Appeals absolve Army Corps over Katrina liability

A cross honoring those killed by Hurricane Katrina stands in the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet in St. Bernard Parish November 27, 2009, in Shell Beach, Louisiana. / Getty Images

(AP) NEW ORLEANS - A federal appeals court reversed itself Monday and threw out a judge's landmark ruling that the Army Corps of Engineers was liable for billions of dollars in Hurricane Katrina flood damage that property owners blame on the corps' maintenance of a New Orleans shipping channel.

The same three-judge panel from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that sided with plaintiffs earlier this year withdrew that decision and replaced it with a new ruling in the federal government's favor.

The panel's new opinion says the corps is completely insulated from liability by a provision of the Federal Tort Claims Act called the "discretionary-function exception."

In 2009, U.S. District Judge Stanwood Duval Jr. rejected the federal government's argument that it is entitled to immunity from lawsuits blaming Katrina's flood damage on the corps' operation and maintenance of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet navigation channel.

Plaintiffs' attorneys argued that the corps' delay in armoring the channel was the result of erroneous scientific judgments, not public-policy considerations that would make it immune to the homeowners' claims.

Some blame NOLA levees for rural floods
Can Mayor Mitch Landrieu reinvent New Orleans?
Harry Shearer: New Orleans flooding was not a natural disaster

But the 5th Circuit panel disagreed, saying there was ample evidence that decisions leading to the corps' delay in armoring the channel had a "public policy character."

"Although the Corps appears to have appreciated the benefit of foreshore protection as early as 1967, the record shows that it also had reason to consider alternatives (such as dredging and levee 'lifts') and feasibility before committing to an armoring strategy that, in hindsight, may well have been optimal," the panel wrote in its new opinion.

Joseph Bruno, one of the lead plaintiffs' attorneys for the case, accused the panel of essentially giving the corps a "get out of jail free card." He said the lead plaintiffs' attorneys on the case would weigh their options, which include asking the full 5th Circuit to rehear the case.

"It's heartbreaking for the people of our city," he said.

Bruno said Monday's ruling has no bearing on a trial that started earlier this month for separate but related claims that excavation work by a corps contractor weakened New Orleans floodwalls and caused them to breach in two places during the 2005 storm. Duval also is hearing testimony in the case without a jury.

Duval had awarded a total of nearly $720,000 in damages to five plaintiffs who sued the corps over the shipping channel claims. The corps also has received roughly 500,000 administrative claims that could become fodder for similar suits.

The shipping channel, which extends for 60 miles (100 kilometers) southeast from New Orleans to the Gulf of Mexico, partially opened in 1963 and was closed about three years after Katrina struck in August 2005. Over the decades, the corps' dredging of the channel resulted in the loss of thousands of acres (hectares) of wetlands that helped protect greater New Orleans from hurricane flood waters.

[4easter]

How come CBS is not lynching Obama over this ruling?!? If George Bush caused the hurricane shouldn't the standing President be held liable for the federal court's reversal???

[kat-wonders]

There is always 2 sides to every story. We seem to only ever get one side.

[KansasCity-2012]

I watched the State of Louisiana fail to raise the drinking age to comply with a federal mandate and lose their federal highway dollars that were used for interstate highway projects under maintenance and construction at the time. The State then re-appropriated federal levy project funding dollars to finish their highway projects in progress at the time. Without the levy fortification dollars, they were left to deteriorate and fail under the forces of prolonged flood waters from Katrina.

The State of Louisiana was the real culprit for their failure to legislate as most other states did to raise the drinking age to 21.
If they had, there would have been no lapse in federal highway funding dollars. The State of Louisiana prohibits earmarking federal dollars for specific projects, which made re-appropriation possible and fatal for post Katrina flood waters.

[sjc_1]

Bush is liable, the Army Corp told him years before Katrina that upgrades needed to be made, he said NO.