CBS News/ July 31, 2012, 2:08 PM

Study: Most view Aurora as isolated incident

Crime scene tape surrounds the Century 16 movie theater where 12 people were killed in a shooting rampage July 23, 2012, in Aurora, Colo.

Crime scene tape surrounds the Century 16 movie theater where 12 people were killed in a shooting rampage July 23, 2012, in Aurora, Colo. / Getty Images

(CBS News) Although the recent movie theater shooting rampage in Aurora, Colo, has revived somewhat the issue of gun control as a topic of national debate, two-thirds of Americans see the shooting as an isolated incident, leaving public views of gun control largely unchanged since the attack, a recent Pew Research Center poll found.

According to the study, conducted on July 26-29, 47 percent of Americans said it is more important to control gun ownership, while 46 percent said it is important to protect gun ownership. That, according to Pew, remained on par with figures from April, where 45 percent were for tighter gun control and 49 percent were for gun rights protection.

Read the Pew Research study
Fear prompts gun sales, panic after Colo. massacre

About 67 percent of Americans polled said that they viewed the Aurora shooting, in which 12 people were killed, as an isolated incident; only 24 percent believe the event was indicative of a greater societal problem. That reflects a trend to see mass shootings as isolated incidents. After the 2007 Virginia Tech massacre that left 33 dead, Americans were split on whether it was a reflection of broader social problems - 47 percent saw the incident in isolation compared with 46 who viewed it as a sign of larger societal ills. After last year's Tucson shooting that killed six and wounded then-Rep.Gabrielle Giffords, those figures were 58 percent and 31 percent, respectively.

The study added that those similar incidents, Virginia Tech and Tucson, didn't much change people's views of gun laws either.

Pew also said the issue of guns is also divided among political partisans, with Democrats favoring gun control by a margin of 72 percent to 21 percent, while Republicans supporting gun rights by a 71 percent to 26 percent margin.

The debate over guns also crosses along race, with 56 percent of white Americans in favor of gun rights compared to 73 percent of black Americans in favor of gun control; and gender, with 57 percent of men backing gun rights compared to 56 percent of women supporting gun control.

Following the Aurora shooting, gun sales in Colorado went up. During the weekend right after the incident, about 2,887 people were approved for background checks to purchase firearms in the state. Buyers' concerns over tightening gun restrictions led to the increase in sales.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
15 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
erasmus111 says:
"Most view Aurora as isolated incident"

Of course they do. To say otherwise would be admitting they have a problem and that just ain't going to happen. They would not be able to justify having their guns then.
reply
erasmus111 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mecanik, something for you to read.

http://news.sympatico.ca/oped/coffee-talk/american_police_officer_bemoans_lack_of_guns_in_canada/5161d1e6
erasmus111 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ZionistCensorship

Yup, that Canada! : )
linkicon reporticon emailicon
erasmus111 says:
Americans have grown up with guns. They think all their problems can be solved with that good old gun.

The rest of the world thinks that Americans are arrogant. And I have to say, from all the posts I've read over the years, it does seem that a lot of Americans think they are better than everyone else. And within the country, there is such hatred for each other. A constant bickering and fighting over everything. And there is this "every man for himself" attitude.

Every day I see numerous stories of people shooting each other. Kids getting a hold of guns. There are constant stories of parents not looking after their kids. Parents TORTURING there kids. I always joke about how there must be something in the water, but it really is no joke.

It's the year 2012 and you guys are still running around shooting each other, have major racism, no health care for everyone, and a lousy educational system. Other countries have it figured out, but for some reason you guys can't.

There is something seriously wrong in America.
reply
Solarrays247 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Excellent post, and I agree! We're still stuck in the ol' Wild West mentality, while the rest of the nations in the developed world have moved on!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
erasmus111 says:
OMG. Unbelievable. An ISOLATED INCIDENT?? Seriously??

You guys have a mass shooting almost every freakin' week!

And it is a reflection of "broader social problems", as well as TOO MANY GUNS.
reply
Solarrays247 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
As well as too many hateful pundits like Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck driving the masses into a hateful, shameful mentality of it's "them" vs "us". I still can't get Limpballs comments out of my mind that he made on air about the Dark Knight movie just days before this mass murder took place. He had the audacity to accuse director and producers of having an ulterior motive to mess around with Romney's campaign run for president. There's nuts out there picking up these sick messages every damn day in this country...and then "they" wonder why so many people are so f'd up in this country?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hypnotoad72 says:
So were Columbine, McVeigh, the dude who whipped out his in Norway last year, etc...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
beachgirl2365 says:
Today I was listening to the factual history of our nation & gun control, & the history of the NRA. Did you know the NRA was founded originally as the consensus was that the civil war went on for so long because the Union soldiers were such poor shots. So the NRA was founded to promote gun safety & proficiency. Back in the 1920's and 1930's the NRA was pro-gun control. Hell our government even had people register their guns back in the 1600-1700's I guess the point I am trying to make is that our country's history with guns & the controversy re gun control has been around since the founding fathers. Maybe if everyone had a little history lesson regarding guns & ownership in our country, we could find a common ground.
reply
996Ducati replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Perhaps "beachgirl2365" also needs a history lesson because it was not "our" government back in the 1600s-1700's. At that time, we were governed or controlled by England. We declared independance from the Brits in 1776.
996Ducati replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Perhaps "beachgirl2365" also needs a history lesson because it was not "our" government back in the 1600s-1700's. At that time, we were governed or controlled by England. We declared independance from the Brits in 1776.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jumkey says:
Not an isolated event? You mean different from the one that happened last week and the one that will happen next week?

We could easily solve this problem, but we would rather have the violent murder of innocents than actually doing anything.

Americans don't care that children are murdered.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RickyTick123 says:
"Buyers' concerns over tightening gun restrictions led to the increase in sales."
Really, defending oneself against the threat of a random wackjob had nothing to do with the sales increase? Do some research and you may find that people buy firearms to defend themselves against the threats that the US Government has done nothing to combat (Flash Mobs by 'youths', rampant illegal immigration, violent inner-city knifing/beating crimes, etc). From your article, one would infer a gun buyer is in more fear of our Government taking away their Constitutional Rights than crime protection.

Not everything happens the way our Government and its lapdog, the Media, want it to.
reply
hypnotoad72 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
1. The press needs to earn money
2. The press does this by putting out articles for people to read
3. Advertisers pay for space the press offers
4. To maximize the profit potential, the press charges more money for articles more likely to be read/seen by many


To expand point 2:

Which article will more people be inclined to read - the one about death, destruction, or celebrity divorce (as if we have a chance to get with the newly single people) or the one about the little girl in a sun dress picking pansies all morning with a grin on her face?

To expand point 3:

Advertisers raise up the cost of their products in these ads to help compensate for the costs. If you don't like ads, write the company and demand they stop making the ads and then double-demand the cost-savings trickle down to the consumer (and we know that won't happen because their profit margins are more important than the readers/viewers/target markets...)

The press is not "liberal".

It's "capitalist".

As are the advertisers.

Who is the lapdog, again?
See all 15 Comments