Penn State trustees: "We are accountable"
(CBS/AP) PHILADELPHIA - The chairwoman of Penn State's board of trustees says the panel "accepts full responsibility for the failures that occurred" in the Jerry Sandusky sex abuse scandal.
Karen Peetz and other board members pledged to make changes to ensure similar abuse can't go on unchecked in the future. They say the board failed to ask tough questions about Sandusky.
The board-sanctioned investigation into the scandal concluded that Hall of Fame coach Joe Paterno and other senior school officials "concealed critical facts relating to Sandusky's child abuse" because they were worried about bad publicity.
A 267-page report is the result of an eight-month inquiry by former FBI director Louis Freeh.
Penn State probe condemns "callous disregard"
Inside Penn State's decision not to report Sandusky abuse
Freeh: Paterno failed in "actions and words"
Sandusky is awaiting sentencing after being convicted of 45 criminal counts.
Kenneth Frazier, who led the Penn State board of trustees' investigation, called Freeh's report "both sad and sobering."
Jerry Sandusky gets 30 to 60 years in prison
"We are accountable for what's happened here," Frazier said, adding that the board "did not force the issue" after initially learning of the sex abuse allegations.
Frazier added that "we have to take some time ... before we start thinking about how we think about Joe Paterno's entire life and entire body of work." Penn State President Rodney Erickson said the university is taking steps to address the "most painful chapter" in the school's history.Popular on CBSNews.com
- TWA Flight 800 gets another look 17 years later 108 Comments
- America's endangered historic places 11 Photos
- FBI: No sign of Jimmy Hoffa's body in Detroit suburb
- Reporter Michael Hastings dies at 33
- Serena Williams sorry for "what I supposedly said" on rape
- TWA Flight 800 disaster - a look back 19 Photos
- Taliban: We killed 4 U.S. troops at Afghan air base
- Scientists say shipwreck timber in Lake Michigan centuries old















The Second Mile program, and indeed all programs that deal with the welfare of others (including universities) should be constantly scrutinized and kept safe from predators and the like. These are axioms and I can't see how they could be up for debate.
But unless it can be shown that Penn State University was knowingly negligent in its duties to protect it students and those under its charge, I would think that the 96,000 plus students and faculty, who had no idea of the crimes being perpetrated, have suffered enough.
Penn State is a fine university with a long and heretofore honorable past. Disbanding the football team or otherwise punishing the vast majority of innocent people in order to wreak some sort of blind vengeance is not the answer.
I am not, I repeat NOT an alum of Penn State. I would root against them if they played my alma mater, or any other team in the Big 12. But that only goes as far as the score board. Penn State is filled with over 96,000 honorable students and faculty. To want to destroy it would be a crime.
And I don't often swear.
Cause vs symptom - government entities can be bought and paid for (often by large corporations), and unions usually look out solely for the members' livelihoods within (assuming there are no corrupt leadership members within). Which is one reason unions are not well-liked. They talk only of themselves, assuming that everybody watching them automatically relates (and we understandably don't)...
But nitpicking aside, you're not wrong. There's plenty of corruption everywhere, it seems...
Resignation is the start of the process where justice is the desired outcome. Not the end of it...