Poll: NYC racially divided over "stop and frisk"

Opponents of the New York Police Department's controversial 'stop-and-frisk' policy rally on January 27, 2012 in the Bronx borough of New York City. / Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images

(CBS/AP) NEW YORK - New York City voters are divided along racial lines over the New York Police Department's "stop-and-frisk" strategy, according to a poll released Thursday.

The Quinnipiac University survey found that 57 percent of white city voters approve of the Police Department's practice of detaining and sometimes searching anyone officers deem suspicious. But only 25 percent of black voters surveyed said they approve of the policy, which affects many more minorities than white residents. Of those surveyed, 53 percent of Hispanics said they approve of the practice.

The NYPD stopped close to 700,000 people on the street last year. Nearly 87 percent were black or Hispanic, and about half were frisked. About 10 percent were arrested.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg argues that the program is an indispensable tool in the fight against illegal guns. But critics argue the practice unfairly targets minorities.

Overall approval for stop and frisk was at 45 percent, while disapproval was at 50 percent. Some 64 percent of voters said they approve of Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly's job performance. His approval among whites was at 77 percent, while among blacks, it was at 51 percent.

The random survey of 1,298 city voters was conducted by telephone from Aug. 8 to Aug. 12. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.7 percentage points.

Harlem resident Jackie Rowe-Adams, who lost two sons to gun violence, told CBS News correspondent Elaine Quijano that she supports the stop and frisk strategy but acknowledges the policy is controversial. (Watch full report at left).

"See, you have to walk in my shoes to understand when I say that stop and frisk is needed," Rowe-Adams said. "Maybe if they would have stopped and frisked those kids who shot my two kids, maybe they would still be alive."

Some critics say the program is broken and abused. Rowe-Adams said that doesn't mean the policy, in theory, is ineffective.

"That program, if it's broken, it needs to be fixed by community leaders," she said. "And they need to sit at the table and help fix it. But we certainly don't need to stop it."

[hemusbull]

There isn't a way not to do racial profile - statistics says it very simply that crimes are not equaly distirbuted between the various ra ces and this is a fact!

[HolyVoice]

Yeah, I believe you're right in some repect. We can look upon it like this:

In New York City,

87% of all street crimes are distributed between the various races

10% of all white-collar crimes are distributed between the various races.

I think the latter adds up to billions and trillions of dollars, but both are reflective of the economic gap of wealth in our population. I would guess that for white-collar crime, the other 90% might be non-minorities.

[formerlyluvnut]

As much as I like the idea, I do feel it is a stretch of authority; this is NOT a free society anymore. More like nazi Germany. I am a white boy by the way.

[hemusbull]

Each given democracy is ...a police state!

[HolyVoice]

Good for you. You're not subjected to this and don't need to be worried about them coming after you.

[john92021]

about time we set up checkpoints, check papers, travel permits. All those returning vets need jobs, they are good at this. There,s a greater need to control the peasants every day. Set up work camps, re-education camps, maybe even some death camps down the line.
Hasn't this been tried before?

[lfreeman1111]

Clothing choice or color of skin is NOT cause for suspicion. Tons of theivin' meth addicts are white and clean and sweet-looking. If you are going to stop and frisk, *frisk everyone*, that is the only fair way to go about it.

[expatriate2]

If you create a high crime area, you pay the price. Some nations have neighborhood probation until the community solves its own problem. The problem in historic in New York and it's time to think of the victims, not in inconvenience of those who are either part of or condone the problem.