CBS/AP/ August 6, 2012, 1:45 PM

Sikh temple shooting weapon obtained legally

Police walk near the Sikh Temple of Wisconsin in Oak Creek, Wis., after a shooting Sunday, Aug 5, 2012. A gunman killed six people at the suburban Milwaukee temple in a rampage that left terrified congregants hiding in closets and others texting friends outside for help. The suspect was killed outside the temple in a shootout with police officers. (AP Photo/Jeffrey Phelps)

Police walk near the Sikh Temple of Wisconsin in Oak Creek, Wis., after a shooting Sunday, Aug 5, 2012. A gunman killed six people at the suburban Milwaukee temple in a rampage that left terrified congregants hiding in closets and others texting friends outside for help. The suspect was killed outside the temple in a shootout with police officers. (AP Photo/Jeffrey Phelps) / Jeffrey Phelps

Updated 4:20 p.m. ET

(CBS/AP) OAK CREEK, Wis. - The weapon used in Sunday's mass shooting at a Sikh temple in this Milwaukee suburb, in which six people were killed and three wounded before the gunman was killed by police, was purchased legally, authorities said.

At a press conference Monday Special Agent Bernard Zapor of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said the weapon, a 9 mm semiautomatic handgun with multiple ammunition magazines, had been obtained legally by the suspect, Wade Michael Page.

"The person who purchased it was not legally prevented from buying it," Zapor said. There were also additional ammunition magazines found at the crime scene.

Wade was killed outside the temple in a shootout with police officers after the rampage that left terrified congregants hiding in closets and others texting friends outside for help.

While police said Monday that they believed there were no additional shooters involved, FBI Special Agent in Charge Teresa Carlson said that the FBI is asking for public assistance in identifying whom she called a "person of interest" in the case as they continue to track down and interview family members and associates of the gunman, but that person has since been cleared, reported CBS News correspondent Andres Triay.

Sikh temple shooting suspect identified as Wade Michael Page
American Sikhs' worst fear realized
Shooting at Sikh temple in Wis., at least 7 dead

Page served in the U.S. Army for about six years. According to sources in the Army, Page enlisted in April 1992 and was given a less-than-honorable discharge in October 1998. He served at Fort Bliss, Texas, in the psychological operations unit in 1994, and was last stationed at Fort Bragg, N.C., attached to the psychological operations unit. The details of his discharge were not immediately clear.

Page was a white supremacist, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Carlson said the FBI is looking into possible ties to white supremacist groups, and that Page "had contact with law enforcement in the past," but officials said, to their knowledge, there were no pending investigations involving Page prior to Sunday's shooting.

"There may be references to [Page] in various files - those are being analyzed right now," Carlson said. Page's military's records are also being analyzed.

Carlson said it is too early in the investigation to tell whether it would be classified at a hate crime or as a possible domestic terrorism case.

On Sunday night, the FBI sent a SWAT team and an evidence response team to Page's apartment in in nearby Cudahy.

Oak Creek Police Chief John Edwards said the gunman "ambushed" one of the first officers who arrived at the temple responding to 911 calls. As the officer, Lt. Brian Murphy, a 21-year veteran with tactical experience, tended to a victim outside, he was shot eight or nine times at very close range, Edwards said.

Other officers arriving at the scene heard the gunshots, observed the suspect in the parking lot and gave commands for him to stop.


1/2

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
14 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mrjustice1 says:
This is no peaceful, or magnanimous era in America or in the world.

The days of "The Wild West" were more sensible, in that they offered a small, gentle, non-agressive man "equalization" by his carrying a gun. That discouraged bandits and other rough and tough outlaws, from robbing, beating, or murdering, the gentle man and his family, as well as prevented rape of his wife or daughters.

Decent, law-abiding citizens DO need guns along with proper training for self-protection - protection which the police or authorities offer nearly none. Police only come onto the scene AFTER it's too late.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mrjustice1 says:
This is no peaceful, or magnanimous era in America or in the world.

The days of "The Wild West" were more sensible, in that they offered a small, gentle, non-agressive man "equalization" by his carrying a gun. That discouraged bandits and other rough and tough outlaws, from robbing, beating, or murdering, the gentle man and his family, as well as prevented rape of his wife or daughters.

Decent, law-abiding citizens DO need guns along with proper training for self-protection - protection which the police or authorities offer nearly none. Police only come onto the scene AFTER it's too late.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FoolKiller says:
They need to make up their mind what kind of discharge he had from the military. If dishonorable, then he DID NOT legally buy the weapon, nor could he ever.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wdrussell1 says:
If you banned baggers, birthers, and bigots, you wouldn't have to think about banning guns.
reply
FoolKiller replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
But if we just banned you and the like, there would be no need to ban THEM.
keote_poet replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I agree...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fstopme says:
ROCKY said "so is fertilizer and fuel oil. ban fuel oil"

because guns are so much more easy to use.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
57vw says:
Another gun free zone massacre. When will we learn the only people that obey the gun free zones are the victims.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Godsmack4 says:
Of corse he bought it legally he was in the Army for 6 years! Why is it worth a mention? If he bought it illegally all he would need is the money also! Sheesh.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Raptorsmasher says:
New Rule: If one receieves anything less than an honorable discharge from the military, that person will not be allowed to purchase a weapon of any kind.
reply
buchkshot replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Question g, Form 4473: Have you been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions? Military is probably relunctant to issue dishonorable discharges because certain benefits might be revoked such as VA benefits etc... let alone buying a gun.
fstopme replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Sounds reasonable to me.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cntrygirl3 says:
Why on earth would anyone have thought he didn't get the gun legally. After all guns are so easily purchased, all he needed was the money.
reply
darkhorseky replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Sorry , That was kinda funny, If you have the money you can buy it either way. Also Iam sure if you go to the border of Mexico you can buy just about anything you wanted.proberly the same weapons our Goverment sold them. Of course they would make a profit of them instead of our goverment losing money on them.
See all 14 Comments