AP/ July 17, 2012, 12:23 PM

Boy Scouts decide to keep banning gay members

CBS/iStockphoto

(AP) NEW YORK - After a confidential two-year review, the Boy Scouts of America on Tuesday emphatically reaffirmed its policy of excluding gays, ruling out any changes despite relentless protest campaigns by some critics.

An 11-member special committee, formed discreetly by top Scout leaders in 2010, "came to the conclusion that this policy is absolutely the best policy for the Boy Scouts," the organization' national spokesman, Deron Smith, told The Associated Press.

Smith said the committee, comprised of professional scout executives and adult volunteers, was unanimous in its conclusion — preserving a long-standing policy that was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2000 and has remained controversial ever since.

Boy Scouts' "perversion files" ordered released

As a result of the committee's decision, the Scouts' national executive board will take no further action on a recently submitted resolution asking for reconsideration of the membership policy.

The Scouts' chief executive, Bob Mazzuca, contended that most Scout families support the policy, which applies to both leaders and Scouts.

"The vast majority of the parents of youth we serve value their right to address issues of same-sex orientation within their family, with spiritual advisers and at the appropriate time and in the right setting," Mazzuca said. "We fully understand that no single policy will accommodate the many diverse views among our membership or society."

The president of the largest U.S. gay-rights group, Chad Griffin of the Human Rights Campaign, depicted the Scouts' decision as "a missed opportunity of colossal proportions."

"With the country moving toward inclusion, the leaders of the Boy Scouts of America have instead sent a message to young people that only some of them are valued," he said. "They've chosen to teach division and intolerance."

The Scouts did not identify the members of the special committee that studied the issue, but said in a statement that they represented "a diversity of perspectives and opinions."

"The review included forthright and candid conversation and extensive research and evaluations — both from within Scouting and from outside of the organization," the statement said.

The announcement suggests that hurdles may be high for a couple of members of the national executive board — Ernst & Young CEO James Turley and AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson — who have recently indicated they would try to work from within to change the policy. Both of their companies have been commended by gay-rights groups for gay-friendly employment policies.

Stephenson is on track to become president of the Scouts' national board in 2014, and will likely face continued pressure from gay-rights groups to try to end the exclusion policy. Asked for comment on Tuesday about the Scouts' decision to keep the policy, AT&T did not refer to Stephenson's situation specifically.

"We don't agree with every policy of every organization we support, nor would we expect them to agree with us on everything," the company said. "Our belief is that change at any organization must come from within to be successful and sustainable."

A statement from the executive committee of the Scouts' national executive board alluded to the Turley-Stephenson developments.

"Scouting believes that good people can personally disagree on this topic and still work together to achieve the life-changing benefits to youth through Scouting," the statement said. "While not all board members may personally agree with this policy, and may choose a different direction for their own organizations, BSA leadership agrees this is the best policy for the organization."

Since 2000, the Boy Scouts have been targeted with numerous protest campaigns and run afoul of some local nondiscrimination laws because of the membership policy.

One ongoing protest campaign involves Jennifer Tyrrell, the Ohio mother of a 7-year-old Cub Scout who was ousted as a Scout den mother because she is lesbian.

Change.org, an online forum supporting activist causes, says more than 300,000 people have signed its petition urging the Scouts to reinstate Tyrrell and abandon the exclusion policy. The petition is to be delivered to the Scouts' national headquarters in Irving, Texas, on Wednesday.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
382 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Brownie1455 says:
I have a question. Is homosexuality no longer considered a sin? And if not, by whom? Because as I last remember, God, who created us and whether some believe in him or not, said that anything done sexually outside of a marriage between one man and one woman is considered sin (i.e. fornication, adultery, beastiality, homosexuality, and incest). My next question is and no one has answered this question from the many threads that asked is "why don't the gays create their own BSA organization for the gays scouts and their scout leaders and for whoever else wants to join?" This way they can make up their own rules. Also again, what is the urgency to infiltrate the BSA? Is it truly just for being a Boy Scout and the life lessons learned as a scout or is it to influence the younger minds to accept a lifestyle as normal when they know it is totally contrary to God's word. Let's be real. Young people are influenced by those things around them and we know that. We know today that the culture of homosexuality is more accepted among the younger generation then the older generation. Why, because it is more open. But, because it is more open, does it make it right? If you truly look at it the spread of AIDs, HIV, and other sexual diseases are more prevalent among this lifestyle. We know that in the Black community that Black women (heterosexuals) have a high HIV rate from their mates (from the down low brothers). But with proper medication, the numbers are holding steady, but still high. Let's face it, God did not create man and man, or woman and woman for each other, but man and a woman as his help mate. The reason that homosexuality has been in the closet for so long is because they know its wrong. At first you all said that you just want to do whatever you want behind closed doors which was your business and that's fine, but when you try to say that everyone should accept your sinful lifestyle and then you become upset or try to sue someone or boycott a business if one does not accept it or if anyone speaks out against it you become upset and they have to apologize and take sensitivity classes, but you can say whatever you want with no repercussions, that is wrong. We know the reasons so many hate the so-called right wing and call us bigots, it is because we stand up for God and his beliefs. People, there are grave consequences to our actions when it is out of the will of God and if we think we can continue to live wickedly in this world without any consequences we are wrong, because there are always consequences to disobedience.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cleric77 says:
Praise God! That our BSA didn't fall for the myths of our secular amoral public media which support the national homosexual movement's agenda
attempting to destroy our traditional Biblical morals and values in the area of seual morality. PTL!
Three main studies are cited by "gay rights" activists in support of their argument2—Hamer's X-chromosome research, LeVay's study of the hypothalamus, and Bailey and Pillard's study of identical twins who were homosexuals. In all three cases, the researchers had a vested interest in obtaining a certain outcome because they were homosexuals themselves. More importantly, their studies did not stand up to scientific scrutiny by other researchers. Also, "the media typically do not explain the methodological flaws in these studies, and they typically oversimplify the results." There is no reliable evidence to date that homosexual behaviour is determined by a person's genes.

To the extent that biological or social factors may contribute to a person's bent toward homosexual behaviour, this does not excuse it. Some people have a strong bent towards stealing or abuse of alcohol, but they still choose to engage or not engage in this behaviour—the law rightly holds them accountable.

The final report of the BUWA task force states "that a person becomes a homosexual ultimately by choosing to be involved in same-sex activity . . . . This is in contrast to innate characteristics such as gender and ethnicity."7 The report affirms that "the Bible is clear that sin involves choice, and it unequivocally condemns homosexual behaviour as sin."
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AttyFAM says:
by krotec54 July 18, 2012 10:44 PM EDT
It has been noted that gay activists at the time adopted many of Szasz's arguments against the psychiatric system, but also that Szasz had written in 1965 that: "I believe it is very likely that homosexuality is, indeed, a disease in the second sense [expression of psychosexual immaturity] and perhaps sometimes even in the stricter sense [a condition somewhat similar to ordinary organic maladies].
------------------------------------------------------------

Thomas Szasz said a lot of things. That does not make him right. He advocated that there should be no defense of mental illness in criminal cases. The courts have emphatically rejected that view. And a lot has happened in medicine since Szasz wrote 47 years ago. As I said elsewhere, there is strong evidence that sexual orientation has a lot to do with the progesterone level in the mother during gestation. That means it is not a birth defect, it is simply one of several expected outcomes that may occur from a pregnancy.
reply
krotec54 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Not true, you have no proof. If you want to compare mothers that drink alcohol and smoke cigarettes during gestation there will have several expected outcomes that do occur from a pregnancy but not much evidence that sexual orientation has anything to do with progesterone level.
As for your man Thomas Szasz, it was his groups that open the doors for the affliction of psychosexual immaturity to roam freely among the population, if it were not for him the gays would still be in the Asylum for theirs and our protection.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rightontarget says:
by krotec54 July 19, 2012 8:44 PM EDT
Rightontarget, if you look at history with the Spartans, the downfall was that they did not leave a child to replace them. It was never encouraged or tolerated for centuries. If you read my previous post about Gays, they were identify as C. The Boy Scouts encouraged self-confidence to mature and to take responsibility of their future. America should not be forced to verify who is gay and who is not, just to get special treatment from the government, It's not fair for the rest of the country to be handicapped by immaturity.
***************************************************

So, your fear is that everybody will turn gay and leave no children to replace them??? Seriously??? (How stupid is that!!) All becuse of lack of discrimination against them?? That's B.S.!! The gay community poses no threat whatsoever to the human race. Many adopt or have children. Our population is not being threatened in any way. They just want to be able to choose who they love and live with themselves without haveing such things dictated to them by a bunch of selfrighteous jerks who think they can decide what is "acceptable" or "normal" for society. (Sooner or later they will figure out that they don't have that kind of power.) Being gay was "identified" "as an expression of psychosexual immaturity"?? WHO CARES? So that doesn't mean they were "identified" CORRECTLY! That was just somebody's opinion at the time. TIMES CHANGE! It seems to me that the gay community is beginning to "take responsibility of their future" by speaking out and working to achieve equality. This affects nobody except for those who want to control other's lives in order to maintain their OWN version of what THEY think society "should" be. (control freaks)
reply
krotec54 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You do sound like a control freak imposing your version of what you think society should accept as normal.
rightontarget replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Don't really care what society should accept as normal. It's not up to me to say what anybody else "should" do. Unlike some other people who want to control what everybody else does and how they think. You are entitled to think as you like and so am I.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AttyFAM says:
by krotec54 July 19, 2012 8:44 PM EDT
Rightontarget, if you look at history with the Spartans, the downfall was that they did not leave a child to replace them. It was never encouraged or tolerated for centuries.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Your fantasies about Greek history are as far fetched as your fantasies about gays and lesbians. First, Sparta had a problem in its social structure. Citizenship was inherited by blood. Thus the Helots, who formed the lower class, were disenfranchised and disaffected as they could never become citizens and have the rights of citizens. Second, in a war with Thebes in 371 BCE, Sparta lost a huge battle at Leuctra. It never recovered militarily or economically from this disaster. Thebes became the dominant power (over Sparta and other city-states) until Philip II of Macedon swept in and conquered all. Sparta held on a for a few more centuries, but its raison d'etre was gone and eventually successive Helot revolts took their toll and the city collapsed.

Try to keep to reality, please.
reply
krotec54 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AttyFAM, What does "Citizenship inherited by blood" mean? Let's look at Japan or China; all of their citizens are inherited by blood, they do not allow immigration of any class, or mix marriage, but they had problems with its social structure, plenty of wars, and yet they flourish, what caused the cessation of the bloodline for Spartans? Why did the Spartans lose their reason for existence? Will we have a reason for existence?
AttyFAM replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
So ignore what I wrote. I am not going to repeat it.
But let me put it this way. Leadville, Colorado in 1880 had a population of 40,000 people. Now it has about 2,600. The "bloodline" did not run out. The economic reason for its boom ran out. Now Sparta had no port, no industry, nothing but its military. When that was defeated by the Thebans, and more so when the Macedonians became the military power of Greece, Sparta could not exist by being the military strong man and it had no other means of supports. So it slowly died as did the ghost towns of the American west.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rightontarget says:
WARNING: THE FOLLOWING IS TOTAL AND COMPLETE B.S.

by krotec54 July 18, 2012 8:59 PM EDT
They were entertainers and individuals with mental disorders, they were never given the status as being highly accepted, it was shamed but tolerated, they did not push for any special demands or desire to work with kids, it was a hush, kept in the closet and nobody care to talk about their problem out of respect for their affliction. The insane asylum was not fully supported by the government, most families paid for the treatment, not everyone had the money to put a family member in for treatment, one of the reasons why the asylums were closed Now, with the demands to redefine marriage and the in your face I have a right to be with your kids, has built an animosity towards those that feel they have the freedom to recruit the weak minded youth to a cessation in life with the alternative lifestyle. This is the opposite of what was intended for this country.
**********************************************

OMG!!!! If anybody belings in an "insane asylum", it's YOU!!! Good Grief!!!!! Being gay is an "affliction" and they belong in an "asylum"??? And they "feel they have the freedom to recruit the weak minded youth to a cessation in life with the alternative lifestyle". Really????? They are "recruting" people to their lifestyle. OMG!!!! Go back on your meds!!!! (or at least have the dosage increased) Those voices in your head are waaaaaaaaaaaaay too loud! LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
reply
krotec54 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Please, take the time to research at the library, talk to your grandma, anyone over 60 years old, and Google asylums.
rightontarget replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Look Krotrec, I'm not saying that what you stated is not TRUE. That DID happen but it was as nutty a way of treating gay people back then as those are who agree with that way of thinking today.
Yes, people used to have some very unreasonable and crazy preceptions back in the day. At least we are able to LEARN from history how NOT to act. People used to be put in "asylums" for all kinds of bogus reasons. Still doesn't make it ok!!!!!!!
See all 4 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
grendel007 says:
I have only one question that, if it is ever answered, may change my opinion on this issue. It is this- Can someone please explain to me the normative quality of homosexuality? It has no biological impetus, no religious position, no familial and societal benefit, and no evolutionary advantage. This leads me to the conclusion that it is a genetic defect or an aberrant life-choice.
reply
krotec54 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Well, there is no normative quality of homosexuals; it is not a genetic defect, but a psychosexual immaturity and perhaps more of an aberrant life-choice hoping to get government subsidy and special privileges for their new classification.
rightontarget replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
What the He11 is "normative quality"??? Really??? Did you just pull that one out of a hat??? "Normalcy" is all about PRECEPTION. Just who exactly is homosexuality supposed to be "normal" for anyway??? Jeez...... It's "normal" in Africa for people to live in huts and carry water in jugs on their heads. Get over yourself. Years ago it used to be "normal" for women to ride horses "side saddle" and was considered "abnormal" for them to straddle a horse like a man. Interracial marriage was "abnormal". Woman working outside of the home or holding jobs that were considered only for men was "abnormal". Good grief! NOBODY CARES what your version of "normal" is. I think that any PRIVATE club, organization, church or whatever should be forced to "accept" anyone into their membership. They have the right to DISCRIMINATE against anyone by race, gender, sexual preference, even the color of their hair if they want to. People should KNOW what they DISCRIMINATE against so they can make informed choices on what group, organization, church or whatever they CHOOSE to support or join. So the Boy Scouts won't "allow" gays in their precious little group. WHO CARES!!!!! Gay people, get over it. There are many MORE IMPORTANT issues that you should concentrate your efforts on.
See all 4 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AttyFAM says:
by krotec54 July 18, 2012 1:37 PM EDT
Ultraskygod, I am from the Show Me State. Gays were never allowed in the military in America, it was not gentlemen like as a soldier to act that way towards another male. Gays were place in asylums for their protection until the 1960's when some doctors that could not find the cause of this illness claimed that it is not a threat to him or herself or society. Now we see the true effects of what it has created between the sane and the insane.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is getting absurd. A man who apparently speaks English as his native language (he is from Missouri after all) but is unable to put together an English sentence in any of his posts undertakes to tell the rest of America what is what.

Krotec, did you enjoy the movie West Side Story or Cabaret? How about the paintings of Van Gogh or Gauguin, or the plays A Streetcar Named Desire or Cat on a Hot Tin Roof? Or even Moby Dick, or Walt Whitman's O Captain, My Captain?

The three men who collaborated to create lyrics and songs and dances for one of the loveliest dramas of heterosexual love (West Side Story, in case you did not get it) were all gay. The artists, playwrights and authors I mentioned - and many, many more - are all gay, even Herman Melville, author of the quintessential American novel, was gay. This is all far, far from your fantasy of them being locked up in insane asylums. J. Edgar Hoover was as gay as they come and he led the FBI for thirty odd years.

Visit reality some day. It is very interesting.
reply
krotec54 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
They were entertainers and individuals with mental disorders, they were never given the status as being highly accepted, it was shamed but tolerated, they did not push for any special demands or desire to work with kids, it was a hush, kept in the closet and nobody care to talk about their problem out of respect for their affliction. The insane asylum was not fully supported by the government, most families paid for the treatment, not everyone had the money to put a family member in for treatment, one of the reasons why the asylums were closed Now, with the demands to redefine marriage and the in your face I have a right to be with your kids, has built an animosity towards those that feel they have the freedom to recruit the weak minded youth to a cessation in life with the alternative lifestyle. This is the opposite of what was intended for this country.
rightontarget replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
That's exactly what I mean by the "Better Than" mindset. I think that this mindset is a "mental disorder" all of it's own!!!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AttyFAM says:
by krotec54 July 18, 2012 11:35 AM EDT
Gays and pedophiles are in the same class as "abnormal behaviors".
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You just don't get it. The DSM, the world standard or mental and emotional disorders, does not classify homosexual orientation as abnormal. Pedophilia, however, is classified as a sexual disorder and has the code designation 302.2. The definition requires a male older than the child by at least five years and the child being prepubescent.

What is wrong with so many of you that you do not understand the enormous difference between being gay or lesbian and being a pedophile?
reply
krotec54 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The American Psychiatric Association membership (following a unanimous vote by the trustees in 1973) voted by a small majority (58%) to remove it as an illness category from the DSM, replacing it with a category of "sexual orientation disturbance" and then "ego-dystonic homosexuality," which was deleted in 1987, although "gender identity disorder" and a wide variety of "paraphilias" remain. It has been noted that gay activists at the time adopted many of Szasz's arguments against the psychiatric system, but also that Szasz had written in 1965 that: "I believe it is very likely that homosexuality is, indeed, a disease in the second sense [expression of psychosexual immaturity] and perhaps sometimes even in the stricter sense [a condition somewhat similar to ordinary organic maladies].
krotec54 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
In 1890, the term was used in a medical dictionary as an adjective to describe tribadism (as "Lesbian love"): sexual gratification of two women by simulating intercourse. "Lesbianism" to describe erotic relationships between women had been documented in 1870. The terms were interchangeable with "Sapphist" and "Sapphism" around the turn of the 20th century. The use of "Lesbian" in medical literature became prominent; by 1925, the word was recorded as a noun to mean the female equivalent of a sodomite.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AttyFAM says:
by stevehads July 18, 2012 9:25 AM EDT
The Boy Scouts of America believes that a scout has responsibility to first his god, next his country (the USA), and then his family. Religion is a major part of the mentality of boy scouts. Homosexuality is clearly against most, if not all major religions. If you don't like it, you shouldn't have anything to do with the BSA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Sexual orientation and religious interest are totally unrelated. Now, two major religions - Christianity and Islam - may be hostile to gays and lesbians, but that does not make the reverse true.
reply
grendel007 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
How can two major religions be against homosexual acts and include prohibitions from engaging in them in their scriptures and there be no relation between "Sexual orientation and religious interest"?
krotec54 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Most would have no interest to attend religious groups hostile towards their sexual orientation.
See all 382 Comments