Wildfire destroys most homes in Colo. history
The High Park Fire near Fort Collins, Colo., Saturday, June 16, 2012. / KCNC
Updated 9:59 PM ET
(AP) DENVER - Additional crews were arriving Saturday at a wildfire in northern Colorado that has scorched about 85 square miles and destroyed at least 181 homes, the most in state history.
The High Park Fire burning 15 miles west of Fort Collins surpasses the Fourmile Canyon wildfire, which destroyed 169 homes west of Boulder in September 2010.
Fire information officer Brett Haberstick said Saturday that more than 1,500 personnel are working on the Fort Collins-area fire. The lightning-caused blaze, which is believed to have killed a 62-year-old woman whose body was found in her cabin, was 20 percent contained. The fire's incident commander said full containment could be two to four weeks away.
Haberstick said hot and dry conditions were expected to continue, but crews have made progress in containing a 200-acre spot fire that erupted Thursday afternoon north of the Cache La Poudre River, a critical line of defense against northward growth.
"We're hopeful that we will be able to contain it today, but that will be determined by Mother Nature," Haberstick said.
Firefighters have extinguished other incursions north of the river, but the most recent one appeared to be more serious.
National Weather Service meteorologist Kyle Fredin said some rain was expected in the fire zone Saturday evening, but it will not be enough to put the fire out.
"We need a rain that will really last all day," he said. "But it's better than dry wind at this point."
The fire was reported June 9 and has since raced through large swaths of private and U.S. Forest Service land.
Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, who oversees the Forest Service, met with fire managers in Fort Collins on Saturday and said "fighting this fire is going to require us to be aggressive, persistent and also patient.
"We're going to continue to work to make our forests more resilient. We're going to continue to ensure that adequate resources are provided for fighting fires and we are going to continue to make sure that we encourage appropriate stewardship of our forests," he said.
Vilsack praised Congress for allowing the government to contract additional aircraft — particularly heavy tankers — to fight wildfires across the West. But he called on lawmakers for budget certainty to help plan for future fires.
Vilsack is scheduled to hold a news conference with U.S. Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell in Albuquerque on Sunday.
Meanwhile in New Mexico, questions were being raised about whether bureaucratic red tape prevented firefighters from saving more homes affected by the Little Bear Fire after federal officials released transcripts of the firefighters' response.
Congressman Steve Pearce said Friday in an interview with KOB-TV that he believed federal officials could have done more after lightning sparked the fire outside the resort town of Ruidoso on June 4. Days later, high winds sent embers more than a mile from the blaze's end, causing the inferno to grow.
But officials released transcripts of the response on the Lincoln National Forest website that suggested firefighters were attacking the blaze as soon as it was a quarter of an acre.
The fire has destroyed 224 homes and burned 59 square miles.
In Arizona, the Northern Arizona Incident Management Team took command of the 1,500 acre blaze in the Tonto National Forest. Officials said the fire was 15 percent contained and firefighters continued to battle unseasonably dry fuels, high temperatures and low humidity.
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Reporter Michael Hastings dies at 33
- Google asks FISA court to lift gag order on NSA requests
- Taliban: We killed 4 U.S. troops at Afghan air base
- Scientists say shipwreck timber in Lake Michigan centuries old
- TWA Flight 800 gets another look 17 years later
- Tornado briefly touches down on Denver airport runways
- Girl who lost feet in lawnmower gets prosthetics
- America's endangered historic places 11 Photos
I ask this because the causes of these wildfires are many, including but not limited to detrimental fire management practices. We have a drought in the west. Other than the Northwest's immediate Pacific coast there has been a deficit in rainfall that has gone on for so long I can't remember the last time there were two consecutive years of average or above rainfall anywhere in the Rocky Mountain states or the Desert Southwest. Snowpacks where they exist at all, are generally gone by April or May.
As a side note I traveled through Flagstaff the last weekend in April this year and saw a few patches of snow on Humphries Peak but dam'd little and as many times as I have been in this area have never seen so little snow so early in the year.
Because of factors I have mentioned in previous posts on related topics, I believe we are entering a new climatic "normal". Reduced rainfall and warmer temperatures will be the norm rather than the exception. Water is already in chronically short supply (when was the last time Lake Mead or Lake Powell were bank-full?) and with the region's population virtuallty guaranteed to increase - even if the economy continues to tank - such shortages will only get worse as the rainfall becomes less dependable.
There is a heavy political overlay in the thread and that's unfortuante. The situation is as it is now and whether it's the "Libtards" or the "Re-puke-licons" that are the blame for this becomes less relevant as the mess continues to spread. Those who are familiar with my partisan rantings also know I, personally, am about as far left as you can get with out shaking my own hand coming the other way. That said, it's long past time for all of us regardless of leanings to put our collective heads together and figure out how we are going to mitigate what I believe to be a future climate crisis with respect to our wooded lands - or even if we can. Othwerwise, those whose responsibility it is to manage an increasingly scarce water resource are going to have a lot of sleepless nights ahead and those who live in the belly of this new beast will have a dicey time of it hanging on to their homes and livelihoods.
Since when did Liberals, real ones, tell banks to gut their customers, offshore jobs to exploit slave labor and extort it, and everything else?
The term you really mean to use is "corporatist".
Unless you were being sarcastic...
Assuming you're not, which some people clearly are assuming, I'd heed euge005's response as well. It's nice that some civilized, thinking people post around here.