
Top to bottom, clockwise: A Remington 870 shotgun; Smith & Wesson model M&P15T rifle; and a Glock 22 handgun - models of weapons reportedly purchased by shooting suspect James Holmes. / CBS
(AP) WASHINGTON - A federal law enforcement official said the semi-automatic assault rifle used in the deadly Colorado movie theater shooting jammed during the attack.
The official said late Saturday the rifle had a high-capacity ammunition magazine which, based on witness accounts and evidence collected at the scene, apparently jammed.
The rifle's malfunction then forced the suspected shooter, James Holmes, to switch to another weapon.
The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the investigation.
Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates has said a 100-round drum magazine was recovered at the scene of the shooting in suburban Denver. Oates said such a weapon was capable of firing 50 to 60 rounds a minute.
Police said Holmes also had two Glock pistols and a shotgun.
Holmes, a 24-year-old former graduate student, is in custody. The attack early Friday killed 12 people and wounded nearly 60 others.
Investigators track Colo. shooting suspect's ammo shipments
Colo. shooting re-ignites gun control debate
Explosive material removed from suspect's apt.
The Aurora shooting victims
Just like when the senator got shot that time.they want to reduce ammo.
That's all the news is talking about how James holmes got his guns. Why? What for? He did it the LEGAL way.
And was NOT a criminal at all till he carried out this crime at the Movie Theater.
Remember guns don't kill! It's the people behind the gun that do.
I'm a gun owner and I should have the right to protect my precious life from thugs and criminals.
But the law only allows me to keep my gun in the house for protection
Think about it! If we were allowed to carry guns maybe it would have been only one dead and one injured
Because some one caring there gun would have blown his head off before another innocent sole could have been harmed.
Lets talk about the lives lost, who they were , what they lived for, ect ( NOT GUNS )
My question to the gun advocates is why do you need a semiautomatic with a large magazine? What can we eliminate that will allow more people to be safe from such casualties and still allow you to have pleasure in your target challenges, hunting, and personal safety?
There is an answer that the NRA can move toward. The status quo is unacceptable in this modern time.
14FREEK This A$$WIPE Must not have ever used a Semi-Auto before, or he should have been able to clear the jam in less tht 10 seconds, AM SURE GLAD HE COULDN"T, but just sayin he should have been able.
Clearing a jam is something that anyone with some practical and knowledgeable use of the gun should be able to perform in a matter of seconds.
If the theater policy is that you can not enjoy your 2nd amendment rights in their theater then shouldn't the theater be responsible for those rights whereby properly licensed citizens could have protected themselves and the other patrons as well?
CCW holders are like Air Marshals when you fly only they are volunteers. For the theater to prohibit this avenue of security is wrong And I say it therefore leaves them liable for the responsibility of their patrons safety.