AP/ September 24, 2012, 6:08 PM

Amtrak testing new high speed rail service along Northeast Corridor

(AP) TRENTON, N.J. - Amtrak is going to break the speed limit in the Northeast Corridor.

The rail service announced Monday it will operate test trains overnight at 165 mph in four stretches from Maryland to Massachusetts.

Acela Express equipment will be used for the tests, which were to start at about 10:30 p.m. Monday in New Jersey and will continue into next week, Amtrak spokesman Cliff Cole said.

All the locations may one day have regular 160 mph service; the current top speed limit is 150 mph.

Amtrak said tests need to be performed at 5 mph above what is expected to be the maximum operating speed.

Two test locations - from Perryville, Md., to Wilmington, Del., and from Trenton to New Brunswick, N.J. - currently have a speed limit of 135 mph. The two others - in Rhode Island from Westerly to Cranston and in Massachusetts from South Attleboro to Readville - have 150 mph limits.

The same areas, totaling just over 100 miles, were used for tests reaching 165 mph in the 1990s before the introduction of high-speed Acela service, Cole said. Federal regulations required another round of testing, he said, to further raise the top speed limit.

Cole said the tests, with cars equipped with instruments to collect a variety of data, will not affect normal rail operations because they are scheduled at a time of minimal rail service.

In New Jersey, track, electric power, signals and other systems are to be upgraded over the next several years to improve reliability and to permit regular train operations at faster speeds, as part of a $450 million project funded by the federal high-speed rail program.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
7 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sjc_1 says:
I read people talking about how we don't have the trains that other countries have, how we should, but I never hear how we are going to pay for that. Tax is such a dirty word to them.
reply
jaykay3141 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
They'd rather pay $4 a gallon for gas and burn it sitting in traffic jams than shell out a few extra bucks for rail service.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jhihmoac says:
On existing lines? Uhh-Ohh....
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ghostwriter--2008 says:
Amtrak is a joke. Even at 165 mph these will be slow-poke trains compared to high speed rail in just about any European or Asian country. Pathetic.
reply
jaykay3141 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The difference is that those countries view rail as an important part of a multi-modal transportation system instead of the poor stepchild of roads and highways. If the latter two were funded the same politicized, skinflint way Amtrak is you couldn't drive 10 miles without breaking a shock absorber and airlines would still be flying DC-7s.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ralphing says:
Those Amtrak trains can't stay on the tracks at normal speeds without derailing or hitting a car or truck sitting on the tracks, so upping the speeds will be a disaster. Literally.
reply
jaykay3141 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Proof? Sources? How many accidents has Amtrak had per passenger-mile compared to cars?