AP/ August 25, 2012, 9:33 PM

Grizzly bear kills hiker in Denali National Park

AP Graphics

(AP) ANCHORAGE, Alaska - A hiker in Alaska's Denali National Park photographed a grizzly bear for at least eight minutes before the bear mauled and killed him in the first fatal attack in the park's history, officials said Saturday.

Investigators have recovered the camera and looked at the photographs, which show the bear grazing and not acting aggressively before the attack, Denali Park Superintendent Paul Anderson said.

The hiker was backpacking alone along the Toklat River on Friday afternoon when he came within 50 yards of the bear, far closer than the quarter-mile of separation required by park rules, officials said.

"They show the bear grazing in the willows, not acting aggressive in any form or manor during that period of time," Anderson said.

Investigators have identified the man but won't release his name until they've notified his family. They said he's a U.S. citizen but declined to release any other information about him. Rangers were hoping to recover his remains later Saturday after ensuring the scene was safe. Several other bears have been seen in the area.

Officials learned of the attack after hikers stumbled upon an abandoned backpack along the river about three miles from a rest area on Friday afternoon. The hikers also spotted torn clothing and blood. They immediately hiked back and alerted staff park.

Rangers in a helicopter spotted a large male grizzly bear sitting on the hiker's remains, which they called a "food cache" in the underbrush about 100 to 150 yards from the site of the attack on Friday. A state trooper shot and killed the bear on Saturday, and investigators will examine its stomach contents and use other tests to confirm it's the animal that killed the hiker.

There's no indication that the man's death was the result of anything other than a bear attack, investigators said, adding that it's the first known fatal mauling in the park's nearly century-long history.

"Over the years, and especially since the 1970s, the park has worked very diligently to minimize the conflict between humans and wildlife in the park," Anderson said. "We have some of the most stringent human-wildlife conflict regulations in the National Park system, and I think those are largely responsible for the fact that there hasn't been a fatal attack."

Park officials said they don't believe other registered backpackers are in the immediate area. That portion of the park is closed but other wilderness areas remain open, officials said.

Prior to receiving a permit to hike in the area, all backpackers in the park receive mandatory bear awareness training that teaches them to stay at least a quarter-mile away from bears, and to slowly back away if they find themselves any closer. Investigators confirmed that the hiker had received that training.

Denali is located 240 miles north of Anchorage. It spans more than 6 million acres and is home to numerous wild animals, including bears, wolves, caribou and moose.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
32 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
167irishboy says:
If you go hiking in Alaska by yourself and are unarmed, you are asking to be killed and eaten by wildlife. How stupid can someone be?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
shenboe says:
I would not be hiking around Smokey without a big gun, if only to scare away wildlife with the sound. A quarter mile may be a good rule, but while I would allow you to bet your life on it, I would not.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
coolafella says:
"in any form or manor"... You would think AP could hire writers who were proficient in grammar. ... form or manner.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
th9876 says:
Everytime I reaed a report like this it reminds me of one of Mark Twain's lesser known short stories: "The Victims"... Certainly the photographer meant no harm to the Grizzly, but breaking the rules and putting yourself at risk like that pretty much spells doom to the bear, unfortunately. So sad, the bear was just protecting itself from a perceived threat and he gets killed. Humans, gems of the creation, and so stupid at the same time.
reply
newsjunkie_56 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yep, we really are something aren't we? We humans only use 10% of our brain yet kill anything we see as a threat to ourselves and then thump our chests in pride. No wonder animals run in the other direction when they see us. They are the smarter breed when all is said and done.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jackpenn says:
It is a shame for both the hiker and the bear, because once again consequences follow when rules are broken. Why would anyone in their right mind hike alone in such vast wilderness known to be the home territory of wild bears, wolves, and other man-eating carnavores? I guess it is true; "stupid is; what stupid does." Once a bear or other meat eating predators eat a human being they must be killed, or they will hunt for other human beings to dine on. Animals can't distinquish between man and beast when they are hungry, and man should have enough sense to know this fact of nature. How many people have been killed, because they thought they could control the nature of a beast?
reply
displeased2 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
"How many people have been killed, because they thought they could control the nature of a beast?"
by jackpenn August 26, 2012 11:18 AM EDT

Well, considering the millions of people who venture into the wilderness, and considering the amount of people who do it alone, including myself, I'd say not many people are killed.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
1stlttightwad says:
Goes to show you...being stupid is a deadly trait...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
alpinequeen says:
These are not cartoon animals.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
OnTheRoad01 says:
How do you say 'All you can eat buffet' in grizzly? I beleive it is 'Stupid'!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gerryrigger says:
Stalking an intelligent, formidable carnivore/omnivore with keen senses for eight minutes at close range was asking for trouble. The animal sensed it was being stalked and felt threatened, making it attack the threat. After the kill, he discovered it was edible, he was hungry, so why let it go to waste?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
officerjoe says:
Bears respond to people's body language in sizing up a threat.Photographers are at high risk because they assume the same positions as hunters: sneaking up on the animals,lying down in the brush,using telephoto sights etc, and in haste to get a good shot they oft times get closer and stay longer than safety permits.Unfortunately this is an occupational risk because these photos are in demand for educational purposes etc... The fact is no one may be to blame here.The Grisley was just being a Grisley and the photographer was just being a photographer.Photos fron 1/4 mile away?Really? My only question is was an autopsy done before the bear was killed?It doesn't sound like it.They simply say there is no reason to assume the bear didn't kill him.This guy could have had a heart attack and in that case it wouldn't be long before some animal devoured him.This has happened numerous times.
reply
OnTheRoad01 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The man was 'just being a photographer'! Does that mean that he should be forgiven for breaking the rules that he was given and causing the death of the thing that he wanted to photograph? I'm sorry but 'being a photographer' does not give anyone the right to be stupid and not following the 'rules'!
shenboe replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Sorry, but examinations are done on live subjects whereas autopsies are done on dead ones.
See all 32 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right