AP/ July 13, 2012, 7:34 AM

Nonprofit Voter Participation Center sends election registration docs to dogs, dead people

Brenda Charlston holds a photo of her long-deceased dog, Rosie, and a voter registration form for "Rosie Charlston" that arrived in the mail for the canine last month, in Seattle, July 11, 2012.

Brenda Charlston holds a photo of her long-deceased dog, Rosie, and a voter registration form for "Rosie Charlston" that arrived in the mail for the canine last month, in Seattle, July 11, 2012. / AP

(AP) OLYMPIA, Wash. - The voter registration form arrived in the mail last month with some key information already filled in: Rosie Charlston's name was complete, as was her Seattle address.

Problem is, Rosie was a black lab who died in 1998.

A group called the Voter Participation Center has touted the distribution of some 5 million registration forms in recent weeks, targeting Democratic-leaning voting blocs such as unmarried women, African-Americans, Latinos and young adults.

But residents and election administrators around the country also have reported a series of bizarre and questionable mailings addressed to animals, dead people, noncitizens and people already registered to vote.

Tough ID laws could block thousands of voters
GOP Michigan gov. vetoes voter ID laws
New lawsuit challenges Florida voter purge

Brenda Charlston wasn't the only person to get documents for her pet: A Virginia man said similar documents arrived for his dead dog, Mozart, while a woman in the state got forms for her cat, Scampers.

"On a serious note, I think it's tampering with our voting system," Charlston said. "They're fishing for votes: That's how I view it."

Every presidential election cycle brings with it a variety of registration drives targeting people who typically are underrepresented at the polls, and Republicans have long seized on sloppy or questionable registrations as a sign of potential fraud on the part of Democrats.

It's an issue that is particularly sensitive this year GOP political leaders have used fears of fraud to successfully push laws across the country that could make voting more difficult by requiring voters to show identification. Democrats have fought the laws, arguing that they can disenfranchise citizens, minorities in particular.

The group at the root of the questionable mailings — the Voter Participation Center — acknowledges that the databases it uses to contact possible voters are imperfect because they are developed from commercially collected information. The group also says it expects people who receive misdirected mail to simply throw it away.

Several election officials said they believed the voter registration systems were secure enough to catch people who might improperly submit the misdirected documents.

But administrators in New Mexico, a potential swing state in the 2012 presidential race, warned that ineligible voters who complete the documents could make it onto the rolls.

New Mexico is one of two states in which noncitizens can qualify for a driver's license by simply proving residency — not necessarily legal residency — and state elections officials have no way of verifying the legal status of those who file registration documents.

Ken Ortiz, the chief of staff at the New Mexico secretary of state's office, said some noncitizens have contacted the state asking why they received the forms when they'd previously been told that they could not vote.

"We fear that some of these individuals who receive this mailing may feel that they are being encouraged to vote by our office or county government," Ortiz said.

The mailings appear official, arriving in privacy envelopes with the headline "VOTER REGISTRATION DOCUMENTS ENCLOSED." Some information is already completed on the voter registration papers, and recipients also get an envelope to send completed forms to local elections officials.


1/2

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
34 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
alphaa10000 says:
THE LATEST GOP SCANDAL-- CHARGES OF VOTER FRAUD

sw59404 said, "... The poor, elderly, minorities, illegals are not disenfranchised as the left claims. If voting is important enough to anyone, they will make the attempt to vote. Those that don't register don't care enough to make the attempt, so why should we pander?"
---

"Pander"? Voting is a right, and every effort should be made to make voting accessible-- even easy-- for every voter. That is the idea that brought about absentee registration and voting, and surely you experienced few misgivings about that measure.

Because voting is a right, perhaps you also were opposed to the Jim Crow poll tax and literacy tests that illegally but effectively excluded black voters.

But other, more subtle obstacles also lie in the path of a would-be voter. To presume that registration and voting depends on only proper motivation is not entirely correct. Voter registration depends on also having correct information. Not everyone has adequate information sources, and may not make correct decisions about registration and voting, both of which are detailed, rule-based processes.

For example, whether a registered voter is informed about new requirements for a voter ID may depend on local practices. Sometimes, the news is widely distributed in media, but often it is not. If a prospective voter does not receive a newspaper, he may miss the news until too late to vote. Entirely too many factors can limit a citizen's participation, and are used for that purpose by administrations hostile to voters of the opposite party.

The US DOJ found Florida's GOP administration already purging rolls of many voters who were, in fact, properly registered. The Florida process was both heedless of voter rights and interests, and was riddled with inconsistencies and errors, creating ample justification for the DOJ action.

But the GOP action in Florida merely continues its decade-long campaign nationally to raise the false cry of "Voter Fraud!" to impose rules, practices and restrictions that effectively exclude voters likely to be of the opposition party. This, in itself, is partisan abuse of power and should be halted everywhere as the illegal action it is.

You should be overjoyed that efforts are made to bring in all citizens into self-government, even if all voters do not share your beliefs. Even so, the United States has a scandalously low voter turnout compared to other nations. Any country, including ours, where legions of citizens are disqualified from voting sets the stage for a tyranny of the elite-- the well-educated with property and connections. This was exactly the kind of tyranny that was the basis for the American revolution, where patriots charged they were denied the rights of Englishmen.

As for possible fraud, the article makes clear that voter registration information is commercially available and can be misused for non-official purposes by any third party-- GOP or Democrat. In many states, actual voter registration rolls are freely and publicly available.

The extent of any national voter fraud problem? New York University's Brennan Center for Justice concluded in a 2007 report, "... by any measure, voter fraud is extraordinarily rare."

Contrast that finding with the appearance of a legislative package from the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), an organization which promotes GOP policy among state legislatures. The ALEC package is, in fact, a handy toolkit of voter restrictions and sample legistation for states where GOP governors and GOP legislatures enjoy control, and want to keep it that way.

Your state may be one of them. The Brennan Center describes the various measures now used to restrict voter participation-- (1) an end to registration on election day, (2) sharply restricted early voting, (3) laws which require citizenship papers, (4) laws restricting student voting and (5) rules for organizers of voter registration drives that are extremely difficult to follow.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CarsonCitySteve says:
How can anyone, honestly, make this into a political bouncing ball? Trying to intice dogs and cats to vote? Trying to intice the uniformed to vote? Trying to intice the apathetic to vote? Are these really the people you want deciding your representatives? This is insane. I'd rather go back to the days of old, where only land owners could vote, at least they have a real stake in the outcome. (Yes, I know, women and blacks couldn't vote then either. That's not the point. I don't want people who couldn't care less deciding elections.)
reply
sw59404 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Amen. The poor, elderly, minorities, illegals are not disenfranchised as the left claims. If voting is important enough to anyone, they will make the attempt to vote. Those that don't register don't care enough to make the attempt, so why should we pander? It is bad enough roughly 70% of the electorate vote without knowing the real issues or even know the real backgrounds of the people they are told to vote for. We are cheapening the election process as we continue to dumb down America.
alphaa10000 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CarsonCitySteve said, "... This is insane. I'd rather go back to the days of old, where only land owners could vote, at least they have a real stake in the outcome. (Yes, I know, women and blacks couldn't vote then either. That's not the point. I don't want people who couldn't care less deciding elections.)"
---

But that is precisely the point-- the landed gentry do not care about anybody except their own profits and holdings. Why should they decide elections?

After all, you learned in history class that denial of electoral franchise and political rights was much of the basis for the American revolution.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
euge005 says:
I would expect that a number of these cases are manufacterd by the cronies of the GOP to make the appearance of a problem where none exists. This is a very thinly veiled effort to justify the racist pruning of polls to defeat the candidates of the 99% by the sold out minnions of the 1%.
reply
audemus replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The Republicans wouldn't do that....everyone knows they are the party of Truth, Justice, and The American Way....
joule18 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You recally believe that crap? Nothing wrong with pruning the polls from dead people, pets, and illegals. But, you apparently believe "anything for the win." Wake up!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Kaelinda1 says:
In order to get a state ID card (I'm a non-driver), I had to present a certified copy of my birth certificate, two proofs of residency, my social security card, original or certified copies of marriage certificates and divorce decrees. I took my voter's registration card with me because it was in the same storage envelope.

I had to do all this 5 years ago when I renewed my ID. Why did I have to do it all over again this year? Because NOW they scan the information into some mysterious state database. Or maybe it's a national database. But it's clear now, that the state knows all about you if you want a state ID or driver's license.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
thechooch1 says:
Does anyone think a dog is going to be allowed to vote? Back during the last failed administration they investigated voter fraud. Of the millions and millions of votes cast, they found a whopping 87 cases of POSSIBLE voter fraud. Talk about a red herring!
reply
barko78 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Where I live, when you go to vote all they ask you is your address. So, If someone has registered my dog and they know my address. Easy fraud. Every time I vote I think how weird it is that don't ask for ID
linkicon reporticon emailicon
thetruthwillout says:
I have had to present my driver's license every time I've voted, so I don't understand why providing identification is a problem, and I'm a Democrat.
reply
catmomtx replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
And a lot of elderly people who have voted in the same preceint the same way you have actornaught will now be asked to produce "acceptable government issued ID". Many of them no longer have access to the documents people are having to show in order to get the "government issued ID" because of the new Homeland Security rules. It's not showing ID that is the problem, it is having and showing "acceptable government issued ID " that is the problem.

I think it is interesting that Republicans didn't demand that the same government issued ID or any of the other changes be enforced during the Republican primaries earlier this year, and they had numerous problems with vote counts and other issues! In fact this was never even an issue during the primaries. I also wonder after the debacle in the 2000 elections why Republicans weren't whining about voter fraud and changing the rules then. No, they waited until four months before the next Presidential election to set rules to keep whay all the experts say will affect minority, poor, the elderly and students who generally vote Democratic from being able to vote. Republicans are so desparate that they are resorting to cheating.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
john92021 says:
Don't stop at voting, see how many dead dogs have jobs, unemployment, disability and medicare benefits.
reply
55minus5 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Very interesting.
euge005 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Only fair, they contribute more to this country than the Tea Party GOP members of the House have.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CaptainSmollett says:
Exactly why we need stricter voter registration laws. Dead dogs should have difficulty getting a valid photo ID.
reply
55minus5 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Captain, I have a voter registration checked every year and show my ID when I come to vote. A perfect order works well. Of course strict voter registration laws are absolutely necessary. I don't understand all that cry about illegals if they cannot put this straight.
catmomtx replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Did you ever consider that Republicans may be manufacturing this because they were unable to produce examples before?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
55minus5 says:
"Republicans have long seized on sloppy or questionable registrations as a sign of potential fraud on the part of Democrats."
---- Well, here we go.

This is too crazy to be serious. It can't be taken for a face value.
This is a smear campaign. A propagandist trick.
We know, Hitler declared that "The Communists burned the Reichstag" although he staged it and seized the power.
This is the Fifth Column in action if not a bizarre joke.
Remember the white powder in mail? Something else now.
reply
barko78 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
How do you know so much about Republicans. Can I ask where you get your information?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ticobird says:
Absolutely disgusting. This is why we need to defend the US voting process. By the way, didn't the reporter have enough information or concern to state how the Voter Participation Center is funded?
reply
55minus5 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I don't understand all that anxiety. We have ID checking and regular address verifying in our state, and that works perfectly.
See all 34 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right