Wildfire-fighting C-130s grounded after deadly crash

In this July 2, 2011 photo provided by the North Carolina National Guard, a crew prepares a C-130 MAFFS 7 (Modular Airborne FireFighting System) cargo plane to battle a wildfire, in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Officials on Monday, July 2, 2012, said a C-130 MAFFS based out of North Carolina has crashed while fighting wildfires in South Dakota. / Michael Wilber,AP Photo/North Carolina Air National Guard
(CBS/AP) COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. - The deadly crash of a military cargo plane fighting a South Dakota wildfire forced officials to ground seven other Air Force air tankers, removing critical firefighting aircraft from the skies during one of the busiest and most destructive wildfire seasons ever to hit the West.
The C-130 from an Air National Guard wing based in Charlotte, N.C., was carrying a crew of six and fighting a 6.5-square-mile blaze in the Black Hills of South Dakota when it crashed Sunday, killing at least one crew member and injuring others.
Amid ruins of burned-out homes, precious keepsakes
Colorado wildfires may stomp out fireworks
Obama on Colorado wildfires: "Devastation is enormous"
Watch: Firefighters gain ground on Western wildfires
President Barack Obama offered thoughts and prayers to the crew and their families. "The men and women battling these terrible fires across the West put their lives on the line every day for their fellow Americans," he said in a statement.
"They are heroes who deserve the appreciation of a grateful nation," the statement also said.
The crash cut the number of large air tankers fighting this summer's outbreak of wildfires by one-third.
The military put the remaining seven C-130s on an "operational hold," keeping them on the ground indefinitely. That left 14 federally contracted heavy tankers available until investigators gain a better understanding of what caused the crash.
"You've basically lopped off eight air tankers immediately from your inventory, and that's going to make it tougher to fight wildfires," said Mike Archer, who distributes a daily newsletter of wildfire news.
"And who knows how long the planes will be down?" he said, adding that investigators will take time to make their conclusions.
A privately owned civilian version of an older-model C-130 has crashed on firefighting duty before. In 2002, three crew members were killed when their C-130A air tanker crashed in California. The plane broke up in flight and an investigation blamed fatigue cracks in the wings.
The crash, in part, prompted a review of the airworthiness of large U.S. air tankers and led ultimately to a greatly reduced fleet of large civilian tanker planes. The 44 planes in the fleet a decade ago has dwindled to nine being flown on U.S. Forest Service exclusive use contracts right now.
Western wildfires
A military spokesman said he did not know when the grounded planes would resume firefighting flights.
U.S. Forest Service officials said they weren't immediately prepared to comment on whether they have enough aerial firefighting assets without the C-130s. The military planes were filling up with fire retardant and flying out of Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado Springs.
They were used to fight fires in Colorado, Wyoming, Montana and South Dakota.
The plane that crashed was fighting a fire about 80 miles southwest of Rapid City, S.D. The terrain of the crash site is "very, very rugged, straight up and straight down cliffs," said Frank Maynard, the Fall River County emergency management director.
Military officials declined to say whether anyone was killed, but they confirmed there were some crew members who were being treated for serious injuries at a hospital in Rapid City.
Watch the video below for updates on the wildfire damage from Colorado Springs.The family of Lt. Col. Paul Mikeal of Mooresville, N.C., said they were told early Monday that he had died in the crash They said he was a 42-year-old married father of two and a veteran of deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan.
"There were lives lost," Lt. Col. Robert Carver of the North Carolina National Guard said at a news conference. "We are very grateful for the survivors and our thoughts and prayers and hearts go out to the families that have lost loved ones."
The C-130s can be loaded with a device called the Modular Airborne Firefighting System, or MAFFS. The system can drop 3,000 gallons of water or fire retardant within seconds through a modified side door toward the rear of the plane.
Obama signed a bill last month hastening the addition of seven large tanker planes to the nation's rundown aerial firefighting fleet, at a cost of $24 million, but the first planes won't be available until mid-August.
It's been seven weeks since the first blazes started and slowly spread to surrounding states, destroying hundreds of homes and forcing thousands to evacuate. For many families who have returned home, there is not much more left than ashes.
One of the worst is the Waldo Canyon fire in Colorado Springs. Resident Wayne Selting told "CBS This Morning" he "could see the fire come over the top of the ridge (by his home) ... and within a period of about six minutes, it went from the top of the ridge almost down to the neighborhood."- no previous page
- next
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Port Authority releases photo of One WTC workers at dizzying heights 140 Comments
- Thousands of U.S. bridges vulnerable to collapse
- Massive train collision takes down highway overpass
- Washington state bridge collapses 20 Photos
- Texas flooding turns deadly
- Best U.S. beaches 2013 10 Photos
- Missouri train derailment 10 Photos
- Bridge collapse blamed on tractor-trailer 330 Comments
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- Love when the peanut gallery chimes in, and displays a complete lack of knowledge or experience in the subject at hand. RIP to those who passed. Best wishes to the survivors, and all family and friends involved.
- reply
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- The crash may be due to improper maintenance or some variant modification and (as much as I hate to say it) operator error but the C 130 has been flying since the mid 1950s in dozens of roles and is still in heavy use by the military, civilian and in other countries today and with a very low accident rate. I guess the upshot is that I feel grounding the planes is, in this case, a bad move considering how badly they are needed.
- reply
-
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- Nice uneducated guess but you are probably totally off base. I flew KC 130's in Vietnam and was the squadron Quality Assurance officer in the aircraft maintenance department...I know a bit about these vintage c 130's. These Air National Guard planes are the oldest in the fleet and are handed down from operational squadrons when they get replacement planes. The stresses on a fire fighting c 130 are many times greater than on a military one due to the maneuvers required....imagine taking an old car and running it in the INDY 500! No matter how good your maintenance program is it won't hold up in that environment.....don't be so quick to pass judgement on military pilots when you have ZERO experience...except in your barco-lounger!
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- I can't help but remember a video of another C-130 that lost its wings because the crew didn't drop its liquid before trying to gain altitude. You just can't make a major change in attitude without first releasing all the weight you're carrying. These are cargo planes - not fighters.
- reply













