AP/ September 14, 2012, 1:37 AM

Emergency motion filed against enforcing Arizona immigration law "show me your papers" provision

Protester opposed to Arizona's immigration law argues with police officer in April in Phoenix

Protester opposed to Arizona's immigration law argues with police officer in April in Phoenix / Jonathan Gibby/Getty Images

(AP) PHOENIX — Opponents have asked a federal judge to delay Arizona authorities from enforcing the most contentious section of the state's heavily debated immigration law.

A Sept. 5 ruling by U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton cleared the way for police to carry out the requirement that officers question the immigration status of those they suspect are in the country illegally while enforcing other laws.

Police in legal minefield on Ariz. immigration law
Fed judge: Ariz. police can check for papers

The provision is expected to go into effect soon, once Bolton finalizes her order.

But a coalition of civil rights, religious and business groups on Thursday filed an eight-page emergency motion for an injunction pending appeal.

Critics have assailed the "show me your papers" provision, saying it paves the way for ethnic discrimination and racial profiling, providing officers a justification for stopping people based on how they look.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
41 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CrossroadTours says:
Ok so my question is. Im part hispanic. But I was born in Ohio. If they thought I was not here legally and asked to see my papers and all I could give them would be my drivers license and maybe my SSN card. Would that be enough? I dont carry around my birth certificate.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ammo17 says:
nobody in this country can tell me the democrats are not lost with the departure of the ACORN SOCIETY.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
grannygoody says:
Why such hatred in USA against immigrants? Most American families parents or grandparents came here from other countries. This country was founded on principles of Freedom, Liberty & Equality, and these evil diatribes disgust me!
reply
UForgotPoland replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
At least our first generation of family members bothered to learn English.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Linux_Lewis says:
"Anti-Racists" say there should be no White Countries
"Anti-Racists" say there should be no White Towns
"Anti-Racists" say there should be no White Neighbourhoods
"Anti-Racists" say there should be no White Schools
"Anti-Racists" say there should be no White Anything
"Anti-Racists" say there should be no White Children

"Anti-Racists" haven't told Asian or African children that they must be blended out of existence to "end racism". They only demand this global program of genocide onto white children.

Anti-racist is a code word for Anti-White.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DF007 says:
Without the enactment of mandated E-Verify; THE LEGAL WORKFORCE ACT or an amendment to Birthright citizenship fiasco, the taxpayers will be weighed down with vast costs without end.

President Obama should he win the election has promised that he would force passage of another Comprehensive Immigration policy. This would then substantiate that both parties would never fully enforce immigration laws, whether going against the U.S. constitution by presidential authority as we saw with passage of the Dream Act. Since the 1986 Simpson/Mazzoli bill signed into law, everything has been compromised by a failure to fully fund the policies. This has been proven by systematic failure to make illegal entry a felony, the fact the real double layer fence doesn't exist, that the instigators of Sanctuary city ordinances are not punished by ICE and that the Birth instant baby citizenship law hasn't been amended in the name of saving taxpayers over $100 billion dollars annually. THIS IS NOT ABOUT LAWFUL IMMIGRANTS; THIS IS ABOUT ILLEGAL ALIENS, THAT THE LIBERAL MAINSTREAM EDITORIAL PRESS REFUSES TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN THE TWO CLASSIFICATIONS.

America has giant magnetism to people who are drawn here for public programs, that Obama czars have compromised welfare essentially drafted for citizens and lawful immigrants. These illegal entries that skirt our laws know more about our benefit laws than a good many U.S. citizens? This has especially drained the treasury of states run mainly by liberal-Marxist assemblies as California, Nevada, and New York with bloated populations of illegal aliens. Over past decades our nation has been under assault by the poverty of other countries, bringing their unborn babies here to take advantage of a passionate country that in this present climate can no longer afford to feed the world, or offer uncompensated health care. Even more significant is the onslaught of parents and children that lawfully enter our country through Chain Migration.

These hundreds upon hundreds of billions of dollars should be spent on the legal population, not in harboring foreign nations that continually challenge our laws and succeed with Liberal interpretation of our laws in the courts. Neither Obama nor Romney will enforce immigration laws, but the thorough saturation of TEA PARTY legislators into the Republican Party will have great influence and empowerment to propel the Senate and House into fighting against the Socialistic conspiracy or the GOP elitists who want to keep things as they are?

The only avenue left to provide financial relief against the Communist founded ACLU and other organizations is to implement these two laws. It will not matter if questioning of immigration status is enacted or not by police, if a mandated E-verify nationwide and an amendment to the Birthright citizen law is amended, then employers will be heavily prosecuted for hiring illegal aliens and smuggled fetuses within the mother to get a foothold on American monetary benefits, will become a thing of the past? This will be up to the voter and if not executing these laws, will be a massive tax burden on taxpayers forever.

Here are a few of the issues that can be altered by the TEA PARTY LEADERSHIP:

1. The TEA PARTY can force a vote on the 'Legal Workforce Act' (E-Verify) and enact it as mandatory in every business nationwide. Those who feel they are not accountable will be looking at hefty fines, loss of assets and even prison. All those who ignore the I-9 audits in not implementing the computer to detect illegal aliens in the workplace will be sanctioned?

2. The TEA PARTY will force a vote on the 'Birthright Citizenship Act' concluding once and for all, that pregnant women can no longer gain citizenship through a misguided loophole for a child, just by slipping past Customs and Immigration Enforcement (ICE) at the border or over staying a visa, leading ultimately to yet another 'Blanket Amnesty'. What about American teenagers, who have been pushed out of jobs that were the monopoly for our kids a couple of decades back?

Both major political parties wants a true end to illegal immigration, but the millions of citizens and residents in the TEA PARTY will insure that citizens and lawful immigrants always get first priority—not pandering to foreign nationals. Incidentally—readers should go to teaparty.org and then judge for yourself, if Obama is Liberal friends in the press are concealing the truth?

ATTN: The TEA PARTY will be safeguarding the nationwide election procedure, watching for non-citizens voting in November. As for Sheriff Joe, if the election for him is not derailed by "Voter Fraud" he will certainly win? Joe Arpaio must fight against such radical organizations La Raza, that are is being funded by the U.S government, with taxpayer's money.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gjc1n1 says:
I've encouraged my grandchildren to study Spanish and I'm thinking about it for myself. Nothing wrong with that. If people don't adapt to change, they will be left behind. Part of Darwin's theory of evolution. Get used to it.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Dynamic20120407 says:
If the shoe were on the other foot - Mexico does not allow foreign-born citizens to hold any public office, nor are they allowed to own real estate that is located near the shorelines. If you were to cross the border into Mexico in order to work there without permission, I'm sure they would have you in jail based on your looks within a few minutes of your arrival. They don't dink around with human rights, if you're there illegally you're going to be sitting in a jail cell for more than a few days.
reply
gjc1n1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The difference is, who wants to immigrate to Mexico? You immigrate for a better life and that you won't get in Mexico.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
borismcchesny says:
Honest Americans get asked to show ID routinely for all kinds typical life activities - it's not a big deal.
reply
sgbarnes1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I believe that Federal immigration law requires all legal immigrants to carry their paperwork with them. If that is the case, there should be no problem with asking for ID. I have constantly been amazed at domestic workers not having their work permit on them when applying to work for me.
netjunkie1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I would hope he dishonest Americans get ID'd more...it is a big deal
See all 4 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Scimajor says:
This kind of thing is nothing new. A man was allowed to bring a weapon onto my son's school grounds solely based on how he was dressed and what race he appear to belong to. Yes, it's true and it's the law.

The man was dressed as a Sikh, appeared to be of Indian origin and was wearing what appeared to be a kirpan. He was allowed on campus with a dagger simple due to his ethnic origin and his costume.

I just hope nobody shows up who looks like a Texan and is dressed like a cowboy. They might assume he belongs to the Church of Smith and Wesson and allow him on campus on religious grounds.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gjc1n1 says:
By mid-century, whites will be a minority. That's not just my opinion but the conclusion of several studies based on census figures. By then, perhaps those who are bigots today will get a dose of their own medicine. By the way, I'm a white, middle-class citizen and I support minority rights on all fronts.
reply
borismcchesny replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
What's bigoted about enforcing immigration laws for people of any stripe?
sgbarnes1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Perhpas not if we can elect Republicans who will revoke the Dream Amnesty and will pass e-verify and other laws. Perhaps they will remove social benefits from illegals too.
See all 11 Replies
See all 41 Comments