CBS/AP/ June 21, 2012, 10:13 PM

Sandusky's son says his father abused him; case goes to jury

Prosecutors said Sandusky was "a serial, predatory pedophile" who used gifts and the pageantry of Penn State's vaunted football program to lure and abuse vulnerable boys who came from troubled homes.

"What you should do is come out and say to the defendant that he molested and abused and give them back their souls," Senior Deputy Attorney General Joseph McGettigan III. "I give them to you. Acknowledge and give them justice."

Standing behind Sandusky, McGettigan implored the jury to convict him

"He molested and abused and hurt these children horribly," McGettigan said. "He knows he did it, and you know he did it.

"Find him guilty of everything."

Defense attorney Joseph Amendola argued that the 68-year-old Sandusky was targeted by investigators who coached accusers into making false claims about a generous man whose charity gave them much-needed love.

"They went after him, and I submit to you they were going to get him hell or high water, even if they had to coach witnesses," Amendola said in a sometimes angry closing argument.

Prosecutors said Sandusky met his victims through The Second Mile, a charity he founded for at-risk youth.

Eight young men testified that they were abused by Sandusky, and jurors also heard about two other alleged victims through other witnesses, including another former coach.

Sandusky has repeatedly denied the allegations, but he didn't testify during the trial.

But Amendola said the accusers' stories didn't make sense, since they also included frequent visits to Sandusky's home, trips to football games and other activities.

"Folks, you have to use your common sense," Amendola said. "Jerry Sandusky took these kids everywhere. Is that what a pedophile does? ... Does he parade these kids around?"

McGettigan countered with Sandusky's own words in a November interview with NBC's Bob Costas, in which he struggled to give direct answers to questions.

Asked if he was sexually attracted to boys, Sandusky said: "Sexually attracted, you know, I, I enjoy young people. I, I love to be around them. ... No, I'm not sexually attracted to young boys."

"I would think that the automatic response, if someone asks you if you're a criminal, a pedophile, a child molester, or anything along those lines, would be: `You're crazy. No. Are you nuts?"' McGettigan said.

Earlier Thursday, the judge in the case threw out three of the 51 child sex abuse charges against Sandusky.

If convicted, Sandusky could spend the rest of his life in state prison.

Additional reporting by CBS News' Paula Reid in Bellefonte, Pa.


2/2

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
106 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lloydbest1 says:
Matt, my man, you should have gone to the authorities LOOONNNNG before now. I believe you, mind, but waiting 'til the last minute doesn't do your case any good and will more likely than not, give even Jerry's C- defense team a shot in the arm they do not deserve.

Too late for a do-over but this should have come to light back in April....
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
James-staley says:
It is strange that he is not in Jail while he is going to court, it must be nice to have all of these people as a witness and he is still walking around and so free. also Gay men should not have children, it should only be for married men and females, that is one good reason why someone is gay, they do not want children and be married.
reply
brasileira2 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
WHAT The??!!!
What is "strange", as you say, is your comment - You are not very bright dear.
AVRWEBGUY replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
James-staley: Pedophilia is not a sexual preference and it's not about being gay. My kids have friends with gay parents. I never saw or heard anything untoward about them or their parents. Keep the gays out of this.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Teddie Seeley says:
I had been wondering if he molested any of the children, that he and his wife adopted. Or how about all the foster children, they took under their roof. Now we know he has, with at least one of them. Will the other children and grandchildren come forward? Matt, tried to commit suicide, I wonder if he got counseling, after this happened.
I'm really worried that Sandusky, will get away with these charges this time, because the son was not allowed to testify. His next jury will be able to hear Matt's testimony, then this creep of a man, will get what's coming to him.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
vista8635 says:
The Gimp ain't sleeping no more! Yay!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Bush-cheney-R-Terrorists says:
What a pha king weak phag.
reply
brasileira2 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
He is not a phag... phags like other men, not children
linkicon reporticon emailicon
chroniccomplainer says:
Somebody please shoot this jerk. His ego will soon shrink after he is in jail.
reply
brasileira2 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yeah, maybe his buddies in prison will have the same sexual appetite for him as he had for the children.
That will be sweet!!!!!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fitstshu says:
In the small town that I grew up in 50yrs. ago, we had a history teacher that preyed on young boys, and was held in high regard by the community.They even have a memorial at the waterfront park for him.When I saw it I dam near puked.How many kids in last 50yrs. have had their lives F'UP by these bstards while people looked the other way.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cybervigilante says:
The son came forward After the jurors were sequestered. That's kind of dumb. It will have no effect on the verdict.
reply
vista8635 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The gimp grew a pair!
ralphing replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
No he didn't!

He came forward early in the week to the prosecuters, who knew they couldn't put him on at this late point. They informed Sandusky on Thursday that if he testified in his own defense, they could put his son on as a rebuttal witness. That's why Sandusky decided against it, and that's when the defense rested their case.

It's been presented in the news, and definitely before the jury got the case. I do wish he had come forward earlier though.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ulgnud says:
Has any actual evidence been submitted to the court? Every time I see the press articles about this it seems another "Victim" appears. I don't know what to think.
reply
americalove1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ulgnud, there usually is no actual physical evidence. How could there be? Any physical injuries would have been long gone. There usually is only the victim's word. However, as I posted earlier, the testimony, as reported, clearly indicates classical pedaphile behavior.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
themanfrombrum says:
So how do you all feel now about gay men having male children?
reply
FranceH replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
What does that have to do with anything? A gay man caring for his son is no different than a mother caring for her son. A pedophile is a whole other entity.
Geoff_kl replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
another typical homophobic comment. It has been proven time and time again that the vast majority of pedophiles are straight men. Anyway, rape is rarely about sexual gratification. Its about power and control. Grow up if you want to take part in adult conversations....
See all 9 Replies
See all 106 Comments