CBS/AP/ September 18, 2012, 5:34 AM

Chicago teachers to vote on offer to end strike

Updated at 11:10 a.m. ET

(CBS/AP) CHICAGO - Teachers in the nation's third-largest city will pore over the details of a contract settlement Tuesday as the clock ticks down to an afternoon meeting in which they are expected to vote on whether to end a seven-day strike that has kept 350,000 students out of class.

Some union delegates planned to take a straw poll of rank-and-file teachers to measure support for a settlement that includes pay raises and concessions from the city on the contentious issues of teacher evaluations and job security. But many warned the outcome remained uncertain two days after delegates refused to call off the walkout, saying they didn't trust city and school officials and wanted more details.

"It takes a lot to start a strike. You don't want to prematurely end it," said Jay Rehak, an English teacher and union delegate who planned to survey his colleagues at Whitney M. Young Magnet High School before voting at a meeting scheduled for 3 p.m.

It will take a simple majority out of more than 700 delegates to end the strike, CBS Chicago station WBBM-TV reports.

Karen Lewis, the president of the Chicago Teachers Union, told WBEZ Radio that she didn't expect a quick decision, saying that teachers still have a lot of questions. She said it's going to take a while for some delegates to feel comfortable with the provisions of the proposed settlement.

As parental support for the strike waned, teachers came under pressure to quickly decide on the tentative contract that labor and education experts — and even some union leaders — called a good deal for the union.

With temperatures dipping into the 40s Tuesday morning, a few dozen teachers gathered outside the Goethe Elementary School in Logan Square, a neighborhood in the west of the city.

Heath Davis, a seventh-grade science teacher, said he was optimistic that a vote Tuesday could end the teachers' first strike in 25 years, although concerns about the academic calendar, pensions and resources for special education have yet to be resolved.

"We don't want to move too quickly," said Davis, who is a member of the Chicago Teachers Union's House of Delegates. "We want to make sure our questions are answered,"

He said everyone is keen to return to the classroom.

"I'm desperately wanting to get back to my lab experiments with my kids," Davis said.

Irked by the union's two-day delay in voting on whether to send children back to school, Mayor Rahm Emanuel took the matter into court Monday. A judge has called a hearing for Wednesday morning to rule on the city's request for an injunction ordering the teachers back to work.

Members of at least one new parent group expressed frustrations that their children could not return to class after the teachers decided to stay out on Sunday.

"I was very disappointed," said Erica Weiss, who has been dropping off her 6-year-old daughter at a district-organized program each day but has to arrange for someone else to pick her up. She initially supported the strike, but more than a week was unnecessary, she said.

On Monday, teachers' picket lines appeared smaller and a passing jogger booed the teachers picketing at Mark T. Skinner West Elementary School on the near West Side.

"It's risky to extend the strike when everyone was expecting the strike to be over," said Richard Kahlenberg of the Century Foundation, a nonpartisan think tank in Washington.

Among the pending questions was whether Emanuel's lawsuit would stir up more trouble.

"If he wants teachers back in the schools, he should have stayed away from that type of action," Rehak said. "It only incites."

A labor law expert told WBBM-TV the mayor's choice to take the case to court was risky.

"This does not bode well. This is a bad thing. It's not good in the long term for resolving a dispute amicably. We all, Chicagoans, all have a vested interest in having this dispute being resolved in a way that is good and helpful in the long term," Northwestern University Law School associate professor Zev Eigen said.

Both sides have only released summaries of the proposed agreement. But outside observers said the tentative contract appears to be a win for the union's 25,000 teachers. While teachers in San Francisco haven't gotten an across-the-board raise in years, for example, Chicago teachers are in line for raises in each of the proposed deal's three years with provisions for a fourth. In Cleveland, teachers recently agreed to the same kind of evaluation system based in part on student performance that Chicago has offered.

"The district went past the halfway mark," said Kate Walsh, president of the National Council on Teacher Quality. "They got a pretty good deal."

Some union members in Chicago praised the school district's move on what percentage of test scores will be factored into teacher evaluations, down from the 45 percent proposed to the 30 percent set as the minimum by state law. It also includes an appeals process to contest evaluations. The new evaluations would be phased in over the length of the contract.

1/2

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
16 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
brwing says:
Fire them all.
Let them apply for jobs with adjusted contract that makes sense for us not them.
Evaluate on their student progress year to year based on stats already known.
Make them pay for pensions and make pay merit based.
When you strike you may just lose.
Make them lose.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tsigili says:
Hope they reject it.

The people need to see how bad unions really are!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
taxed01 says:
A nice raise on top of the average $76,000 wage for 9.5 months work. A million dollar pension plan. OK to keep the job even if you are not that good. A 39% high school drop out rate. I'd say they did OK.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
john92021 says:
keep up the good strike, maybe we can get 100% drop-out rate.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wine1982 says:
Are you kidding me? They are getting a 16% raise over 4 years and they want more? Everyone should contribute to their health insurance and it should be up to the local principal or school board to determine the fate of teachers. The unions are too strong, Public employees should not be able to strike and government should have the power to terminate when they do!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wine1982 says:
Are you kidding me? They are getting a 16% raise over 4 years and they want more? Everyone should contribute to their health insurance and it should be up to the local principal or school board to determine the fate of teachers. The unions are too strong, Public employees should not be able to strike and government should have the power to terminate when they do!!
reply
sjc_1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You need to research your numbers, it is 3% per tear for the first 3 years and an optional 4th if both parties agree. The offer is 7% over 3 years and not 9% that is asked.

They also want up to $250 repayment for supplies they pay for. They should not have to pay for these in the first place, repaying them seems more than fair.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
14FREEK says:
The union needs to stick with the stike. Rahm, like any other strike breaker, will do and say anything to get you back to work before you get everything you NEED. He knows once you get back to work you will not want to leave. It is a tried and true strike breaker tactic. Don't fall for it. Keep going back to work off the table usntil you get what you need.

Everybody can't be a salesman. In a democracy we pick a leader to represent us. Sometimes the leader has to make the hard choices. It is your job to do the best thing for the children. You and you alone have their best interest at heart.

The parents want a babysitter.

Rahm wants to save money.

You are the one who has to worry about-student pass rates. How do you fix that? Better teachers. How do you get better teachers? Better pay, working conditions, benefits, administrative support. Better pay costs more money. Better working conditions (22 students in a class instead of 38 = more teachers and more space) costs money. Better benefits costs more money, better administrative support means more support and better personnel which will cost more money.

THERE IS NO BETTER INVESTMENT THAN OUR CHILDREN.

It is up to the teachers.
reply
sjc_1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Good comment, but you have to see that YOUR kids are not THEIR responsibility. THEY send their kids to private school and want a tax payer voucher to do so. YOUR kids go to public school and they could not give a darn about them. Sad, but I believe it is true and at the center of the problem in America, an US versus THEM mentality, the rich DON'T CARE about anyone else.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bagberry says:
THe best thing about this strike is that America gets to see the unions for what they are. Anti American. They care more about themselves than educating our children. They care more about how much dues they can collect than showing up or doing their job. It is time to end public unions in this country and take away their power to hold America hostage and continue to teach nonsense to our children. Frankly, I'd fire them all and start up home schooling classes, more charter schools, more private schools, and make the parents become involved with the education of their kids. If they all realized that their children are being indoctrinated, not taught, they wouldn't send them to those schools at all. Even parents with no college education can teach their children better than these union guys. Look at their record in Chicago. And they think they should get more? The government is going broke and they want 15 percent raises in "the worst economy ever." The public union leaders should be sent to jail along with all of their cronies from Chicago that are already in jail. Fire them all! Take back our country. Reagan got it right. When a strike is illegal, you give the workers a chance to get back to work, if they don't come, you fire them.
reply
lillyhorton replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You don't work for free amnd neither do they. You don't spend your "off" hours creating lesson plans. When you attend your 15 minute meeting with the teacher for conferences she will be there until 7pm not earning one dime more.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Dr_Cruel says:
Fire them. Fire them all. Start from scratch with non-union teachers.
reply
lillyhorton replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Go ahead. You get what you pay for.
BothPartiesBite replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lilly - And what are we getting now from one of the highest paid school districts in the country? 55% graduation rates. If my business only turned out a good product 55 out of every 100 units I would be unemployed and looking for a job!
See all 4 Replies
See all 16 Comments