Ind. "Dexter" teen killer's life sentence upheld

Andrew Conley, 17, is led from an Ohio County courtroom after his hearing, Friday, Dec. 4, 2009 in Rising Sun, Ind. / AP Photo

(AP) INDIANAPOLIS - The Indiana Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a sentence of life without parole for a teenager who said he wanted to be like the fictional television serial killer Dexter a few weeks before strangling his 10-year-old brother.

Andrew Conley was 17 in November 2009 when he killed his brother, Conner, while wrestling in their home near Rising Sun and dumped the boy's body in a park. He unexpectedly pleaded guilty in September 2010, averting a murder trial.

In the 3-2 ruling, the justices said Conley acted "as if nothing was out of the ordinary" after the killing. According to testimony during the five-day sentencing hearing, Conley joked with his mother and watched football the day after he killed Conner.

Conley told police he fantasized about killing people since he was in eighth grade. A few weeks before the killing, Conley told his girlfriend that he wanted to be just like the TV serial killer as they walked on the trail where he later disposed of his brother's body.

Three different psychological experts who interviewed Conley all said he was seriously mentally ill, but his appellate lawyer, Leanna Weissmann, said the judge gave too much credence to a psychologist's testimony that the teen could be a psychopath.

Weissmann did not return a phone call Tuesday seeking comment about the ruling.

The U.S. Supreme Court in June threw out mandatory sentences of life in prison without parole for juveniles, but left open the possibility that individual judges could sentence juveniles to life without parole in individual cases of murder.

The Indiana justices noted that the high court's decision dealt only with mandatory sentences, not those issued at a judge's discretion. They found "no abuse of discretion" in Ohio County Circuit Court Judge James Humphrey decision.

"The heinous facts of this crime are difficult to comprehend," they said.

Conley told police he held his brother in a choke hold while wrestling at their rural home and dragged him into the kitchen after he passed out, where he strangled him for 20 minutes. He then wrapped the boy's head in two plastic bags.

A coroner testified that Conner may have still been alive for minutes or hours after that point, but the bags helped suffocate him, and Conley repeatedly banged the boy's head on the ground before loading him in the trunk of his car to make sure he was dead. He then drove to his girlfriend's home and gave her a promise ring, while Conner's body was still in the trunk of his car.

The two justices who dissented in Tuesday's ruling, Robert Rucker and Frank Sullivan, cited the teen's age when arguing that he shouldn't have been sentenced to die in prison.

"There is no question that juveniles have developmental issues that reduce their culpability for crimes," Rucker wrote.

Dearborn-Ohio County Prosecutor Aaron Negangard, who handled the case, said the high court made the right decision.

"It is the just result given the nature of the crime that he committed," Negangard said.

[EKKADIDDLEHOPPER]

Flog him viciously every second day for 100 days, drawing blood liberally, splashing generous amounts of alcohol in the wounds during and after the flogging, all to be televised. Let's have him beg and apologize profusely for the murder instinct. Afterwards, drop him from a helicopter in the middle of Lake Michigan.

[djseavy]

I used to be against the death penalty in all cases, but lately I've decided that - when there is no question whatsoever that someone committed such a horrible crime, then the ultimate penalty is warranted. This guy; the Aurora shooter; the Ft. Hood shooter etc. all should be put down. I don't care what the bleeding hearts say; if someone is witnessed or pleads guilty and there can be no doubt, forget life in prison. Part of the reason this stuff happens is due to not using the death penalty often enough. Furthermore, to eliminate the possibility of executing an innocent person, DNA and other evidence should be collected immediately so that someone doesn't come with in hours of execution only to find out they are indeed innocent. But the truly guilty - off with their heads.

[democracy8]

I agree 100%.

[nohater]

if it were my decision, he would be executed by the end of the year if not already. fortunately for him, it's not my decision. indiana should have condemned him to death. as for the psychologists, they can go pound salt as talk therapy, which psychologists do, won't cure jack if someone is a hardcore criminal as this man.