener told the Los Angeles Times. Wiener drafted the legislation for the smaller apartments.

It allows them to accommodate up to two people and requires an additional 100 square feet of space for each occupant above that number.

"Although in our fantasy world, everyone would live in a single-family home or a huge spacious flat, the reality of life is that not everyone can afford that," Wiener said.

But critics counter that the units wouldn't help families and could boost population density, straining public transit and other city services.

"This has to be a pilot project and allow for further study before we end up like Singapore," said Sara Shortt, executive director of the tenants' rights group, Human Rights Committee of San Francisco.

Singapore authorities recently raised minimum dwelling sizes because of concerns about congestion. Some critics want San Francisco to follow the example of New York City and first test a small number of the units. New York City's micro-units also have a higher minimum-size requirement.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
26 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Bojax39 says:
"Although in our fantasy world, everyone would live in a single-family home or a huge spacious flat, the reality of life is that not everyone can afford that," Wiener said.

But they can afford $1,500 a month for a closet?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hypnotoad72 says:
That much money for such a tin can for innocent people in a free country?

I'm not an advocate for "mcmansions", but this is the other extreme...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
counters-trike says:
Downsizing "worked" very well for me- I was literally forced out of a condo for a 3 year complex rebuild into a dinky efficiency apartment. Although I am 60 years old this 'dorm-room-existance' (but yes- my micro-unit has a fair sized bathroom) has given me a lot more freedom than I had in the large condo. Being 1 block away from he ocean 75 miles south of San Francisco saves a few dollars, but rent is high here due to the tourist-trap atmosphere. So far the advantages have been well worth moving here.
reply
hypnotoad72 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
What may work for you may not work for others, but I too live in a not-big place and have no qualms with it... apart from some uncouth neighbors, but they can be found anywhere...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nomorelibs says:
Holy S. $1200-$1500/mo for that. I can see how a single person could live in such a small space. If I were young and single it would be ideal. But what single person can afford that high rent. Is minimum wage in San Fran $20/hr?
reply
hypnotoad72 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Your pseudonym may be distasteful, but I agree with you on the content of your post.

We want low low wages but we don't want low low costs. Especially as that disconnect has allowed some to profit(eer) at the expense of others. A stable economic paradigm would hurt those who are doing the profiteering...

But it's "supply and demand"... no point mewling about "costs" such as "wages"... this is the system people want... why complain?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
john92021 says:
Just a change of name from SRO to apartment. Got to have these termite nests for the workers. They are always complaining they don't have enough service workers willing to work for nothing. Weather's not good enough to live outside, parking is at a premium so no sleeping in your car and commute is too expensive to make it worthwhile. Pretty soon they will be hot bunking it. How is this not slavery? There is a point where life is not worth living.
reply
hypnotoad72 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Sadly true...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
samIam4u2 says:
Wouldnt it be easier to deal with population/housing concerns to simply lower the quotas from countries whose citiens are known to create extra-large families by having ten children at a whack? I think if we have come as a nation to building 300 square foot apartments, it is time to realize that we are running out of space and need to do something about that.
reply
hypnotoad72 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I concur.

There is far more to life than just the purported number of customers in a country solely because of raw population numbers... there are MANY factors, but marketers only want the number of theoretical customers...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kroguej says:
Wait I thought grater population density that relies on subways/buses results in less congestion than the suburbia model. It seems to me its kind of a cool concept for single early 20's types who are always on the go anyways.
reply
hypnotoad72 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
it is the new normal - homes, families, community, and society seem to be a nostalgic thing of the past... but that's what people want, even if they are told that is what they want...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mtb3333 says:
I truly have always loved California, used to dream about living there. But 1200 a month for a closet to live in? I think I'll stay in Michigan, winter and all, where the house is paid for, the living is cheap, and one can relax gracefully without having to work 80 hours a week to barely afford necessities. Love San Francisco, but it , and New York, have priced themselves out of a safe haven for creative artists and wanderers and seem to have become gentrified hipstervilles. No thanks.
reply
kroguej replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yup, the cost of living in a decent neighborhood chased me out of California.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jon_MD says:
"THE RENTS TOO DAMN HIGH!"
reply
kroguej replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lol
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SummersideKate says:
Let's see, 220 sq. ft. is a 20'x11' room, roughly. For that they want $1200-$1500 a month? I've lived in college dorm rooms that were more spacious and cost less! Not for the claustrophobic, or anyone who wants to feel like they're getting their money's worth.
reply
matt6052 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
A dorm room doesn't have a private bath and kitchen. Apartment shown has kitchen that is too big.
See all 26 Comments